Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer

被引:1328
|
作者
Landoni, F
Maneo, A
Colombo, A
Placa, F
Milani, R
Perego, P
Favini, G
Ferri, L
Mangioni, C
机构
[1] UNIV MILAN, CLIN OSTETR GINECOL 3, MILAN, ITALY
[2] IST SCI BIOMED S GERARDO, DIV RADIOTHERAPY, MONZA, MILAN, ITALY
[3] IST SCI BIOMED S GERARDO, DEPT PATHOL, MONZA, MILAN, ITALY
[4] IST SCI BIOMED S GERARDO, DEPT RADIOL, MONZA, MILAN, ITALY
来源
LANCET | 1997年 / 350卷 / 9077期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02250-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Stage tb and Ila cervical carcinoma can be cured by radical surgery or radiotherapy. These two procedures are equally effective, but differ in associated morbidity and type of complications. In this prospective randomised trial of radiotherapy versus surgery, our aim was to assess the 5-year survival and the rate and pattern of complications and recurrences associated with each treatment. Methods Between September, 1986, and December, 1991, 469 women with newly diagnosed stage Ib and Ila cervical carcinoma were referred to our institute. 343 eligible patients were randomised: 172 to surgery and 171 to radical radiotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy was delivered after surgery for women with surgical stage pT2b or greater, less than 3 mm of safe cervical stroma, cut-through, or positive nodes. The primary outcome measures were 5-year survival and the rate of complications. The analysis of survival and recurrence was by intention to treat and analysis of complications was by treatment delivered. Findings 170 patients in the surgery group and 167 in the radiotherapy group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis; scheduled treatment was delivered to 169 and 158 women, respectively. 62 of 114 women with cervical diameters of 4 cm or smaller and 46 of 55 with diameters larger than 4 cm received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 87 (range 57-120) months, 5-year overall and disease-free survival were identical in the surgery and radiotherapy groups (83% and 74%, respectively, for both groups). 86 women developed recurrent disease: 42 (25%) in the surgery group and 44 (26%) in the radiotherapy group. Significant factors for survival in univariate and multivariate analyses were: cervical diameter, positive lymphanglography, and adeno-carcinomatous histotype. 48 (28%) surgery-group patients had severe morbidity compared with 19 (12%) radiotherapy-group patients (p=0.0004). Interpretation There is no treatment of choice for early-stage cervical carcinoma in terms of overall or disease-free survival. The combination of surgery and radiotherapy has the worst morbidity, especially urological complications. The optimum therapy for each patient should take account of clinical factors such as menopausal status, age, medical illness, histological type, and cervical diameter to yield the best cure with minimum complications.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 540
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer
    Millar, J
    LANCET, 1997, 350 (9085): : 1179 - 1179
  • [3] Radical surgery or radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer
    Soutter, P
    LANCET, 1997, 350 (9077): : 532 - 532
  • [4] Prospective multicenter study on urologic complications after radical surgery with or without radiotherapy in the treatment of stage IB-IIA cervical cancer
    Zola, P
    Maggino, T
    Sacco, M
    Rumore, A
    Sinistrero, G
    Maggi, R
    Landoni, F
    Foglia, G
    Sartori, E
    De Toffoli, J
    Franchi, M
    Romagnolo, C
    Sismondi, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2000, 10 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [5] Randomized study between radical surgery and radiotherapy for the treatment of stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: 20-year update
    Landoni, Fabio
    Colombo, Alessandro
    Milani, Rodolfo
    Placa, Franco
    Zanagnolo, Vanna
    Mangioni, Costantino
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (03)
  • [6] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery compared to radical surgery alone in bulky stage IB-IIA cervical cancer
    Behtash, N.
    Nazari, Z.
    Ayatollahi, H.
    Modarres, M.
    Ghaemmaghmi, F.
    Mousavi, A.
    EJSO, 2006, 32 (10): : 1226 - 1230
  • [7] Pattern of failure in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy
    Tisi, G
    Sartori, E
    Zanagnolo, V
    Stegher, C
    La Face, B
    Bianchi, UA
    Pecorelli, S
    7TH BIENNIAL MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL GYNECOLOGIC CANCER SOCIETY, 1999, : 485 - 488
  • [8] Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: A prospective randomized study
    Landoni, F
    Maneo, A
    Cormio, G
    Perego, P
    Milani, R
    Caruso, O
    Mangioni, C
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 80 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [9] Oncologic outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy alone after radical surgery for stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients
    Lee, Kwang-Beom
    Kim, Young Saing
    Lee, Jong-Min
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (01)
  • [10] Effect of pelvic radiotherapy on patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy: A single-center retrospective study
    Ishizawa, Chihiro
    Taguchi, Ayumi
    Tanikawa, Michihiro
    Honjo, Harunori
    Nishijima, Akira
    Eguchi, Satoko
    Miyamoto, Yuichiro
    Sone, Kenbun
    Tsuruga, Tetsushi
    Mori, Mayuyo
    Osuga, Yutaka
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 25 (03)