Assessment of breast positioning criteria in mammographic screening: Agreement between artificial intelligence software and radiographers

被引:13
|
作者
Waade, Gunvor G. [1 ,2 ]
Danielsen, Anders Skyrud [1 ,3 ]
Holen, Asne S. [1 ]
Larsen, Marthe [1 ]
Hanestad, Berit [4 ]
Hopland, Nina-Merete [4 ]
Kalcheva, Vanya [4 ]
Hofvind, Solveig [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Canc Registry Norway, Sect Breast Canc Screening, Oslo, Norway
[2] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Oslo, Norway
[3] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Infect Control & Preparedness, Oslo, Norway
[4] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Radiol, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Artificial intelligence; breast neoplasm; breast screening; mammography; radiography;
D O I
10.1177/0969141321998718
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine the agreement between artificial intelligence software (AI) and radiographers in assessing breast positioning criteria for mammograms from standard digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Methods Assessment of breast positioning was performed by AI and by four radiographers in pairs of two on 156 examinations of women screened in Bergen, April to September 2019, as part of BreastScreen Norway. Ten criteria were used; three for craniocaudal and seven for mediolateral-oblique view. The criteria evaluated the appearance of the nipple, breast rotation, pectoral muscle, inframammary fold and pectoral nipple line. Intraclass correlation and Cohen's kappa coefficient (kappa) were used to investigate the correlation and agreement between the radiographer's assessments and AI. Results The intraclass correlation for the pectoral nipple line between the radiographers and AI was >0.92. A substantial to almost perfect agreement (kappa > 0.69) was observed between the radiographers and AI on the nipple in profile criterion. We observed a slight to moderate agreement for the other criteria (kappa = 0.06-0.52) and generally a higher agreement between the two pairs of radiographers (mean kappa = 0.70) than between the radiographers and AI (mean kappa = 0.41). Conclusions AI has great potential in evaluating breast position criteria in mammography by reducing subjectivity. However, varying agreement between radiographers and AI was observed. Standardized and evidence-based criteria for definitions, understandings and assessment methods are needed to reach optimal image quality in mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 455
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mammographic positioning quality of newly trained versus experienced radiographers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme
    van Landsveld-Verhoeven, Cary
    den Heeten, Gerard J.
    Timmers, Janine
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (11) : 3322 - 3327
  • [2] Mammographic positioning quality of newly trained versus experienced radiographers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme
    Cary van Landsveld-Verhoeven
    Gerard J. den Heeten
    Janine Timmers
    Mireille J. M. Broeders
    European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 3322 - 3327
  • [3] Automated bone age assessment in a German pediatric cohort: agreement between an artificial intelligence software and the manual Greulich and Pyle method
    Graefe, Daniel
    Beeskow, Anne Bettina
    Pfaeffle, Roland
    Rosolowski, Maciej
    Chung, Tek Sin
    Difranco, Matthew David
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (07) : 4407 - 4413
  • [4] Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Screening: Tradeoffs between Sensitivity and Specificity
    Bahl, Manisha
    Do, Synho
    RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 6 (03)
  • [5] Radiographers' agreement on mammography image quality parameters: experience of a Canadian breast screening program
    Abdolell, Mohamed
    Schofield, Stephanie
    Duggan, Ryan
    Tsuruda, Kaitlyn
    Brown, Peter
    Caines, Judy
    Iles, Sian
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 20
  • [6] Artificial intelligence in mammographic phenotyping of breast cancer risk: a narrative review
    Aimilia Gastounioti
    Shyam Desai
    Vinayak S. Ahluwalia
    Emily F. Conant
    Despina Kontos
    Breast Cancer Research, 24
  • [7] Assessment of the Willingness of Radiologists and Radiographers to Accept the Integration of Artificial Intelligence Into Radiology Practice
    Abuzaid, Mohamed M.
    Elshami, Wiam
    Tekin, Huseyin
    Issa, Bashar
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (01) : 87 - 94
  • [8] Using automated software evaluation to improve the performance of breast radiographers in tomosynthesis screening
    Gennaro, Gisella
    Povolo, Letizia
    Del Genio, Sara
    Ciampani, Lina
    Fasoli, Chiara
    Carlevaris, Paolo
    Petrioli, Maria
    Masiero, Tiziana
    Maggetto, Federico
    Caumo, Francesca
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (07) : 4738 - 4749
  • [9] Artificial intelligence in mammographic phenotyping of breast cancer risk: a narrative review
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    Desai, Shyam
    Ahluwalia, Vinayak S.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Kontos, Despina
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [10] Artificial intelligence software in pulmonary nodule assessment
    Smith, Dugal
    Melville, Phillip
    Fozzard, Nicolette
    Zhang, Jason
    Deonarine, Patricia
    Nirthanan, Selvanayagam
    Sivakumaran, Pathmanathan
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF EDINBURGH, 2022, 52 (03): : 228 - 231