Prospective preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging by integrated positron emission tomography-computerised tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

被引:57
|
作者
Perigaud, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Bridji, Boumediene [3 ]
Roussel, Jean Christian [1 ,2 ]
Sagan, Christine [2 ,4 ]
Mugniot, Antoine [1 ,2 ]
Duveau, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Baron, Olivier [1 ,2 ]
Despins, Philippe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CHU Nantes, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Inst Thorax, F-44035 Nantes 01, France
[2] Univ Nantes, Fac Med, Nantes, France
[3] Ctr Rene Gauducheau, Dept Nucl Med, St Herblain, France
[4] CHU Nantes, Dept Pathol, F-44035 Nantes 01, France
关键词
Integrated PET-CT; Lung cancer; Mediastinal lymph node; Staging; STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUE; FDG-PET; CT; CHEMOTHERAPY; INVOLVEMENT; SCAN; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.044
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Mediastinal. lymph node staging determines the treatment strategy for non-small-cell lung cancer. This study aims to evaluate prospectively the accuracy of preoperative integrated 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computerised tomography ((18)FDG PET-CT) for mediastinal lymph node staging. Methods: Preoperative integrated (18)FDG PET-CT was used to analyse mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Nodal stations were identified according to the American Thoracic Society mapping system. Lymph nodes with a standardised uptake value (SUVmax) >3 were considered to be positive. The mediastinal lymph nodes were harvested during lung resection and the results of integrated (18)FDG PET-CT were compared to the mediastinal lymph node histology results. Results: A total of 51 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean interval between integrated (18)FDG PET-CT and surgery was 31 +/- 15.8 days (range: 2-78 days). The mean mediastinal lymph node harvested and station number per patient during surgery were 11.8 +/- 5.6 (range: 2-27) and 3.8 +/- 1 (range: 2-6), respectively. The incidence of N2 pathological disease was 19.6%. The integrated (18)FDG PET-CT sensitivity and specificity were 40 +/- 30% and 85 +/- 11%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 40 +/- 30% and 85 +/- 11%, respectively. False-positive results (six patients) were mainly due to inflammatory lymph nodes. False-negative results (six patients) were mainly due to infra-centimetrical, malignant lymph node invasion. Conclusion: The sensitivity of integrated (18)FDG PET-CT for mediastinal lymph node staging in patients selected for surgery is low. When positive mediastinal lymph nodes are detected, invasive mediastinal staging must be performed. On the other hand, the specificity is high: patients with negative integrated (18)FDG PET-CT can be operated upon without invasive mediastinal staging. (C) 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 736
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mediastinal lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: A prospective comparison of computed tomography and positron emission tomography
    Scott, WJ
    Gobar, LS
    Terry, JD
    Dewan, NA
    Sunderland, JJ
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 111 (03): : 642 - 648
  • [2] The role of positron emission tomography in mediastinal lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer
    Melek, Huseyin
    Kavakli, Kuthan
    Gunluoglu, M. Zeki
    TURK GOGUS KALP DAMAR CERRAHISI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 19 (03): : 480 - 481
  • [3] Mediastinal lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: A prospective comparison of computed tomography and positron emission tomography - Discussion
    Rusch, VW
    Scott, WJ
    Warren, WH
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 111 (03): : 648 - 648
  • [4] Preoperative intrathoracic lymph node staging in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography
    Bille, Andrea
    Pelosi, Ettore
    Skanjeti, Andrea
    Arena, Vincenzo
    Errico, Luca
    Borasio, Piero
    Mancini, Maurizio
    Ardissone, Francesco
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 36 (03) : 440 - 445
  • [5] Integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography in preoperative lymph node staging of non-small cell lung cancer
    Xu Na
    Wang Mengzhao
    Zhu Zhaohui
    Zhang Yingqiang
    Jiao Yang
    Fang Weigang
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 127 (04) : 607 - 613
  • [6] Integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography in preoperative lymph node staging of non-small cell lung cancer
    Xu Na
    Wang Mengzhao
    Zhu Zhaohui
    Zhang Yingqiang
    Jiao Yang
    Fang Weigang
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2014, 127 (04) : 607 - 613
  • [7] Mediastinal lymph node staging by means of positron emission tomography is less sensitive in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
    Al-Sarraf, Nael
    Gately, Kathy
    Lucey, Julie
    Wilson, Lorraine
    McGovern, Eillish
    Young, Vincent
    CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2008, 9 (01) : 39 - 43
  • [8] MEDIASTINAL STAGING OF NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER WITH POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY
    CHIN, R
    WARD, R
    KEYES, JW
    CHOPLIN, RH
    REED, JC
    WALLENHAUPT, S
    HUDSPETH, AS
    HAPONIK, EF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 152 (06) : 2090 - 2096
  • [9] Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography
    Lardinois, D
    Weder, W
    Hany, TF
    Kamel, EM
    Korom, S
    Seifert, B
    von Schulthess, GK
    Steinert, HC
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (25): : 2500 - 2507
  • [10] Combined Endosonographic Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging in Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Node-Negative Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in High-Risk Patients
    Hegde, Pravachan
    Molina, Juan Carlos
    Thivierge-Southidara, Maureen
    Jain, Ratnali Vipul
    Gowda, Akshatha
    Ferraro, Pasquale
    Liberman, Moishe
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 32 (01) : 162 - 168