Estimating Lung cancer risk from chest X-ray and symptoms: a prospective cohort study

被引:18
|
作者
Bradley, Stephen H. [1 ]
Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding [4 ]
Aslam, Rehima [6 ]
Bhartia, Bobby [4 ]
Callister, Matthew E. J. [5 ]
Kennedy, Martyn P. T. [5 ]
Mounce, Luke T. A. [7 ]
Shinkins, Bethany [3 ]
Hamilton, William T. [7 ]
Neal, Richard D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Primary Care Oncol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Test Evaluat Grp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Resp Med, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Calderdale Huddersfield NHS Trust, Resp Med, Huddersfield, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Univ Exeter, Coll Med & Hlth, Primary Care Diagnost, Exeter, Devon, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2021年 / 71卷 / 705期
关键词
chest x-ray; early diagnosis; general practice; lung cancer; primary care; radiograph;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp20X713993
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Chest X-ray (CXR) is the first-line investigation for lung cancer in many countries but previous research has suggested that the disease is not detected by CXR in approximately 20% of patients. The risk of lung cancer, with particular symptoms, following a negative CXR is not known. Aim To establish the sensitivity and specificity of CXR requested by patients who are symptomatic; determine the positive predictive values (PPVs) of each presenting symptom of lung cancer following a negative CXR; and determine whether symptoms associated with lung cancer are different in those who had a positive CXR result compared with those who had a negative CXR result. Design and setting A prospective cohort study was conducted in Leeds, UK, based on routinely collected data from a service that allowed patients with symptoms or lung cancer to request CXR. Method Symptom data were combined with a diagnostic category (positive or negative) for each CXR, and the sensitivity and specificity of CXR for lung cancer were calculated. The PPV of lung cancer associated with each symptom or combination of symptoms was estimated for those patients with a negative CXR. Results In total, 114(1.3%) of 8996 patients who requested a CXR were diagnosed with lung cancer within 1 year. Sensitivity was 75.4% and specificity was 90.2%. The PPV of all symptoms fir a diagnosis of lung cancer within 1 year of CXR was <1% for all individual symptoms except for haemoptysis, which had a PPV of 2.9%. PPVs for a diagnosis of lung cancer within 2 years of CXR was <1.5% for all single symptoms except for haemoptysis, which had a PPV of 3.9%. Conclusion CXR has limited sensitivity; however, in a population with a low prevalence of lung caner, its high specificity and negative predictive value means that lung cancer is very unlikely to be present following a negative result. Findings also support guidance that unexplained haemoptysis warrants urgent referral, regardless of CXR result.
引用
收藏
页码:E280 / E286
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Symptoms that predict chest X-ray results suspicious for lung cancer in UK primary care: results from a prospective study
    Brindle, L. A.
    Hamilton, W.
    Banerjee, A.
    Dowswell, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2014, 23 : 3 - 4
  • [2] A prospective cohort evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of the chest X-ray for the detection of lung cancer in symptomatic adults
    Bhartia, Bobby S. K.
    Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding
    Aslam, Rehima
    Bradley, Stephen H.
    Darby, Michael
    Hamilton, William T.
    Hurst, Emily
    Kennedy, Martyn P. T.
    Mounce, Luke T. A.
    Neal, Richard D.
    Shinkins, Bethany
    Callister, Matthew E. J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 144
  • [3] A Prospective Cohort Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of the Chest X-Ray for the Detection of Lung Cancer in Symptomatic Adults
    Hatton, N.
    Bhartia, B.
    Aslam, R.
    Bradley, S.
    Darby, M.
    Hamilton, W.
    Hurst, E.
    Kennedy, M.
    Mounce, L.
    Neil, R.
    Shinkins, B.
    Callister, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (10) : S1180 - S1181
  • [4] Is there light at the end of the tunnel; symptoms and chest x-ray help identify patients at high risk of lung cancer
    Toori, Kaleem Ullah
    Nomani, Ali Zohair
    Winson, Maxwell
    Rehman, Mati Ur
    [J]. RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 40 (01): : 14 - 17
  • [5] Chest X-ray in suspected lung cancer is harmful
    Robert W. Foley
    Vanessa Nassour
    Helen C. Oliver
    Toby Hall
    Vidan Masani
    Graham Robinson
    Jonathan C. L. Rodrigues
    Benjamin J. Hudson
    [J]. European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 6269 - 6274
  • [6] Chest X-ray in suspected lung cancer is harmful
    Foley, Robert W.
    Nassour, Vanessa
    Oliver, Helen C.
    Hall, Toby
    Masani, Vidan
    Robinson, Graham
    Rodrigues, Jonathan C. L.
    Hudson, Benjamin J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (08) : 6269 - 6274
  • [7] Chest X-ray mass in a patient with lung cancer!
    Todd, J.
    McGrath, E. E.
    [J]. QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 104 (10) : 903 - 904
  • [8] Associations of chest X-ray trajectories, smoking, and the risk of lung cancer in two population-based cohort studies
    Liu, Ya
    Feng, Zhuowei
    Fan, Zeyu
    Zhang, Yu
    Li, Chenyang
    Liu, Xiaomin
    Duan, Hongyuan
    Cui, Xiaonan
    Zhang, Liwen
    Sheng, Chao
    Yang, Lei
    Gao, Ying
    Wang, Xing
    Zhang, Qing
    Lyu, Zhangyan
    Song, Fangfang
    Huang, Yubei
    Song, Fengju
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [9] Sensitivity of chest X-ray for detecting lung cancer in people presenting with symptoms: a systematic review
    Bradley, Stephen H.
    Abraham, Sarah
    Callister, Matthew E. J.
    Grice, Adam
    Hamilton, William T.
    Lopez, Rocio Rodriguez
    Shinkins, Bethany
    Neal, Richard D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (689): : E827 - E835
  • [10] Chest X-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: a retrospective observational study
    Bradley, Stephen H.
    Bhartia, Bobby Sk
    Callister, Matthew Ej
    Hamilton, William T.
    Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding
    Kennedy, Martyn Pt
    Mounce, Luke Ta
    Shinkins, Bethany
    Wheatstone, Pete
    Neal, Richard D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2021, 71 (712): : E862 - E868