Life cycle assessment of low-rise office building with different structure-envelope configurations

被引:12
|
作者
Alshamrani, Othman Subhi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dammam, Coll Architecture & Planning, Dept Bldg Engn, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
关键词
energy simulation; LCA; structure and envelope; environmental impact; energy consumption; global warming; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK; ENERGY USE; LCA; CONSTRUCTION; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1139/cjce-2015-0431
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents life cycle assessment approach to study the impact of structure and envelope types on the energy consumption and environmental impact of an office building in New York City, USA. In addition, the future costs of environmental impact for various structure and envelope options are assessed according to the current practice and market price of CO2. Eight structure and envelope types for the low-rise office building are investigated, which include concrete and steel structures with various combinations of envelopes. The parameters such as life cycle energy use, global warming potential, and water, air and land emissions are analyzed. The energy simulation is performed by using eQUEST software while the environmental impact is assessed by using ATHENA (R) impact estimator. The building with concrete frame is proved to have lower environmental impact compared to that with steel frame. The precast concrete building is found to be the most economical alternative due to the minimal environmental impact cost. This study is expected to enable the decision makers and building owners to select the best alternative with respect to energy use, and environmental and economic constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 200
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Wind Loads on Low-Rise Building Models with Different Roof Configurations
    Prasad, Deepak
    Uliate, Tuputa
    Ahmed, M. Rafiuddin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (03) : 231 - 243
  • [2] Environmental impact assessment of building envelope components for low-rise buildings
    Zigart, Maja
    Lukman, Rebeka Kovacic
    Premrov, Miroslav
    Leskovar, Vesna Zegarac
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 163 : 501 - 512
  • [3] Seismic assessment of low-rise building with transfer structure
    Li, JH
    Sul, RKL
    Chandler, AM
    Lam, NTK
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BUILDING TECHNOLOGY, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 747 - 754
  • [4] Life cycle ecological footprint of building: a case study of low-rise tropical residential building
    Y. Ansari
    D. Husain
    S. M. Haadi
    J. Haloi
    R. Prakash
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20 : 9779 - 9794
  • [5] BUILDING-TYPES STUDY, LOW-RISE OFFICE BUILDINGS
    SMITH, HL
    [J]. ARCHITECTURAL RECORD, 1985, 173 (01) : 97 - 113
  • [6] Life cycle ecological footprint of building: a case study of low-rise tropical residential building
    Ansari, Y.
    Husain, D.
    Haadi, S. M.
    Haloi, J.
    Prakash, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 20 (09) : 9779 - 9794
  • [7] Life Cycle Assessment for Building Envelope
    Bao, Dongjie
    Zhang, Wenxia
    Yang, Jiangbo
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 724-725 : 1643 - 1649
  • [8] Wind-Induced Hazard Assessment for Low-Rise Building Envelope Considering Potential Openings
    Ji, Xiaowen
    Huang, Guoqing
    Wu, Fengbo
    Lu, Zhao-Hui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (04)
  • [9] Life Cycle Assessment of Retrofitting Large Prefabricated Panels Low-Rise Collective Dwellings
    Ungureanu, Viorel
    Muntean, Daniel M.
    [J]. 3RD WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE, URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM (WMCAUS 2018), 2019, 471
  • [10] Internal pressure in a low-rise building with existing envelope openings and sudden breaching
    Tecle, Amanuel S.
    Bitsuamlak, Girma T.
    Aly, Aly Mousaad
    [J]. WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2013, 16 (01) : 25 - 46