Multifunctionality Concepts: A Critical Assessment of the Framework Approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Casini, Leonardo [1 ]
Lombardi, Ginevra V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Agr & Land Econ DEART, I-50144 Florence, Italy
关键词
multifunctionality; agricultural policy; environmental economics; non-commodity outputs;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-540-79470-7_3
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Multifunctionality has been the object of several studies and discussions over the past few years. This has resulted into a significant number of chapters, where the concept of multifunctionality is discussed with different approaches and interpretations according to the contexts in which the debate has been developed. The concept is generally quoted as an assumption for the acknowledgement of the primary sector's complex role for the welfare of the whole society. However, at international level the different concepts originate from a common assumption, although they do not offer an even and comprehensive focus on the issue, but rather provide an interesting overview of the concept's complexity. The chapter offers a review of some of the main aspects of the approaches adopted by some international organisations in their analysis of the multifunctionality concept. The key issues regarded as relevant in the analysis of the multifunctionality concept are organized into five defining and two application elements. The five defining elements are: (1). the purpose of the definition of multifunctionality, (2). the directly or indirectly involved parties, (3). the time horizon, (4). the space dimension of multifunctionality concept and (5). the elementary objects making up multifunctionality (functions, non commodities outputs, etc.). The two application elements are: the instruments for the assessment of the proposed functions and the instruments for the political implementation (constraint systems, targeted payments, tradable permits, auction systems, negotiation agreements, etc.). The chapter aims at reviewing the concept of multifunctionality, as it results from the different international documents, highlighting shared elements and differences in view of agricultural functions, answering the main questions: How to define different agricultural functions? How to evaluate them?
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 52
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Concepts and methods for landscape multifunctionality and a unifying framework based on ecosystem services
    Mastrangelo, Matias E.
    Weyland, Federico
    Villarino, Sebastian H.
    Barral, Maria P.
    Nahuelhual, Laura
    Laterra, Pedro
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2014, 29 (02) : 345 - 358
  • [2] Concepts and methods for landscape multifunctionality and a unifying framework based on ecosystem services
    Matias E. Mastrangelo
    Federico Weyland
    Sebastian H. Villarino
    María P. Barral
    Laura Nahuelhual
    Pedro Laterra
    Landscape Ecology, 2014, 29 : 345 - 358
  • [3] The relationship between different approaches to multifunctionality of agriculture and choice of methods: A critical review
    Korzun, Monika
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SYSTEMS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 5 (02) : 109 - 128
  • [4] Is "Multifunctionality" a Useful Framework for Plant Breeding? A Critical Analysis of the Institutional Design in Switzerland
    Mann, Stefan
    AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2013, 37 (03) : 363 - 378
  • [5] Multifunctionality goes quantum critical
    Chandra, Premala
    NATURE MATERIALS, 2019, 18 (03) : 197 - 198
  • [6] Multifunctionality goes quantum critical
    Premala Chandra
    Nature Materials, 2019, 18 : 197 - 198
  • [7] The framework and the concepts of the ICF and their implications for disability assessment
    Falez, F.
    Donceel, P.
    Brage, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 17 : 67 - 67
  • [8] Approaches to head movement: A critical assessment
    Dekany, Eva
    GLOSSA-A JOURNAL OF GENERAL LINGUISTICS, 2018, 3 (01):
  • [9] A critical assessment of approaches to outpatient monitoring
    Appelboom, Geoff
    Sussman, Eric S.
    Raphael, Pierre
    Juilliere, Yves
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    Connolly, E. Sander
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2014, 30 (07) : 1383 - 1384
  • [10] An assessment framework for inclusive education: integrating assessment approaches
    Bourke, Roseanna
    Mentis, Mandia
    ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2014, 21 (04) : 384 - 397