COOMET.PR-K3.a comparison of luminous intensity

被引：1
|
作者：
Khlevnoy, B. [1 ]
Tarasova, O. [2 ]
Scums, D. [2 ]
Gorshkova, T. [1 ]
Ivashin, E. [1 ]
Krempasky, M. [3 ]
Kupko, A. [4 ]
Vyrodova, N. [5 ]
Woolliams, E. [6 ]
机构：
[1] All Russian Res Inst Opt & Phys Measurement VNIOF, Ozernaya 46, Moscow 119361, Russia
[2] Belarussian State Inst Metrol BelGIM Starovilensk, Minsk 220053, BELARUS
[3] Slovak Inst Metrol SMU, Karloveska 63, Bratislava 84255, Slovakia
[4] Natl Sci Ctr, Inst Metrol, Mironositska 42, UA-61002 Kharkiv, Ukraine
[5] Kazakhstan Inst Metrol KazInMetr, Mangilik El Str 11,Left Bank,Reference Ctr Bldg, Esil Dist, Kazakhstan
[6] Natl Phys Lab, Hampton Rd, Teddington TW11 0LW, Middx, England
来源：
METROLOGIA | 2020年 / 57卷 / 1A期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/02002
中图分类号：
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号：
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要：
This report gives the results of the COOMET.PR-K3 comparison of luminous intensity. Five laboratories took part in the comparison. COOMET.PR-K3 was piloted by Belarusian State Institute of Metrology (BelGIM). The linkage to KCRV was provided through the participation of the All-Russian Research Institute for Optical and Physical measurement (VNIIOFI) and Slovak Institute of Metrology (SMU). Other participants were National Scientific Center "Institute of Metrology" (NSC IM), Ukraine and Kazakhstan Institute of Metrology (KazInMetr). BelGIM, NSC IM and KazInMetr were non-linked laboratories. A set of three incandescent lamps was used as traveling comparison artefact. Degrees of equivalence of all three non-linked laboratories were within their expanded uncertainties. Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCPR, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA). © 2020 Institute of Physics Publishing. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bilateral key comparison on luminous flux COOMET.PR-K4.1. final report
    Huriev, M.
    Khlevnoy, B.
    Tolstykh, G.
    Ivashin, E.
    Gorchkova, T.
    METROLOGIA, 2017, 54
  • [2] EURAMET Key-Comparison Luminous Intensity EURAMET.PR-K3.a Final Report, May 2014
    Sperling, A.
    Sauter, G.
    Lindner, D.
    Eltmann, M.
    METROLOGIA, 2014, 51
  • [3] Luminous intensity EURAMET.PR-K3.a final report, May 2014
    1600, IOP Publishing Ltd (51):
  • [4] Report on supplementary comparison COOMET.PR-S3: refractive index
    Vishnyakov, Gennady
    Fricke, Andreas
    Parkhomenko, Nataliya M.
    Hori, Yasuaki
    Pisani, Marco
    METROLOGIA, 2016, 53
  • [5] Final Report of the APMP Comparison of Luminous Responsivity APMP.PR-K3.b
    Gardner, J. L.
    Atkinson, E.
    METROLOGIA, 2004, 41
  • [6] Bilateral comparison of luminous flux (EURAMET.PR-K4.3)
    Pons, Alicia
    Campos, Joaquin
    Sametoglu, Ferhat
    METROLOGIA, 2019, 56 (1A)
  • [7] Final report on COOMET key comparison of power (COOMET.EM-K5)
    Velychko, Oleh
    Karpenko, Stanislav
    METROLOGIA, 2019, 56 (1A)
  • [8] COOMET key comparison COOMET.PR-K1.b.1 spectral irradiance 200 nm to 350 nm. Final report
    Khlevnoy, B.
    Solodilov, M.
    Sperfeld, P.
    Pape, S.
    METROLOGIA, 2019, 56 (1A)
  • [9] APMP Comparison on Luminous Flux Units (APMP.PR-K4)
    Hui, Liu
    Lin YanDong
    Yang ChenZhu
    Jing, Yu
    METROLOGIA, 2018, 55
  • [10] Comparison of luminous intensity distributions
    Gassmann, F.
    Krueger, U.
    Bergen, T.
    Schmidt, F.
    LIGHTING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 49 (01) : 62 - 83
12345