All-cause mortality among breast cancer patients in a screening trial: support for breast cancer mortality as an end point

被引:55
|
作者
Tabar, L
Duffy, SW
Yen, MF
Warwick, J
Vitak, B
Chen, HH
Smith, RA [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Canc Soc, Dept Canc Control, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[2] Falun Cent Hosp, Dept Mammog, Falun, Sweden
[3] Canc Res UK, Dept Math Stat & Epidemiol, London, England
[4] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jms.9.4.159
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: It has recently been suggested that all-cause mortality is a more appropriate end point than disease specific mortality in cancer screening trials, and that disease specific mortality is biased in favour of screening. This suggestion is based partly on supposed inconsistencies between all-cause mortality results and disease specific results in cancer screening trials, and alleged increases in deaths from causes other than breast cancer among breast cancer cases diagnosed among women invited to screening. Methods: We used data from the Swedish Two-County Trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer, in which 77 080 women were randomised to an invitation to screening and 55 985 to no invitation. We estimated relative risks (RRs) (invited v control) of death from breast cancer, death from other causes within the breast cancer cases, and death from all causes within the breast cancer cases. RRs were adjusted for age and took account of the longer follow up of breast cancer cases in the invited group due to lead time. Results: There was a significant 31% reduction in breast cancer mortality in the invited group (RR 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.80; p<0.001). There was no significant increase in deaths from other causes among breast cancer cases in the invited group (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.96-1.31; p=0.14). A significant 19% reduction in deaths from all causes was observed among breast cancer cases in the group invited to screening (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.90; p<0.001). A more conservative estimation gave a significant 13% reduction (RR 0.87, 95% Cl 0.78-0.97; p=0.01). These findings are consistent with the magnitude of the reduction in breast cancer mortality. Conclusions: Invitation to screening was associated with a reduction in deaths from all causes among breast cancer cases, consistent with high participation rates in screening. There is no significant evidence of bias in cause of death classification in the Two-County Trial, and as breast cancer mortality is the targeted clinical outcome in breast cancer screening, it is the appropriate end point in a breast cancer screening trial. All-cause mortality is a poor and inefficient surrogate for breast cancer mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 162
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Value of All-Cause Mortality as a Metric for Assessing Breast Cancer Screening
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    Mainprize, James G.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2020, 112 (10) : 989 - 993
  • [2] Other- and all-cause Mortality among women with breast cancer
    Pierre-Victor, Dudith
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    McCaskill-Stevens, Worta
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 65
  • [3] Association of Allostatic Load With All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Breast Cancer
    Obeng-Gyasi, Samilia
    Elsaid, Mohamed I.
    Lu, Yurong
    Chen, J. C.
    Carson, William E.
    Ballinger, Tarah J.
    Andersen, Barbara L.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (05) : E2313989
  • [4] All-Cause Mortality in Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Mayer, Dan
    [J]. CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2018, 17 (01) : E127 - E127
  • [5] Family history of breast cancer and all-cause mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
    Ellen T. Chang
    Roger L. Milne
    Kelly-Anne Phillips
    Jane C. Figueiredo
    Meera Sangaramoorthy
    Theresa H. M. Keegan
    Irene L. Andrulis
    John L. Hopper
    Pamela J. Goodwin
    Frances P. O’Malley
    Nayana Weerasooriya
    Carmel Apicella
    Melissa C. Southey
    Michael L. Friedlander
    Graham G. Giles
    Alice S. Whittemore
    Dee W. West
    Esther M. John
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2009, 117 : 167 - 176
  • [6] Family history of breast cancer and all-cause mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
    Chang, Ellen T.
    Milne, Roger L.
    Phillips, Kelly-Anne
    Figueiredo, Jane C.
    Sangaramoorthy, Meera
    Keegan, Theresa H. M.
    Andrulis, Irene L.
    Hopper, John L.
    Goodwin, Pamela J.
    O'Malley, Frances P.
    Weerasooriya, Nayana
    Apicella, Carmel
    Southey, Melissa C.
    Friedlander, Michael L.
    Giles, Graham G.
    Whittemore, Alice S.
    West, Dee W.
    John, Esther M.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 117 (01) : 167 - 176
  • [7] Type 2 Diabetes and all-cause mortality among Spanish women with breast cancer
    Fernandez-Arce, L.
    Robles-Rodriguez, N.
    Fernandez-Feito, A.
    Llaneza-Folgueras, A.
    Encinas-Muniz, A., I
    Lana, A.
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2022, 33 (02) : 271 - 278
  • [8] Type 2 Diabetes and all-cause mortality among Spanish women with breast cancer
    L. Fernández-Arce
    N. Robles-Rodríguez
    A. Fernández-Feito
    A. Llaneza-Folgueras
    A. I. Encinas-Muñiz
    A. Lana
    [J]. Cancer Causes & Control, 2022, 33 : 271 - 278
  • [9] Role of social isolation and support on all-cause and breast cancer specific mortality among women with breast cancer: The Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) Study
    Gandhi, Shipra
    Nie, Jing
    Patel, Archit
    Trevisan, Maurizio
    Attwood, Kristopher
    Freudenheeim, Jo L.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (09)
  • [10] Impact of Preexisting Mental Illness on All-Cause and Breast Cancer-Specific Mortality in Elderly Patients With Breast Cancer
    Iglay, Kristy
    Santorelli, Melissa L.
    Hirshfield, Kim M.
    Williams, Jill M.
    Rhoads, George G.
    Lin, Yong
    Demissie, Kitaw
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (36) : 4012 - +