Mathematical modeling of MILD combustion of pulverized coal

被引:165
|
作者
Schaffel, N. [1 ,2 ]
Mancini, M. [1 ]
Szlek, A. [2 ]
Weber, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Clausthal, Inst Energy Proc Engn & Fuel Technol, D-38678 Clausthal Zellerfeld, Germany
[2] Silesian Tech Univ, Inst Thermal Technol, PL-44101 Gliwice, Poland
关键词
MILD (flameless) combustion; Coal combustion; NOx emissions; CFD; CHEMICAL PERCOLATION MODEL; HIGH-TEMPERATURE AIR; NATURAL-GAS; DEVOLATILIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.04.008
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
MILD (flameless) combustion is a new rapidly developing technology. The IFRF trials have demonstrated high potential of this technology also for N-containing fuels. In this work the IFRF experiments are analyzed using the CFD-based mathematical model. Both the Chemical Percolation Devolatilization (CPD) model and the char combustion intrinsic reactivity model have been adapted to Guasare coal combusted. The flow-field as well as the temperature and the oxygen fields have been accurately predicted by the CFD-based model. The predicted temperature and gas composition fields have been uniform demonstrating that slow combustion occurs in the entire furnace Volume. The CFD-based predictions have highlighted the No-x, reduction potential of MILD combustion through the following mechanism. Before the coal devolatilization proceeds, the coal jet entrains a Substantial amount of flue gas so that its oxygen content is typically not higher than 3-5%. The volatiles are given off in a highly sub-stoichiometric environment and their N-containing species are preferentially converted to molecular nitrogen rather than to NO. Furthermore, there exists a strong NO-reburning mechanism within the fuel jet and in the air jet downstream of the position where these two jets merge. In other words, less NO is formed from combustion of volatiles and stronger NO-reburning mechanisms exist in the MILD combustion if compared to conventional coil combustion technology. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Combustion Institute.
引用
收藏
页码:1771 / 1784
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mathematical simulation of pulverized coal in combustion chamber
    Askarova, A. S.
    Bolegenova, S. A.
    Maximov, V. Yu.
    Bekmuhamet, A.
    [J]. CHISA 2012, 2012, 42 : 1150 - 1156
  • [2] Influence of turbulence-chemical interaction on CFD pulverized coal MILD combustion modeling
    Vascellari, M.
    Cau, G.
    [J]. FUEL, 2012, 101 : 90 - 101
  • [3] IMPROVED MODELING OF PULVERIZED COAL COMBUSTION IN A FURNACE
    JANG, DS
    ACHARYA, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1988, 110 (02): : 124 - 132
  • [4] MATHEMATICAL-MODELING OF COMBUSTION IN BLAST-FURNACE RACEWAYS, INCLUDING INJECTION OF PULVERIZED COAL
    JAMALUDDIN, AS
    WALL, TF
    TRUELOVE, JS
    [J]. IRONMAKING & STEELMAKING, 1986, 13 (02) : 91 - 99
  • [5] Mathematical model for heat transfer and combustion in a pulverized coal flame
    M. Yu. Chernetskii
    A. A. Dekterev
    [J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2011, 47 : 280 - 288
  • [6] Verification of the Mathematical Model of Pulverized Coal Combustion in Swirl Burners
    Saljnikov, Aleksandar
    Komatina, Mirko
    Goricanec, Darko
    [J]. FME TRANSACTIONS, 2006, 34 (01): : 45 - 52
  • [7] Mathematical model for heat transfer and combustion in a pulverized coal flame
    Chernetskiy, M. Yu.
    Dekterev, A. A.
    [J]. COMBUSTION EXPLOSION AND SHOCK WAVES, 2011, 47 (03) : 280 - 288
  • [8] A mathematical model of ash formation during pulverized coal combustion
    Yan, L
    Gupta, RP
    Wall, TF
    [J]. FUEL, 2002, 81 (03) : 337 - 344
  • [9] Verification of the mathematical model of pulverized coal combustion in swirl burners
    Saljnikov, A
    Oka, S
    Sijercic, M
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL FURNACES AND BOILERS, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 487 - 496
  • [10] MATHEMATICAL-MODELING OF SWIRLING FLAMES OF PULVERIZED COAL - WHAT CAN COMBUSTION ENGINEERS EXPECT FROM MODELING
    WEBER, R
    PETERS, AAF
    BREITHAUPT, PP
    VISSER, BM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1995, 117 (02): : 289 - 297