Ambulatory labor epidural analgesia: Bupivacaine versus ropivacaine

被引:67
|
作者
Campbell, DC [1 ]
Zwack, RM [1 ]
Crone, LAL [1 ]
Yip, RW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Royal Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W8, Canada
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2000年 / 90卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200006000-00023
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Dilute concentrations of bupivacaine combined with fentanyl have recently been used to initiate labor epidural analgesia in an attempt to balance adequate analgesia and minimal maternal motorblockade. Similar concentrations of ropivacaine have not been evaluated. This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was designed to compare the efficacy of 20 mL of either 0.08% bupivacaine plus 2 mu g/mL fentanyl or 0.08% ropivacaine plus 2 mu g/mL fentanyl to initiate ambulatory labor epidural analgesia. Forty nulliparous women in early (less than or equal to 5 cm) established labor received either 20 mt of 0.08% bupivacaine plus 2 mu g/mL fentanyl (BF) or 0.08% ropivacaine plus 2 mu g/mL fentanyl (RF) to initiate epidural analgesia. One woman (BF) required supplemental analgesia, and two (one BF and one RF) had visual analog scale scores > 0 but < 20 at 20 min. The time (mean +/-SD) to visual analog scale score = 0 was BF (n = 18):12.0 +/- 4.5 min and RF (n = 19): 12.4 +/- 4.0 min (P > 0.05). Spontaneous micturition was observed in 65% (13 of 20) BF compared with 100% (20 of 20) RF (P < 0.01), and ambulation was demonstrated in 75% (15 of 20) BF compared with 100% (20 of 20) RF (P < 0.03). The incidence of forceps delivery was 35% (7 of 20) BF compared with 10% (2 of 20) RF (P < 0.04). The results of this study indicate that dilute ropivacaine combined with fentanyl effectively initiates epidural analgesia while concurrently preserving maternal ability to void and ambulate.
引用
收藏
页码:1384 / 1389
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ambulatory labor epidural analgesia: Bupivacaine versus ropivacaine
    Zwack, R
    Campbell, DC
    Sawatzky, K
    Crone, LA
    Yip, RW
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999,
  • [2] Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia
    Beilin, Yaakov
    Halpern, Stephen
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 111 (02): : 482 - 487
  • [3] Labor outcomes with bupivacaine and ropivacaine used for epidural analgesia
    Finegold, H
    Ramanathan, S
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (3A) : U212 - U212
  • [4] Efficacy of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine for labor epidural analgesia
    Sah, Neera
    Vallejo, Manuel
    Phelps, Amy
    Finegold, Helene
    Mandell, Gordon
    Ramanathan, Sivam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2007, 19 (03) : 214 - 217
  • [5] 0.075% epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine are clinically indistinguishable for labor analgesia
    Smith, T
    Thomas, JA
    Owen, MD
    Harris, LC
    D'Angelo, RD
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, : U8 - U8
  • [6] 0.075% epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine produce indistinguishable labor analgesia
    Smith, T
    Thomas, JA
    Owen, MD
    Harris, LC
    D'Angelo, R
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (3A) : U213 - U213
  • [7] Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor
    Polley, LS
    Columb, MO
    Naughton, NN
    Wagner, DS
    van de Ven, CJM
    Dorantes, DM
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (2S): : U235 - U235
  • [8] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with 0.0625% ropivacaine versus bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor
    Smiley, RM
    Kim-Lo, SH
    Goodman, SR
    Jackson, MA
    Landau, R
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (3A) : U213 - U213
  • [9] A comparison of epidural analgesia with 0.125% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor
    Meister, GC
    D'Angelo, R
    Owen, M
    Nelson, KE
    Gaver, R
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (03): : 632 - 637
  • [10] Comparison of 0.255% ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia for labor and vaginal delivery
    Gaiser, RR
    Venkateswaren, P
    Cheek, TG
    Persiley, E
    Buxbaum, J
    Hedge, J
    Joyce, TH
    Gutsche, BB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1997, 9 (07) : 564 - 568