The panel interview: A review of empirical research and guidelines for practice

被引:15
|
作者
Dixon, M [1 ]
Wang, S
Calvin, J
Dineen, B
Tomlinson, E
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Educ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Coll Business, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/009102600203100310
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
After over 50 years of research, the panel interview remains an important yet controversial tool for personnel selection. Previous narrative and meta-analytic reviews have yielded conflicting results concerning its reliability and predictive validity. Furthermore,,no review has focused exclusively on the panel interview. By examining the features and psychometric property of the panel interview, we can not only add to the scholarly literature but also determine important, research-based applications for the practitioner. We have derived an eight-step panel interview procedure from previous research. Utilizing this procedure as an organizing framework, this review highlights various features of the panel interview including: setting, structure and scoring anchors, question type, training, and rating combination method. Each of these features is discussed in terms of interview trends and in relation to reliability and validity. Practical implications and directions for future research also are addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 428
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research into practice - review of practice guidelines
    Barker, L.
    Lovegrove, R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2016, 79 : 64 - 64
  • [2] RESEARCH FINDINGS AND CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES: A REVIEW
    Wong, M.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 50 : 57 - 57
  • [3] Review of Empirical Research on Child Custody Practice
    Bow, James N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD CUSTODY, 2006, 3 (01): : 23 - 50
  • [4] A panel interview on the ethical practice of neuropsychology
    Bush, Shane S.
    Grote, Christopher L.
    Johnson-Greene, Doug E.
    Macartney-Filgate, Michele
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2008, 22 (02): : 321 - 344
  • [5] Visual methods in practice and research: a review of empirical support
    Mahadevappa, Manjunatha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 18 (06): : 350 - 350
  • [6] A systematic review of empirical research into ethics in general practice
    Rogers, WA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1997, 47 (424): : 733 - 737
  • [7] Plain language summaries: A systematic review of theory, guidelines and empirical research
    Stoll, Marlene
    Kerwer, Martin
    Lieb, Klaus
    Chasiotis, Anita
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (06):
  • [8] Forecasting practice: A review of the empirical literature and an agenda for future research
    Winklhofer, H
    Diamantopoulos, A
    Witt, SF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1996, 12 (02) : 193 - 221
  • [9] Visual methods in practice and research: a review of empirical support COMMENT
    Brouwers, Jakko
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 18 (06): : 349 - 349
  • [10] Panel discussion -: Bringing practice guidelines to patients
    McGivney, WT
    Gansler, TS
    McDonald, CJ
    Music, T
    Smith, ML
    Tempero, M
    Thompson, KM
    [J]. ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 1999, 13 (11A): : 359 - 363