Reliability and validity of the PL-C Quest, a scale designed to assess children's self-reported physical literacy

被引:18
|
作者
Barnett, Lisa M. [1 ,2 ]
Mazzoli, Emiliano [1 ,3 ]
Bowe, Steven J. [4 ]
Lander, Natalie [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Salmon, Jo [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Inst Phys Act & Nutr, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Dev, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[3] Deakin Univ, Sch Exercise & Nutr Sci, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[4] Deakin Univ, Fac Hlth, Deakin Biostat Unit, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[5] Deakin Univ, Fac Educ, Res Educ Impact, Geelong, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Scale; Self-report; Child; Measurement; REPORT CARD GRADES; FIT INDEXES; ADOLESCENTS; SENSITIVITY; COMPETENCE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102164
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: The Physical Literacy in Children Questionnaire (PL-C Quest) was developed to assess children's perceived physical literacy. Pictorial items assess 30 elements within four domains (Physical - 12 items, Psychological - 7 items, Social - 4 items and Cognitive - 7 items). The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and construct validity of the PL-C Quest in Australian children aged 7-12 years.Methods: In 2020, Australian parents and children were recruited via social media (Sample 1: n = 80) and panel sampling (Sample 2: n = 589). Parents consented online, completed demographic details and children completed the PL-C Quest online. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a sub-group of Sample 1 (n = 59). Internal consistency and construct validity [Structural Equation Modelling (SEM)] were assessed using combined samples. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) SEM was tested based on the hypothesized structure of four subdomains and a higher order factor of physical literacy.Results: Most parents were born in Australia (78%) and had a university education [University (61%), Trade (16%), High school (15%) and less than High school (8%)]. Children (59% boys; 40% girls; 1% other) had a mean age of 10.1 years (SD = 1.7). Physical literacy did not differ by age, but children of tertiary educated parents had higher physical literacy levels. Test-retest values (Mean = 15.8 days apart) were adequate to good [overall: ICC = 0.83, physical: ICC = 0.80, psychological: ICC = 0.76, social: ICC = 0.66, cognitive: ICC = 0.75]. Internal consistency values were as follows: overall: alpha = 0.92; physical: alpha = 0.82; psychological: alpha = 0.75; social: alpha = 0.72; cognitive: alpha = 0.77. All items except two loaded on sub-domains above 0.45. The final model had an adequate fit (SRMR = 0.043, CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.045).Conclusions: Results indicate the PL-C Quest has acceptable test-retest reliability and construct validity. Further research could seek to explore validity in children aged 5 and 6 years of age and in other cultural contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability of the PL-C Quest, A Scale Designed to Assess Children's Perceived Physical Literacy
    Barnett, Lisa M.
    Mazzoli, Emiliano
    Lander, Natalie
    Salmon, Jo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 43 : S8 - S8
  • [2] Development and reliability of the Physical Literacy in Children Questionnaire (PL-C Quest): A self-report scale to assess children's perceived physical literacy (vol 24, pg S8, 2021)
    Barnett, L.
    Mazzoli, E.
    Lander, N.
    Salmon, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2022, 25 (03) : E2 - E2
  • [3] Validation of the PL-C Quest in China: understanding the pictorial physical literacy self-report scale
    Wu, Yu
    Wang, Xinxiang
    Wang, Hongbiao
    Wang, Lijuan
    Tian, Ying
    Ji, Zhiguang
    Wang, Liyan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [4] Physical Literacy in Germany: PlaySelf and PL-C Quest - Same or Different?
    Schott, Nadja
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 44 : S24 - S24
  • [5] Perceived physical literacy in children and early adolescents: Two valid and reliable versions of the PL-C Quest
    Ortega-Benavent, Nuria
    Menescardi, Cristina
    Romero-Martinez, Jorge
    Barnett, Lisa M.
    Estevan, Isaac
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2024, 74
  • [6] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTED PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY IN LATINOS
    RAUH, MJD
    HOVELL, MF
    HOFSTETTER, CR
    SALLIS, JF
    GLEGHORN, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 21 (05) : 966 - 971
  • [7] Validity And Reliability Of The Self-reported Physical Fitness (srfit) Survey
    Keith, NiCole R.
    Stump, Timothy E.
    Clark, Daniel O.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2013, 45 (05): : 199 - 200
  • [8] Validity and Reliability of the Self-Reported Physical Fitness (SRFit) Survey
    Keith, NiCole R.
    Clark, Daniel O.
    Stump, Timothy E.
    Miller, Douglas K.
    Callahan, Christopher M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2014, 11 (04): : 853 - 859
  • [9] Psychometric properties and construct validity of PLAYself: a self-reported measure of physical literacy for children and youth
    Jefferies, Philip
    Bremer, Emily
    Kozera, Tanya
    Cairney, John
    Kriellaars, Dean
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2021, 46 (06) : 579 - 588
  • [10] The validity of children's self-reported exposure to traffic
    Stevenson, MR
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1996, 28 (05): : 599 - 605