The Impact of COVID-19 Management Policies Tailored to Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Transmission: Policy Analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Telles, Charles Roberto [1 ]
Roy, Archisman [2 ]
Ajmal, Mohammad Rehan [3 ]
Mustafa, Syed Khalid [4 ]
Ahmad, Mohammad Ayaz [5 ]
de la Serna, Juan Moises [6 ]
Frigo, Elisandro Pires [7 ]
Rosales, Manuel Hernandez [8 ]
机构
[1] Secretary State Educ & Sport Parana, Internal Control Ctr, Av Agua Verde 2140, BR-80240900 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Banaras Hindu Univ, Fac Sci, Inst Sci, Math Grp,Dept Phys, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Univ Tabuk, Fac Sci, Dept Biochem, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
[4] Univ Tabuk, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
[5] Univ Tabuk, Fac Sci, Dept Phys, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
[6] Univ Int la Rioja, Madrid, Spain
[7] Univ Fed Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[8] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Programa Univ Estudios Ciudad, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
来源
JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE | 2021年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
social distancing policies; COVID-19; airborne transmission; convergence and stability properties; INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.2196/20699
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Daily new COVID-19 cases from January to April 2020 demonstrate varying patterns of SARS-CoV-2 transmission across different geographical regions. Constant infection rates were observed in some countries, whereas China and South Korea had a very low number of daily new cases. In fact, China and South Korea successfully and quickly flattened their COVID-19 curve. To understand why this was the case, this paper investigated possible aerosol-forming patterns in the atmosphere and their relationship to the policy measures adopted by select countries. Objective: The main research objective was to compare the outcomes of policies adopted by countries between January and April 2020. Policies included physical distancing measures that in some cases were associated with mask use and city disinfection. We investigated whether the type of social distancing framework adopted by some countries (ie, without mask use and city disinfection) led to the continual dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 (daily new cases) in the community during the study period. Methods: We examined the policies used as a preventive framework for virus community transmission in some countries and compared them to the policies adopted by China and South Korea. Countries that used a policy of social distancing by 1-2 m were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of countries that implemented social distancing (1-2 m) only, and the second comprised China and South Korea, which implemented distancing with additional transmission/isolation measures using masks and city disinfection. Global daily case maps from Johns Hopkins University were used to provide time-series data for the analysis. Results: The results showed that virus transmission was reduced due to policies affecting SARS-CoV-2 propagation over time. Remarkably, China and South Korea obtained substantially better results than other countries at the beginning of the epidemic due to their adoption of social distancing (1-2 m) with the additional use of masks and sanitization (city disinfection). These measures proved to be effective due to the atmosphere carrier potential of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Conclusions: Our findings confirm that social distancing by 1-2 m with mask use and city disinfection yields positive outcomes. These strategies should be incorporated into prevention and control policies and be adopted both globally and by individuals as a method to fight the COVID-19 pandemic.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Impact of COVID-19 Management Policies Tailored to Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Transmission: Policy Analysis (vol 7, e20699, 2021)
    Telles, Charles Roberto
    Roy, Archisman
    Ajmal, Mohammad Rehan
    Mustafa, Syed Khalid
    Ahmad, Mohammad Ayaz
    Moises de la Serna, Juan
    Frigo, Elisandro Pires
    Hernandez Rosales, Manuel
    [J]. JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2021, 7 (05):
  • [2] Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19)
    Parvez, Mohammad K.
    Parveen, Shama
    [J]. FUTURE VIROLOGY, 2022, 17 (05) : 261 - 264
  • [3] Evidences for a possible airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the COVID-19 crisis
    Gehanno, J. F.
    Bonneterre, V.
    Andujar, P.
    Pairon, J. C.
    Paris, C.
    Petit, A.
    Verdun-Esquer, C.
    Durand-Moreau, Q.
    Brochard, P.
    [J]. ARCHIVES DES MALADIES PROFESSIONNELLES ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT, 2020, 81 (04) : 306 - 315
  • [4] Assessing the nationwide impact of COVID-19 mitigation policies on the transmission rate of SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil
    Jorge, Daniel C. P.
    Rodrigues, Moreno S.
    Silva, Mateus S.
    Cardim, Luciana L.
    da Silva, Nivea B.
    Silveira, Ismael H.
    Silva, Vivian A. F.
    Pereira, Felipe A. C.
    de Azevedo, Arthur R.
    Amad, Alan A. S.
    Pinho, Suani T. R.
    Andrade, Roberto F. S.
    Ramos, Pablo I. P.
    Oliveira, Juliane F.
    [J]. EPIDEMICS, 2021, 35
  • [5] Influence of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on COVID-19 pandemic. A review
    Domingo, Jose L.
    Marques, Montse
    Rovira, Joaquim
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 188
  • [6] A case of primary COVID-19 pneumonia: plausible airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2
    Dumont-Leblond, Nathan
    Duchaine, Caroline
    Veillette, Marc
    Pen, Visal
    Bergevin, Marco
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 27 (01)
  • [7] A case of primary COVID-19 pneumonia: plausible airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2
    Nathan Dumont-Leblond
    Caroline Duchaine
    Marc Veillette
    Visal Pen
    Marco Bergevin
    [J]. European Journal of Medical Research, 27
  • [8] Impact of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 on the placenta
    Menter, T.
    Tzankov, A.
    Bruder, E.
    [J]. PATHOLOGE, 2021, 42 (06): : 591 - 597
  • [9] Covid-19: What do we know about airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2?
    Baraniuk, Chris
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 373
  • [10] COVID-19 vaccines and decreased transmission of SARS-CoV-2
    Vitiello, A.
    Ferrara, F.
    Troiano, V
    La Porta, R.
    [J]. INFLAMMOPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 29 (05) : 1357 - 1360