Energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions in an agroforestry system-a case study from Eastern Germany

被引:4
|
作者
Kanzler, Michael [1 ]
Boehm, Christian [1 ]
Domin, Thomas [2 ]
Freese, Dirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Brandenburg Univ Technol Cottbus Senftenberg, Dept Soil Protect & Recultivat, Cottbus, Germany
[2] Landwirtschaftsbetrieb Domin, Peickwitz, Germany
关键词
Energy input; sustainable land use; energy efficiency; extensification;
D O I
10.1080/21683565.2021.1871697
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Following a cradle-to-farm-gate approach, we determined the input of fossil energy and greenhouse gas emissions (GGE) for conventional and agroforestry land use on a farm in a low profit region of Germany. On the basis of a calculation model with a recurring crop rotation of maize, rye, oat, and a catch crop mixture, it was found that a short rotation alley cropping system (SRACS) with a 10% (A10) and a 40% (A40) tree area for bioenergy production consumed 7% and 32% less fossil energy than the conventionally managed site (C). Simultaneously, the net energy gains and energy efficiency of the plant production process were increased by up to 8 and 53%, respectively. Likewise, the operational GGE accumulated to 3.1 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1) under C farming and could be reduced by 9% and 36% in A10 and A40, respectively. Overall, a multidimensional land use indicator comparison proved that under specific site conditions agroforestry land use can increase the energy output per unit of land area, while the energy input and GGE per metric ton of biomass yield were considerably lower than in C farming. Nominal range sensitivity analysis revealed that the energetic and ecological performance of the system was highly sensitive to the size and productivity of the tree area as well as to the use of fertilizers. Our findings suggest that SRACS may fundamentally improve the environmental and energetic performance of the cultivation process on marginal land, without leading to substantial losses in agricultural livestock production area.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:868 / 891
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Greenhouse gas emissions in an agroforestry system of the southeastern USA
    Franzluebbers, Alan J.
    Chappell, Janet C.
    Shi, Wei
    Cubbage, Frederick W.
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2017, 108 (01) : 85 - 100
  • [2] Greenhouse gas emissions in an agroforestry system of the southeastern USA
    Alan J. Franzluebbers
    Janet C. Chappell
    Wei Shi
    Frederick W. Cubbage
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2017, 108 : 85 - 100
  • [3] Energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions: agricutural perspectives
    Reau, Raymond
    OCL-OILSEEDS AND FATS CROPS AND LIPIDS, 2006, 13 (2-3) : 117 - 120
  • [4] Energy Balance and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Cherry Production in Turkey
    Gokdogan, Osman
    Demir, Cihan
    Baran, Mehmet Firat
    APPLIED FRUIT SCIENCE, 2024, 66 (04) : 1269 - 1274
  • [5] Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance of palm oil biofuel
    de Souza, Simone Pereira
    Pacca, Sergio
    de Avila, Marcio Turra
    Borges, Jose Luiz B.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2010, 35 (11) : 2552 - 2561
  • [6] Energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions from the production and sequestration of charcoal from agricultural residues
    Thakkar, Jignesh
    Kumar, Amit
    Ghatora, Sonia
    Canter, Christina
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 94 : 558 - 567
  • [7] Determination of Energy Balance and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) of Cotton Cultivation in Turkey: A Case Study from Bismil District of Diyarbakir Province
    Baran, Mehmet Firat
    Gokdogan, Osman
    Bayhan, Yilmaz
    JOURNAL OF TEKIRDAG AGRICULTURE FACULTY-TEKIRDAG ZIRAAT FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2021, 18 (02): : 322 - 332
  • [8] An Investigation on the Energy Balance and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Orange Production in Turkey
    Saltuk, Burak
    Jagosz, Barbara
    Gokdogan, Osman
    Rolbiecki, Roman
    Atilgan, Atilgan
    Rolbiecki, Stanislaw
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (22)
  • [9] The impact of demographic change on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Germany
    Kronenberg, Tobias
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (10) : 2637 - 2645