The optimal dual-pricing policy of mall parking service

被引:16
|
作者
Chang, Ching-Ter [2 ]
Chung, Cheng-Kung [2 ]
Sheu, Jiuh-Biing [3 ]
Zhuang, Zheng-Yun [1 ,4 ]
Chen, Huang-Mu [5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ City Coll, Sch Comp & Comp Sci, 51 Huzhou St, Hangzhou 310015, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Grad Inst Business Management, Coll Management, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Management, Dept Business Adm, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[4] Natl Def Univ, Coll Management, Dept Informat Management, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[5] Ming Chi Univ Technol, Dept Business & Management, New Taipei City 24301, Taiwan
关键词
Pricing; Decision; Parking lot; Mall; Analytical approach; Goal programming; DECISION-MAKERS PREFERENCES; DOWNTOWN PARKING; MODELING DEMAND; GOAL; OPTIMIZATION; PROVISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In studies of parking policy, the role of parking pricing has been addressed. Most researches have focused on the determination of a proper price for city parking spaces that are open to the public and it is now evident that price is used by authorities as a tool to manage transport demand. However, studies of parking pricing that pertain to privately-owned parking resources are few and in particular, the problem of setting a proper price for physical market parking has rarely been studied, such as a mall's 'dual-pricing portfolio' decision for the simultaneous determination of a parking fee and the consumer spending required for free parking (i.e., the 'threshold'). This is a common problem for most malls, but the different agents involved (e.g., the visitors, the mall, the marketplace and the parking lot departments) usually have diverse goals, so the decision must take account of a multiplicity of criteria and subtle relationships. In order to systematically support this type of interdepartmental decision process, a decision model that includes an analytical decision-aid process and the relevant programming models is established. A numerical example verifies the proposed model by taking the data for a mall in Taiwan and the implications, in terms of management, are given. This systematic computational model can be generalized to any type of commercial market that requires a (new) parking pricing policy. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 243
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dissecting the visiting willingness of driving visitors facing a retail market's dual-pricing policy for parking
    Zhuang, Zheng-Yun
    Chung, Cheng-Kung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2024, 78
  • [2] Dual-pricing Policy for Controller-side Strategies in Demand Side Management
    Yue, Siyu
    Chen, Jiong
    Gu, Yuantao
    Wu, Chenye
    Shi, Yiyu
    [J]. 2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART GRID COMMUNICATIONS (SMARTGRIDCOMM), 2011,
  • [4] Charging parking by the minute: What to expect from this parking pricing policy?
    Caicedo, Felix
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2012, 19 (01) : 63 - 68
  • [5] Optimal dynamic pricing for morning commute parking
    Qian, Zhen
    Rajagopal, Ram
    [J]. TRANSPORTMETRICA A-TRANSPORT SCIENCE, 2015, 11 (04) : 291 - 316
  • [6] FORMULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A PRICING POLICY FOR MUNICIPAL PARKING
    LAMBE, TA
    WILD, CD
    [J]. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 1980, 14 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [7] OPTIMAL PRICING POLICY FOR THE SERVICE FACILITY OFFERING A SET OF PRIORITY PRICES
    ALPERSTEIN, H
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1988, 34 (05) : 666 - 671
  • [8] Optimal stochastic control for parking systems: occupancy-driven parking pricing
    Qian, Sean
    Rajagopal, Ram
    [J]. 2013 IEEE 52ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2013, : 7771 - 7776
  • [9] A game-theory based parking pricing policy
    Wang, Shijjin
    Hu, Ting
    [J]. 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEE IEEM), 2020, : 230 - 234
  • [10] Modelling demand under parking and cordon pricing policy
    Azari, Kian Ahmadi
    Arintono, Sulistyo
    Hamid, Hussain
    Rahmat, Riza Atiq O. K.
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2013, 25 : 1 - 9