共 50 条
Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion battery recycling using pyrometallurgical technologies
被引:84
|作者:
Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali
[1
,7
]
Raugei, Marco
[2
,7
]
Steubing, Bernhard
[3
]
Hartwell, Anthony
[4
,7
]
Anderson, Paul A.
[5
,7
]
Heidrich, Oliver
[1
,6
,7
]
机构:
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Engn, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Oxford Brookes Univ, Sch Engn Comp & Math, Wheatley, Oxon, England
[3] Leiden Univ, Inst Environm Sci CML, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Univ Birmingham, Sch Met & Mat, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ Birmingham, Sch Chem, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[6] Newcastle Univ, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[7] Faraday Inst ReLiB Project, Quad One,Harwell Sci & Innovat Campus, Didcot, Oxon, England
基金:
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词:
electric vehicles;
emerging technologies;
industrial ecology;
lithium-ion batteries;
plasma;
recycling;
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT;
BIODIESEL BLENDS;
RECOVERY;
ENERGY;
EMISSIONS;
IMPACT;
D O I:
10.1111/jiec.13157
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
Among existing and emerging technologies to recycle spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) from electric vehicles, pyrometallurgical processes are commercially used. However, very little is known about their environmental and energy impacts. In this study, three pyrometallurgical technologies are analyzed and compared in terms of global warming potential (GWP) and cumulative energy demand (CED), namely: an emerging direct current (DC) plasma smelting technology (Sc-1), the same DC plasma technology but with an additional pre-treatment stage (Sc-2), and a more commercially mature ultrahigh temperature (UHT) furnace (Sc-3). The net impacts for the recovered metals are calculated using both "open-loop" and "closed-loop" recycling options. Results reveal that shifting from the UHT furnace technology (Sc-3) to the DC plasma technology could reduce the GWP of the recycling process by up to a factor of 5 (when employing pre-treatment, as is the case with Sc-2). Results also vary across factors, for example, different metal recovery rates, carbon/energy intensity of the electricity grid (in Sc-1 and Sc-2), rates of aluminum recovery (in Sc-2), and sources of coke (in Sc-3). However, the sensitivity analysis showed that these factors do not change the best option which was determined before (as Sc-2) except in a few cases for CED. Overall, the research methodology and application presented by this life cycle assessment informs future energy and environmental impact assessment studies that want to assess existing recycling processes of LIB or other emerging technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1560 / 1571
页数:12
相关论文