Competition, securitization, and efficiency in US banks*

被引:8
|
作者
Bayeh, Antonio [1 ]
Bitar, Mohammad [2 ]
Burlacu, Radu [3 ]
Walker, Thomas [4 ]
机构
[1] Lyon Catholic Univ, ESDES Business Sch, 10 Pl Arch, F-69288 Lyon 02, France
[2] Univ Nottingham, Business Sch, Wollaton Rd, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
[3] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CERAG, 150 Rue Chim, F-38040 Grenoble 09, France
[4] Concordia Univ, John Molson Sch Business, Dept Finance, 1455 Blvd Maisonneuve West, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Securitization; Competition; Bank efficiency; Screening and monitoring; Bank regulation; MARKET POWER; PANEL-DATA; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; PROPENSITY SCORE; X-INEFFICIENCY; COST; MANAGEMENT; DEREGULATION; SENSITIVITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.qref.2021.04.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the different effects of competition and securitization on US bank efficiency between 2001 and 2019. Using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and a two-step dynamic Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimation, we find that higher securitization increases banks' cost efficiency scores. When banks are under competitive pressure, the fixed-effects and GMM models show that securitization is positively associated with the cost efficiency of banks, while it mitigates their screening and monitoring incentives. Robust to a battery of alternative tests, our findings introduce bank efficiency as a new mechanism explaining how banks that securitize loans insignificantly invest in screening and monitoring their potentially risky borrowers. In order to promote sustainable loan quality, this paper underlines the importance of improved regulation in highly competitive markets where loan securitization is more common. (c) 2021 Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 576
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Securitization and risk: empirical evidence on US banks
    Uzun, Hatice
    Webb, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK FINANCE, 2007, 8 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [2] What explains the recourse of US commercial banks to securitization?
    Bensalah, Nesrine
    Fedhila, Hassouna
    [J]. REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2016, 15 (03) : 317 - 328
  • [3] Securitization and risk appetite: empirical evidence from US banks
    Filomeni, Stefano
    [J]. REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2024, 63 (02) : 433 - 468
  • [4] Efficiency, diversification, and performance of US banks
    Abu Khan
    Hassan, M. Kabir
    Maroney, Neal
    Boujlil, Rhada
    Ozkan, Bora
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 67 : 101 - 117
  • [5] Schumpeterian competition and efficiency among commercial banks
    Duygun, Meryem
    Sena, Vania
    Shahan, Mohamed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (12) : 5176 - 5185
  • [6] Securitization and Banks' Equity Risk
    Wu, Deming
    Yang, Jiawen
    Hong, Han
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 39 (03) : 95 - 117
  • [7] Securitization and Banks’ Equity Risk
    Deming Wu
    Jiawen Yang
    Han Hong
    [J]. Journal of Financial Services Research, 2011, 39 : 95 - 117
  • [8] Securitization and Banks' Capital Structure
    Almazan, Andres
    Martin-Oliver, Alfredo
    Saurina, Jesus
    [J]. REVIEW OF CORPORATE FINANCE STUDIES, 2015, 4 (02): : 206 - 238
  • [9] Securitization and Lending Competition
    Frankel, David M.
    Jin, Yu
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2015, 82 (04): : 1383 - 1408
  • [10] Securitization, competition and monitoring
    Ahn, Jung-Hyun
    Breton, Regis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2014, 40 : 195 - 210