Surrogate Markers of Visceral Adiposity in Young Adults: Waist Circumference and Body Mass Index Are More Accurate than Waist Hip Ratio, Model of Adipose Distribution and Visceral Adiposity Index

被引:84
|
作者
Borruel, Susana [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Molto, Jose F. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Alpanes, Macarena [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fernandez-Duran, Elena [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Alvarez-Blasco, Francisco [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Luque-Ramirez, Manuel [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Escobar-Morreale, Hector F. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alcala, Dept Endocrinol & Nutr, Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Ramo & Cajal, Madrid, Spain
[3] Inst Ramon & Cajal Invest Sanitaria IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
[4] Ctr Invest Biomed Red Diabet & Enfermedades Metab, Madrid, Spain
[5] Hosp Univ 12 Octubre, Dept Radiol, Madrid, Spain
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 12期
关键词
POLYCYSTIC-OVARY-SYNDROME; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; FAT THICKNESS; RISK-FACTORS; OBESITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; WOMEN; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0114112
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Surrogate indexes of visceral adiposity, a major risk factor for metabolic and cardiovascular disorders, are routinely used in clinical practice because objective measurements of visceral adiposity are expensive, may involve exposure to radiation, and their availability is limited. We compared several surrogate indexes of visceral adiposity with ultrasound assessment of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue depots in 99 young Caucasian adults, including 20 women without androgen excess, 53 women with polycystic ovary syndrome, and 26 men. Obesity was present in 7, 21, and 7 subjects, respectively. We obtained body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-hip ratio (WHR), model of adipose distribution (MOAD), visceral adiposity index (VAI), and ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue depots and hepatic steatosis. WC and BMI showed the strongest correlations with ultrasound measurements of visceral adiposity. Only WHR correlated with sex hormones. Linear stepwise regression models including VAI were only slightly stronger than models including BMI or WC in explaining the variability in the insulin sensitivity index (yet BMI and WC had higher individual standardized coefficients of regression), and these models were superior to those including WHR and MOAD. WC showed 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.88-0.99) and BMI showed 0.91 (0.85-0.98) probability of identifying the presence of hepatic steatosis according to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. In conclusion, WC and BMI not only the simplest to obtain, but are also the most accurate surrogate markers of visceral adiposity in young adults, and are good indicators of insulin resistance and powerful predictors of the presence of hepatic steatosis.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Triglycerides and waist to height ratio are more accurate than visceral adiposity and body adiposity index to predict impaired fasting glucose
    Ivan Elizalde-Barrera, Cesar
    Francisco Rubio-Guerra, Alberto
    Juan Lozano-Nuevo, Jose
    Luis Olvera-Gomez, Jose
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 153 : 49 - 54
  • [2] Associations of body adiposity index, waist circumference, and body mass index in young adults
    Fedewa, Michael V.
    Nickerson, Brett S.
    Esco, Michael R.
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2019, 38 (02) : 715 - 720
  • [3] The Body Adiposity Index (Hip Circumference ÷ Height1.5) Is Not a More Accurate Measure of Adiposity Than Is BMI, Waist Circumference, or Hip Circumference
    Freedman, David S.
    Thornton, John C.
    Pi-Sunyer, F. Xavier
    Heymsfield, Steven B.
    Wang, Jack
    Pierson, Richard N., Jr.
    Blancki, Heidi M.
    Gallagher, Dympna
    [J]. OBESITY, 2012, 20 (12) : 2438 - 2444
  • [4] Comparisons of Visceral Adiposity Index, Body Shape Index, Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference and Their Associations with Diabetes Mellitus in Adults
    Wei, Junxiang
    Liu, Xin
    Xue, Hong
    Wang, Youfa
    Shi, Zumin
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2019, 11 (07)
  • [5] Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, Visceral Adiposity, and Cardiometabolic Risk Profile Reply
    Despres, Jean-Pierre
    Nazare, Julie-Anne
    Balkau, Beverley
    Haffner, Steven M.
    Brulle-Wohlhueter, Claire
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 116 (02): : 336 - 337
  • [6] Reply to comments on: Triglycerides and waist to height ratio are more accurate than visceral adiposity and body adiposity index to predict impaired fasting glucose
    Ivan Elizalde-Barrera, Cesar
    Francisco Rubio-Guerra, Alberto
    Juan Lozano-Nuevo, Jose
    Luis Olvera-Gomez, Jose
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 161
  • [7] Markers of adiposity in HIV/AIDS patients: Agreement between waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio and body mass index
    Dimala, Christian Akem
    Ngu, Roland Cheofor
    Kadia, Benjamin Momo
    Tianyi, Frank-Leonel
    Choukem, Simeon Pierre
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03):
  • [8] Dietary Determinants of Changes in Waist Circumference Adjusted for Body Mass Index - a Proxy Measure of Visceral Adiposity
    Romaguera, Dora
    Aengquist, Lars
    Du, Huaidong
    Jakobsen, Marianne Uhre
    Forouhi, Nita G.
    Halkjaer, Jytte
    Feskens, Edith J. M.
    van der A, Daphne L.
    Masala, Giovanna
    Steffen, Annika
    Palli, Domenico
    Wareham, Nicholas J.
    Overvad, Kim
    Tjonneland, Anne
    Boeing, Heiner
    Riboli, Elio
    Sorensen, Thorkild I. A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (07):
  • [9] New indexes of body fat distribution, visceral adiposity index, body adiposity index, waist-to-height ratio, and metabolic disturbances in the obese
    Jablonowska-Lietz, Beata
    Wrzosek, Malgorzata
    Wlodarczyk, Marta
    Nowicka, Grazyna
    [J]. KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2017, 75 (11) : 1185 - 1191
  • [10] Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference Rather Than Body Adiposity Index Are Better Surrogates for Body Adiposity in a Chinese Population
    Yu, Yunxian
    Wang, Lijuan
    Liu, Hui
    Zhang, Shanchun
    Walker, Sheila O.
    Bartell, Tami
    Wang, Xiaobin
    [J]. NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 30 (02) : 274 - 282