Integrated Sizing and Optimization of Aircraft and Subsystem Architectures in Early Design

被引:7
|
作者
Rajaram, Dushhyanth [1 ]
Cai, Yu [1 ]
Chakraborty, Imon [1 ]
Mavris, Dimitri N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Aerosp Syst Design Lab, Daniel Guggenheim Sch Aerosp Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2018年 / 55卷 / 05期
关键词
MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN;
D O I
10.2514/1.C034661
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The aerospace industry's current trend towards novel or More Electric architectures results in some unique challenges for designers due to both the scarcity or absence of historical data and a potentially large combinatorial space of possible architectures. These add to the already existing challenges of attempting to optimize an aircraft design in the presence of multiple possible objective functions while avoiding an overly compartmentalized approach. This paper uses the Integrated Subsystem Sizing and Architecture Assessment Capability to pursue a multi-objective optimization for a large twin-aisle aircraft and a small single-aisle aircraft using the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) algorithm with parallel function evaluations. One novelty of the optimization setup is that it explicitly considers the impacts of subsystem architectures in addition to those of traditional aircraft-level design variables. The optimization yields generations of nondominated designs in which substantially electrified subsystem architectures are found to predominate. As a first assessment of the impact of epistemic uncertainty on the results obtained, the optimization is rerun with altered sensitivities for the thrust-specific fuel consumption penalties due to shaft-power and bleed air extraction. This analysis demonstrated that the composition of architectures on the Pareto frontier is sensitive to the secondary power extraction penalties, but more so for the small single-aisle aircraft than the large twin-aisle aircraft.
引用
收藏
页码:1942 / 1954
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated Assessment of Aircraft and Novel Subsystem Architectures in Early Design
    Chakraborty, Imon
    Mavris, Dimitri N.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2017, 54 (04): : 1268 - 1282
  • [2] An integrated approach to vehicle and subsystem sizing and analysis for novel subsystem architectures
    Chakraborty, Imon
    Mavris, Dimitri N.
    Emeneth, Mathias
    Schneegans, Alexander
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2016, 230 (03) : 496 - 514
  • [3] Morphing Aircraft Sizing Using Design Optimization
    Crossley, William A.
    Skillen, Michael D.
    Frommer, Joshua B.
    Roth, Brian D.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2011, 48 (02): : 612 - 622
  • [4] Optimal Paths for Progressive Aircraft Subsystem Electrification in Early Design
    Bendarkar, Mayank V.
    Rajaram, Dushhyanth
    Cai, Yu
    Mavris, Dimitri N.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2022, 59 (01): : 219 - 232
  • [5] Structural Sizing, Aeroelastic Analysis, and Optimization in Aircraft Conceptual Design
    Cavagna, L.
    Ricci, S.
    Riccobene, L.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2011, 48 (06): : 1840 - 1855
  • [6] Optimization of an aircraft power distribution subsystem
    Chandrasekaran, S., 1600, American Inst. Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (40):
  • [7] Optimization of an aircraft power distribution subsystem
    Chandrasekaran, S
    Ragon, SA
    Lindner, DK
    Gürdal, Z
    Boroyevich, D
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2003, 40 (01): : 16 - 26
  • [8] Assessing Impact of Epistemic and Technological Uncertainty on Aircraft Subsystem Architectures
    Chakraborty, Imon
    Mavris, Dimitri N.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2017, 54 (04): : 1388 - 1406
  • [9] Simultaneous aircraft sizing and multi-objective optimization considering off-design mission performance during early design
    Cai, Yu
    Rajaram, Dushhyanth
    Mavris, Dimitri N.
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 126
  • [10] An optimization approach to integrated aircraft-controller design
    Yang, GH
    Lum, KY
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2003, : 1649 - 1654