Smart home technologies in Europe: A critical review of concepts, benefits, risks and policies

被引:197
|
作者
Sovacool, Benjamin K. [1 ,2 ]
Del Rio, Dylan D. Furszyfer [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sch Business, SPRU, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Dev & Technol, Ctr Energy Technol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Environm Policy, London, England
来源
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Smart homes; Smart home technologies; Smart meters; Energy and buildings; Energy feedback; Smart grids; Digital society; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ADOPTION; USERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2019.109663
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Smart home technologies refer to devices that provide some degree of digitally connected, automated, or enhanced services to building occupants. Smart homes have become central in recent technology and policy discussions about energy efficiency, climate change, and the sustainability of buildings. Nevertheless, do they truly promote sustainability goals? In addition, what sorts of benefits, risks, and policies do they entail? Based on an extensive original dataset involving expert interviews, site visits to retailers, and a comprehensive review of the literature, this study critically examines the promise and peril of smart home technologies. Drawing on original data collected in the United Kingdom, which has access to European markets, the study first examines definitions of smart homes before offering a new classification involving 13 categories of smart technology covering 267 specific options commercially available from 113 companies. It situates these different technology classes alongside six degrees or levels of smartness, from the basic or traditional home to the fully automated and sentient home. It then elaborates on the 13 distinct benefits smart homes may offer alongside potential 17 risks and barriers, before introducing seven policy recommendations from the material. It lastly suggests three areas of future research on the demographics and behavior of actual smart home adopters, rethinking the duality of "control," and looking beyond "homes" towards socio-technical systems, practices, and justice.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Smart home technologies in Europe: a critical review of concepts, benefits, risks and policies (vol 120, 109663, 2020)
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    Del Rio, Dylan D. Furszyfer
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 148
  • [2] Benefits and risks of smart home technologies
    Wilson, Charlie
    Hargreaves, Tom
    Hauxwell-Baldwin, Richard
    ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 103 : 72 - 83
  • [3] Smart Home Technologies: A Preliminary Review
    Balakrishnan, Sumathi
    Vasudavan, Hemalata
    Murugesan, Raja Kumar
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: IOT AND SMART CITY (ICIT 2018), 2018, : 120 - 127
  • [4] Theoretical Concepts of Smart Cities: A Critical Review
    Keshvardoost, Sina
    Renukappa, Suresh
    Suresh, Subashini
    Alamil, Hani
    2019 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART GRID AND SMART CITIES (ICSGSC 2019), 2019, : 26 - 31
  • [5] Benefits and barriers associated with the use of smart home health technologies in the care of older persons: a systematic review
    Yi Jiao (Angelina) Tian
    Nadine Andrea Felber
    Félix Pageau
    Delphine Roulet Schwab
    Tenzin Wangmo
    BMC Geriatrics, 24
  • [6] Benefits and barriers associated with the use of smart home health technologies in the care of older persons: a systematic review
    Tian, Yi Jiao
    Felber, Nadine Andrea
    Pageau, Felix
    Schwab, Delphine Roulet
    Wangmo, Tenzin
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [7] Home Energy Management System Concepts, Configurations, and Technologies for the Smart Grid
    Zafar, Usman
    Bayhan, Sertac
    Sanfilippo, Antonio
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 119271 - 119286
  • [8] Healing and edible clays: a review of basic concepts, benefits and risks
    Celso de Sousa Figueiredo Gomes
    Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2018, 40 : 1739 - 1765
  • [9] Healing and edible clays: a review of basic concepts, benefits and risks
    Figueiredo Gomes, Celso de Sousa
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH, 2018, 40 (05) : 1739 - 1765