State Capacity and Innovation Policy Performance: A Comparative Study on Two Types of Innovation Projects in China

被引:4
|
作者
Feng, Kaidong [1 ]
Jiang, Ziying [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Govt, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
state capacity; innovation policy; explicit indicators; implicit indicators; transitional economy; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; LOCAL STATE; PATENT; RIGHTS; REFORM; FIRM;
D O I
10.1111/ropr.12420
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This study analyzes state capacity by comparing two types of innovation policies in China and estimating its impacts on policy performance. State capacity is defined as the extent to which the state can realize its objectives in policy and it is determined by government professionalism and penetration into industrial activities. Due to both the lack of channels to grasp information regarding complicated innovation processes and professional personnel capable of understanding such information, the state capacity demonstrated in these policies is low. The government relies more on indicators of innovation quantity rather than those of innovation quality as criteria for identifying innovation. This leads to poor policy performances in which grantees tend to meet only the qualitative requirements of the policies, namely increasing the number of patents, rather than engaging in genuine innovation and pursuing the essential objective of the policies. Therefore, even with market-oriented reform, transitional economies like China still need to strengthen state building for achieving policy objectives.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 453
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INNOVATION STIMULANTS, INNOVATION CAPACITY, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
    Chen, Hong Long
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 15 (02) : 212 - 231
  • [2] Types of regional innovation systems and innovation policy in China
    Tian, Hua
    Zhang, Xuewen
    [J]. ISMOT'07: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2: MANAGING TOTAL INNOVATION AND OPEN INNOVATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2007, : 1600 - 1604
  • [3] Innovation policy configuration - a comparative study of Russia and China
    Li, Fan
    Butel, Lynne
    Wang, Peijie
    [J]. POLICY STUDIES, 2017, 38 (04) : 311 - 338
  • [4] Public sector innovation in context: A comparative study of innovation types
    Cinar, Emre
    Simms, Christopher
    Trott, Paul
    Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 26 (01) : 265 - 292
  • [5] State Capacity in China's Innovation Subsidy Policy: A Perspective on Government Knowledge
    Feng, Kaidong
    Jiang, Ziying
    [J]. CHINA REVIEW-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL ON GREATER CHINA, 2021, 21 (03): : 89 - 122
  • [6] The state of the field for governance and policy innovation in China
    Teets, Jessica C.
    Noesselt, Nele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHINESE GOVERNANCE, 2020, 5 (04) : 413 - 418
  • [7] Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: An empirical study
    Lau, Antonio K. W.
    Lo, William
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 92 : 99 - 114
  • [8] Innovation as a state policy
    [J]. Carreteras, 2019, 4 (225):
  • [9] Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance
    Prajogo, Daniel I.
    Ahmed, Pervaiz K.
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2006, 36 (05) : 499 - 515
  • [10] Innovation Network, Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Performance
    Huo Wenjuan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH (2014) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FINANCIAL RISK AND CORPORATE FINANCE MANAGEMENT, VOLS. I AND II, 2014, : 245 - 250