Clinical audit in gynecological cancer surgery: Development of a risk scoring system to predict adverse events

Background. Advanced gynecological surgery undertaken in a specialized gynecologic oncology unit may be associated with significant perioperative morbidity. Validated risk prediction models are available for general surgical specialties but Currently not for gynecological cancer Surgery. Objective, The objective of this Study was to evaluate risk factors for adverse events (AEs) of patients treated for suspected or proven gynecological cancer and to develop a clinical risk score (RS) to predict Such AEs. Methods. AEs were prospectively recorded and matched with demographical, clinical and histopathological data oil 369 patients who had an abdominal or laparoscopic procedure for proven OF suspected gynecological cancer at a tertiary gynecological cancer center. Stepwise multiple logistic regression was used to determine the best predictors of AEs. For the risk score (RS), the coefficients from the model were scaled using a factor of 2 and Founded to the nearest integer to derive the risk points. Sum of all the risk points form the RS. Results. Ninety-five patients (25.8%) had at least one AE. Twenty-nine (7.9%) and 77 (20.9%) patients experienced intra- and postoperative AEs respectively with 11 patients (3.0%) experiencing both. The independent predictors for any AE were complexity of the surgical procedure, elevated SGOT(serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, >= 35 U/L), higher ASA scores and overweight. The risk score can vary from 0 to 14. The risk for developing any AE is described by the formula 100 / (1 + e((3.697) (-) ((RS/2)))). Conclusion. RS allows for quantification of the risk for AEs. Risk factors are generally not modifiable with the possible exception of obesity. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.