Role of Conventional Karyotyping in Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Modern Treatment and FISH Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Soekojo, Cinnie Yentia [1 ]
Wang, Guo-miao [2 ]
Chen, Yunxin [3 ]
Casan, Joshua [4 ]
Wolyncewicz, Grace [4 ]
Lin, Adeline [1 ]
Poon, Li Mei [1 ]
de Mel, Sanjay [1 ]
Koh, Liang Piu [1 ]
Tan, Lip Kun [1 ]
Ooi, Melissa G. [1 ]
Nagarajan, Chandramouli [3 ]
Liu, Yang [2 ]
Lai, Yue-yun [2 ]
Hu, Xiao-Jun [2 ]
Spencer, Andrew [4 ]
Gopalakrishnan, Sathish Kumar [3 ]
Lu, Jin [2 ]
Chng, Wee Joo [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Natl Univ Canc Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Peking Univ, Inst Hematol, 11 Xizhimen South St, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Hematol, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Alfred Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Canc Sci Inst Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Med, Singapore, Singapore
来源
CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA | 2019年 / 19卷 / 08期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Chromosomal abnormalities; Cytogenetics; Myeloma; Prognosis; Survival; INTERNATIONAL STAGING SYSTEM; PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR; HYPODIPLOIDY; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clml.2019.04.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In an evaluation of 683 patients with myeloma, we showed that the non-hyperdiploid karyotype leads to a worsening of overall survival in patients with Revised International Staging System stage II disease, upstaging this group of patients to overall survival similar to that of patients with Revised International Staging System stage III disease. We also showed that conventional karyotyping is able to predict high-risk patients with multiple myeloma when fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis is not available. Background: The Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) has been widely adopted to prognosticate multiple myeloma. As a result, the continued utility of conventional metaphase karyotyping has been called into question. Patients and Methods: A multi-center study for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma who received novel agent(s) at induction was conducted. Conventional metaphase karyotype information was categorized based on ploidy. We evaluated the impact of ploidy on overall survival (OS) including multivariate analysis, taking into account the R-ISS stages, transplant status, age, and novel agent(s) used at induction. We also evaluated if it is possible to identify high-risk (HR) patients with conventional karyotyping when a fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis is not available. Results were validated in an independent cohort. Results: There were 308 patients evaluable. Ploidy significantly affected the OS of patients with R-ISS stage II, with non-hyperdiploid patients doing the worst. In the multivariate analysis, ploidy was significantly associated with OS. R-ISS stage II patients with or without nonhyperdiploid karyotype had significantly different survival. We replaced HR fluorescence in situ hybridization abnormalities with HR metaphase karyotypic abnormalities (non-hyperdiploid karyotype). When compared with R-ISS, there was a high level of concordance in HR patients identified using HR karyotypic abnormalities. These results were validated with an independent cohort of 375 patients. Conclusion: Conventional metaphase karyotyping is an independent prognostic factor even in the setting of R-ISS. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E470 / E477
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identification of the true hyperdiploid multiple myeloma subset by combining conventional karyotyping and FISH analysis
    Barila, Gregorio
    Bonaldi, Laura
    Grassi, Angela
    Martines, Annalisa
    Lico, Albana
    Macri, Nadia
    Nalio, Silvia
    Pavan, Laura
    Berno, Tamara
    Branca, Antonio
    Calabretto, Giulia
    Carrino, Marilena
    Teramo, Antonella
    Manni, Sabrina
    Piazza, Francesco
    Semenzato, Gianpietro
    Zambello, Renato
    [J]. BLOOD CANCER JOURNAL, 2020, 10 (02)
  • [2] Identification of the true hyperdiploid multiple myeloma subset by combining conventional karyotyping and FISH analysis
    Gregorio Barilà
    Laura Bonaldi
    Angela Grassi
    Annalisa Martines
    Albana Liço
    Nadia Macrì
    Silvia Nalio
    Laura Pavan
    Tamara Berno
    Antonio Branca
    Giulia Calabretto
    Marilena Carrino
    Antonella Teramo
    Sabrina Manni
    Francesco Piazza
    Gianpietro Semenzato
    Renato Zambello
    [J]. Blood Cancer Journal, 10
  • [3] Thrombosis in the modern era of multiple myeloma
    Rubinstein, Samuel M.
    Tuchman, Sascha A.
    [J]. BLOOD, 2020, 136 (09) : 1019 - 1021
  • [4] Treatment of Multiple Myeloma and the Role of Melphalan in the Era of Modern Therapies-Current Research and Clinical Approaches
    Poczta, Anastazja
    Rogalska, Aneta
    Marczak, Agnieszka
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (09)
  • [5] Dose Selection for Multiple Myeloma in Modern Era
    Wang, Shutao
    Salgado, Lucas Resende
    Adler, Ava
    Chang, Sanders
    Ru, Meng
    Moshier, Erin
    Dharmarajan, Kavita
    Cho, Hearn Jay
    Bakst, Richard L.
    [J]. PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9 (04) : E400 - E406
  • [6] Conventional Karyotyping and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma
    Crabtree, Matthew
    Cai, Jennifer
    Qing, Xin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2022, 11 (03) : 87 - 91
  • [7] Conventional Karyotyping Is Still an Important Prognostic Marker for Myeloma in the Era of R-ISS Staging
    Soekojo, Cinnie Yentia
    Wang, Guomiao
    Chen, Yunxin
    Casan, Joshua
    Wolyncewicz, Grace
    Lin, Adeline
    Poon, L. M.
    Koh, Liang Piu
    Tan, Lip Kun
    Ooi, Melissa
    Liu, Yang
    Huang, Xiao-Jun
    Spencer, Andrew
    Kumar, Sathish
    Lu, Jin
    Chng, Wee Joo
    [J]. BLOOD, 2017, 130
  • [8] Kidney Transplant in the Era of Modern Therapy for Multiple Myeloma
    Huskey, Janna L.
    Heilman, Raymond L.
    Khamash, Hasan
    Fonseca, Rafael
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 (12) : 1994 - 2001
  • [9] Cellular immunity in the era of modern multiple myeloma therapy
    Liu, Zhaoyun
    Zhao, Xianghong
    Shen, Hongli
    Liu, Xiaohan
    Xu, Xintong
    Fu, Rong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 153 (08) : 1436 - 1447
  • [10] Association of Genetic Variants with FISH-Based Karyotyping Status in Multiple Myeloma Patients
    Johnson, D. C.
    Ross, F. M.
    Dickens, N. J.
    Davies, F. E.
    Child, J. A.
    Durie, B.
    Van Ness, B.
    Morgan, G. J.
    [J]. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA & MYELOMA, 2009, 9 : S132 - S133