Analysis of percent density estimates from digital breast tomosynthesis projection images

被引:4
|
作者
Bakic, Predrag R. [1 ]
Kontos, Despina [1 ]
Zhang, Cuiping [1 ]
Yaffe, Martin J. [2 ]
Maidment, Andrew D. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Imaging Res, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
methods : quantitative image analysis; effect of physical imaging parameters; modalities : mammography; digital breast tomosynthesis; diagnostic task : risk assessment;
D O I
10.1117/12.713855
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Women with dense breasts have an increased risk of breast cancer. Breast density is typically measured as the percent density (PD), the percentage of non-fatty (i.e., dense) tissue in breast images. Mammographic PD estimates vary, in part, due to the projective nature of mammograms. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a novel radiographic method in which 3D images of the breast are reconstructed from a small number of projection (source) images, acquired at different positions of the x-ray focus. DBT provides superior visualization of breast tissue and has improved sensitivity and specificity as compared to mammography. Our long-term goal is to test the hypothesis that PD obtained from DBT is superior in estimating cancer risk compared with other modalities. As a first step, we have analyzed the PD estimates from DBT source projections since the results would be independent of the reconstruction method. We estimated PD from MLO mammograms (PDM) and from individual DBT projections (PDT). We observed good agreement between PDM and PDT from the central projection images of 40 women. This suggests that variations in breast positioning, dose, and scatter between mammography and DBT do not negatively affect PD estimation. The PDT estimated from individual DBT projections of nine women varied with the angle between the projections. This variation is caused by the 3D arrangement of the breast dense tissue and the acquisition geometry.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breast percent density estimation from 3D reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis images
    Bakic, Predrag R.
    Kontos, Despina
    Carton, Ann-Katherine
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3, 2008, 6913
  • [2] Comparison of breast percent density estimated from digital mammograms and central reconstructed tomosynthesis slice images
    Bakic, Predrag R.
    Kontos, Despina
    Troxel, Andrea B.
    Maidment, Andrew
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 674 - +
  • [3] Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images
    Reiser, I
    Nishikawa, RM
    Giger, ML
    Wu, T
    Rafferty, EA
    Moore, R
    Kopans, DB
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (02) : 482 - 491
  • [4] Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis
    Heine, John
    Fowler, Erin E. E.
    Weinfurtner, R. Jared
    Hume, Emma
    Tworoger, Shelley S.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [5] Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis
    John Heine
    Erin E. E. Fowler
    R. Jared Weinfurtner
    Emma Hume
    Shelley S. Tworoger
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13
  • [6] Breast Percent Density: Estimation on Digital Mammograms and Central Tomosynthesis Projections
    Bakic, Predrag R.
    Carton, Ann-Katherine
    Kontos, Despina
    Zhang, Cuiping
    Troxel, Andrea B.
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2009, 252 (01) : 40 - 49
  • [7] Virtual assessment of stereoscopic viewing of digital breast tomosynthesis projection images
    Wen, Gezheng
    Chang, Ho-Chang
    Reinhold, Jacob
    Lo, Joseph Y.
    Markey, Mia K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 5 (01)
  • [8] Digital breast tomosynthesis guided near infrared spectroscopy: volumetric estimates of fibroglandular fraction and breast density from tomosynthesis reconstructions
    Vedanthami, Srinivasan
    Shi, Linxi
    Michaelsed, Kelly E.
    Krishnaswamy, Venkataramanan
    Pogue, Brian W.
    Poplack'', Steven P.
    Karellasi, Andrew
    Paulsen-, Keith D.
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2015, 1 (04):
  • [9] Two-View Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening with Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images: Comparison with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Full-Field Digital Mammographic Images
    Skaane, Per
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Eben, Ellen B.
    Jebsen, Ingvild N.
    Krager, Mona
    Haakenaasen, Unni
    Ekseth, Ulrika
    Izadi, Mina
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Gullien, Randi
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2014, 271 (03) : 655 - 663
  • [10] Comparison between software volumetric breast density estimates in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography images in a large public screening cohort
    Fornvik, Daniel
    Fornvik, Hannie
    Fieselmann, Andreas
    Lang, Kristina
    Sartor, Hanna
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 330 - 336