Spinopelvic mobility affects accuracy of acetabular anteversion measurements on cross-table lateral radiographs

被引:6
|
作者
Bracey, D. N. [1 ]
Hegde, V [1 ]
Shimmin, A. J. [1 ]
Jennings, J. M. [1 ]
Pierrepont, J. W. [1 ]
Dennis, D. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Joint Replacement, Denver, CO 80210 USA
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2021年 / 103B卷 / 07期
关键词
TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; COMPONENT ANTEVERSION; RISK-FACTORS; PELVIC TILT; CUP; ORIENTATION; CT; VERSION; SPINE; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-2284.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Cross-table lateral (CTL) radiographs are commonly used to measure acetabular component anteversion after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The CTL measurements may differ by > 10 degrees from CT scan measurements but the reasons for this discrepancy are poorly understood. Anteversion measurements from CTL radiographs and CT scans are compared to identify spinopelvic parameters predictive of inaccuracy. Methods THA patients (n = 47; 27 males, 20 females; mean age 62.9 years (SD 6.95)) with preoperative spinopelvic mobility, radiological analysis, and postoperative CT scans were retrospectively reviewed. Acetabular component anteversion was measured on postoperative CTL radiographs and CT scans using 3D reconstructions of the pelvis. Two cohorts were identified based on a CTL-CT error of > 10 degrees (n = 11) or < 10 degrees (n = 36). Spinopelvic mobility parameters were compared using independent-samples t-tests. Correlation between error and mobility parameters were assessed with Pearson's coefficient. Results Patients with CTL error > 10 degrees (10 degrees to 14 degrees) had stiffer lumbar spines with less mean lumbar flexion (38.9 degrees(SD 11.6 degrees) vs 47.4 degrees (SD 13.1 degrees); p = 0.030), different sagittal balance measured by pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (5.9 degrees (SD 18.8 degrees) vs -1.7 degrees (SD 9.8 degrees); p = 0.042), more pelvic extension when seated (pelvic tilt -9.7 degrees (SD 14.1 degrees) vs -2.2 degrees (SD 13.2 degrees); p = 0.050), and greater change in pelvic tilt between supine and seated positions (12.6 degrees (SD 12.1 degrees) vs 4.7 degrees (SD 12.5 degrees); p = 0.036). The CTL measurement error showed a positive correlation with increased CTL anteversion (r= 0.5; p = 0.001), standing lordosis (r= 0.23; p = 0.050), seated lordosis (r= 0.4; p = 0.009), and pelvic tilt change between supine and step-up positions (r= 0.34; p = 0.010). Conclusion Differences in spinopelvic mobility may explain the variability of acetabular anteversion measurements made on CTL radiographs. Patients with stiff spines and increased compensatory pelvic movement have less accurate measurements on CTL radiographs. Flexion of the contralateral hip is required to obtain clear CTL radiographs. In patients with lumbar stiffness, this movement may extend the pelvis and increase anteversion of the acetabulum on CTL views. Reliable analysis of acetabular component anteversion in this patient population may require advanced imaging with a CT scan.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 65
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] The Reliability and Variation of Acetabular Component Anteversion Measurements From Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs
    Nunley, Ryan M.
    Keeney, James A.
    Zhu, Jinjun
    Clohisy, John C.
    Barrack, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (06): : 84 - 87
  • [2] Assessment of Acetabular Component Anteversion after Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparison of Anteroposterior and Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs with Computed Tomography Scans
    Goyal, Tarun
    Paul, Souvik
    Choudhury, Arghya Kundu
    Gupta, Tushar
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (03) : 329 - 335
  • [3] A Novel Method for Evaluating Combined Component Anteversion in Total Hip Arthroplasty on Cross-Table Lateral Hip Radiographs
    Dimitriou, Dimitris
    Zindel, Christoph
    Winkler, Elin
    Cornaz, Frederic
    Mazel, Peter
    Zingg, Patrick
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2023, 153 : 43S - 44S
  • [4] A novel method for evaluating combined component anteversion in total hip arthroplasty on cross-table lateral hip radiographs
    Dimitriou, Dimitris
    Zindel, Christoph
    Winkler, Elin
    Cornaz, Frederic
    Mazel, Peter
    Zingg, Patrick O. O.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (09) : 5977 - 5984
  • [5] A novel method for evaluating combined component anteversion in total hip arthroplasty on cross-table lateral hip radiographs
    Dimitris Dimitriou
    Christoph Zindel
    Elin Winkler
    Frédéric Cornaz
    Peter Mazel
    Patrick O. Zingg
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 5977 - 5984
  • [6] Usefulness of Prone Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs in Vertebral Compression Fractures
    Cho, Jae Hwan
    Shin, Sang Ik
    Lee, Jae Hyup
    Yeom, Jin Sup
    Chang, Bong-Soon
    Lee, Choon-Ki
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2013, 5 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [7] Accuracy of Cross-Table Lateral Knee Radiography for Evaluation of Joint Effusions
    Tai, Angela W.
    Alparslan, Hatice L.
    Townsend, Brent A.
    Oei, Tamara N.
    Govindarajulu, Usha S.
    Aliabadi, Piran
    Weissman, Barbara N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (04) : W339 - W344
  • [8] The effect of arm traction on the adequacy of cross-table lateral cervical spine radiographs
    Bowe, CT
    Burton, JH
    Chandler, RC
    Davidson, RM
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 55 (04): : 800 - 801
  • [9] Accuracy and Reliability of Standing Lateral Lumbar Radiographs for Measurements of Spinopelvic Parameters
    Wu, Jingye
    Wei, Feng
    Ma, Lin
    Li, Jianing
    Zhang, Ning
    Tian, Wei
    Sun, Yuqing
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (15) : 1033 - 1038
  • [10] New cross-table lateral radiography method for measuring acetabular component anteversion in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study of 93 primary THA
    Seo, Hajime
    Naito, Masatoshi
    Nakamura, Yoshinari
    Kinoshita, Koichi
    Nomura, Tomohiro
    Minokawa, So
    Minamikawa, Tomohiko
    Yamamoto, Takuaki
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 27 (03) : 293 - 298