A randomised, open-label, cross-over clinical study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety and tolerability profiles of tobacco-free oral nicotine pouches relative to cigarettes

被引:10
|
作者
Chapman, Fiona [1 ]
McDermott, Simon [1 ]
Rudd, Kathryn [1 ]
Taverner, Victoria [1 ]
Stevenson, Matthew [1 ]
Chaudhary, Nveed [1 ]
Reichmann, Kerstin [1 ]
Thompson, Joseph [1 ]
Nahde, Thomas [2 ]
O'Connell, Grant [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Brands PLC, 121 Winterstoke Rd, Bristol BS3 2LL, Avon, England
[2] Imperial Brands PLC Co, Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken GmbH, Albert Einstein Ring 7, D-22761 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Tobacco harm reduction; Nicotine pouches; Nicotine; Oral nicotine delivery; Tobacco-free nicotine pouches; Cigarettes; Smoking; BIOMARKERS; EXPOSURE; PRODUCT; HARM;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-022-06178-6
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Rationale Tobacco harm reduction (THR) involves encouraging adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke to transition to less harmful forms of nicotine delivery. These products must offer adult smokers reduced exposure to chemicals associated with tobacco combustion, satisfactory blood plasma nicotine levels and serve as an acceptable alternative. The most recent THR innovation is tobacco-free oral nicotine pouches. Objectives This study aimed to compare pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety and tolerability profiles of two nicotine pouch variants (ZoneX #2 (5.8 mg nicotine/pouch); ZoneX #3 (10.1 mg nicotine/pouch)) with cigarette to assess the pouches' THR potential. Methods This was a controlled use, randomised, open-label, cross-over clinical study with 24 healthy adult traditional tobacco users. Pharmacokinetic (plasma nicotine levels; up to 8 h post-use), pharmacodynamic (urge to smoke, product liking; up to 4 h post-use) and short-term safety and tolerability profiles were assessed. Results Distinct nicotine pouch pharmacokinetic profiles indicated nicotine absorption via the oral mucosa. Plasma nicotine levels were lower, and time to peak slower, for the nicotine pouches compared to cigarette (C-max cigarette: 11.6 ng/ml vs. #2: 5.2 ng/ml, p < 0.0001; #3: 7.9 ng/ml, p < 0.0003) (T-max cigarette: 8.6 min vs. #2: 26 min; #3: 22 min). All products effectively reduced subjects' urge to smoke and presented favourable product liking scores; nicotine pouches were also well tolerated following short-term use (no serious adverse events). Conclusions Overall, the assessed ZoneX nicotine pouches may offer an acceptable alternative for adult smokers to achieve satisfactory levels of nicotine delivery and, based on the pharmacokinetic parameters and under the study conditions, likely have a lower abuse liability and addictive potential for current adult smokers compared to continued cigarette smoking. Clinical trial identifier: NCT04891406 (clinicaltrials.gov).
引用
收藏
页码:2931 / 2943
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] A randomised, open-label, cross-over clinical study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety and tolerability profiles of tobacco-free oral nicotine pouches relative to cigarettes
    Fiona Chapman
    Simon McDermott
    Kathryn Rudd
    Victoria Taverner
    Matthew Stevenson
    Nveed Chaudhary
    Kerstin Reichmann
    Joseph Thompson
    Thomas Nahde
    Grant O’Connell
    Psychopharmacology, 2022, 239 : 2931 - 2943
  • [2] A randomised, open-label, cross-over clinical study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of cigarettes and e-cigarettes with nicotine salt formulations in US adult smokers
    Grant O’Connell
    John D. Pritchard
    Chris Prue
    Joseph Thompson
    Thomas Verron
    Donald Graff
    Tanvir Walele
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2019, 14 : 853 - 861
  • [3] A randomised, open-label, cross-over clinical study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of cigarettes and e-cigarettes with nicotine salt formulations in US adult smokers
    O'Connell, Grant
    Pritchard, John D.
    Prue, Chris
    Thompson, Joseph
    Verron, Thomas
    Graff, Donald
    Walele, Tanvir
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 14 (06) : 853 - 861
  • [4] Characterization of the nicotine uptake and safety of Nordic spirit tobacco-free oral nicotine pouches: A randomized cross-over study
    Karine Renard
    Daisuke Nishihara
    Johan Nilsson
    Sylvain Larroque
    Javier Martinez
    Lesley Giles
    Psychopharmacology, 2025, 242 (4) : 855 - 865
  • [5] A Randomised, Two-Period, Cross-Over, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Single Doses of Two Different Flurbiprofen 8.75-mg Lozenges in Healthy Volunteers
    Matzneller, Peter
    Burian, Angela
    Martin, Wolfgang
    Annoni, Ottavia
    Lauro, Vittoria
    Tacchi, Raffaella
    Brunner, Martin
    Zeitlinger, Markus
    PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 89 (3-4) : 188 - 191
  • [6] Pharmacokinetics and safety evaluation of oral Palonosetron in Chinese healthy volunteers: A phase 1, open-label, randomized, cross-over study
    Chen, Rui
    Wang, Hongyun
    Zhong, Wen
    Chessari, Salvatore
    Lanzarotti, Corinna
    Bernareggi, Alberto
    Hu, Pei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 160
  • [7] Multicenter, Open-Label Phase I Clinical Study of Oral Rigosertib in Japanese Patients with Recurrent/Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Tolerability, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetic Profiles
    Ishizawa, Kenichi
    Usuki, Kensuke
    Ando, Kiyoshi
    Ueda, Yasunori
    Kiguchi, Toru
    Uike, Naokuni
    Onishi, Yasushi
    Iida, Hiroatsu
    BLOOD, 2016, 128 (22)
  • [8] A Phase 2 Open-Label, Multicenter, Dose Optimization Clinical Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Profiles of Cfi-400945 As a Single Agent or in Combination with Azacitidine or Decitabine in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
    Jonas, Brian A.
    Bixby, Dale L.
    Brandwein, Joseph M.
    Yee, Karen W. L.
    Murphy, Tracy
    Minden, Mark D.
    Michelson, Glenn C.
    Bray, Mark R.
    Roberts-Thomson, Emily Elizabeth
    Borthakur, Gautam
    BLOOD, 2020, 136
  • [9] Vitamin D3 supplementation in healthy adults: a comparison between capsule and oral spray solution as a method of delivery in a wintertime, randomised, open-label, cross-over study
    Todd, Joshua J.
    McSorley, Emeir M.
    Pourshahidi, L. Kirsty
    Madigan, Sharon M.
    Laird, Eamon
    Healy, Martin
    Magee, Pamela J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2016, 116 (08) : 1402 - 1408
  • [10] A phase I, randomized, open-label, cross-over study of the pharmacokinetics, dermal tolerability, and safety of MRX-7EAT Etodolac-Lidocaine Topical Patch in healthy volunteers
    Miwa, Y.
    Hamamoto, H.
    Hikake, S.
    Kuwabara, Y.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 14 (04): : S72 - S72