Economic optimization of pork production-marketing chains .1. Model input on animal welfare and costs

被引:25
|
作者
DenOuden, M
Nijsing, JT
Dijkhuizen, AA
Huirne, RBM
机构
[1] Department of Farm Management, Wageningen Agricultural University, 6706 KN Wageningen
来源
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE | 1997年 / 48卷 / 01期
关键词
animal welfare; conjoint analysis; economic pork chain model; swine;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-6226(96)01411-X
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In recent years animal welfare has become a major concern for consumers. In developing product differentiation policies to respond to this type of concerns, animal welfare preferences have to be related to the cost of production. This paper reports on an application of conjoint analysis to evaluate pig welfare perceptions of both consumer-related respondents and pig welfare experts. Economics of the pig welfare concerns was evaluated, using an economic pork chain simulation model, including the farrowing, fattening and slaughtering stages and the transportation of pigs between these stages. Results showed that the farm stages farrowing and fattening were considered most important with respect to pig welfare. Important pig welfare attributes included group housing of non-lactating sows, supply of straw and stock density. Respondents were rather heterogenous with respect to their individual quantifications, but no significant difference in response could be found between experts and consumer-related respondents. In total, pig production and distribution costs were increased by 22 to 32% when all pig welfare attributes were included in the pork production-marketing chain. Further research is proposed to balance animal welfare and economic aspects in an integrated manner. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 37
页数:15
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare in China: Optimization of Pork Production-Marketing Chains
    Liang, Yaoming
    Cheng, Yu
    Xu, Yanjie
    Hua, Gengrong
    Zheng, Zijian
    Li, Hui
    Han, Li
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (21):
  • [2] Economic optimization of pork production-marketing chains .2. Modelling outcome
    DenOuden, M
    Huirne, RBM
    Dijkhuizen, AA
    VanBeek, P
    [J]. LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1997, 48 (01): : 39 - 50
  • [3] Coherence of animal health, welfare and carcass quality in pork production chains
    Klauke, Thorsten N.
    Pineiro, Matilde
    Schulze-Geisthoevel, Sophia
    Plattes, Susanne
    Selhorst, Thomas
    Petersen, Brigitte
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2013, 95 (03) : 704 - 711
  • [4] The costs of production in systems which differ in their perceived effects on animal welfare .1. Eggs and broilers
    Hill, J
    Asby, C
    Sturgess, I
    [J]. OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 1997, 26 (03) : 165 - 171
  • [5] MONITORING AN INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL FOR PRODUCTION .1. THE CONTROL CHARTS
    JENSEN, DR
    HUI, YV
    GHARE, PM
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (10) : 1197 - 1206
  • [6] SIMULATION OF GENETIC CHANGES IN LIFE-CYCLE EFFICIENCY OF PORK PRODUCTION .1. A BIOECONOMIC MODEL
    TESS, MW
    BENNETT, GL
    DICKERSON, GE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1983, 56 (02) : 336 - 353
  • [7] A BIO-ECONOMIC SIMULATION-MODEL FOR PRODUCTION PLANNING AND CONTROL IN GREENHOUSE PRODUCTION .1. CONCEPTION OF THE BASIC MODEL
    BOGEMANN, B
    [J]. GARTENBAUWISSENSCHAFT, 1984, 49 (04): : 145 - 148
  • [8] Developing breeding objectives for beef cattle production - 1. A bio-economic simulation model
    Hirooka, H
    Groen, AF
    Hillers, J
    [J]. ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1998, 66 : 607 - 621
  • [9] OPTIMIZATION OF ALPHA-GALACTOSIDASE PRODUCTION BY MOLD .1. GALACTOSIDASE PRODUCTION IN BATCH AND CONTINUOUS CULTURE AND A KINETIC MODEL FOR ENZYME FE PRODUCTION
    IMANAKA, T
    KAIEDA, T
    TAGUCHI, H
    SATO, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FERMENTATION TECHNOLOGY, 1972, 50 (09): : 633 - &
  • [10] MODELING, VALUATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF THE ENGINEERING OF ELECTROCHEMICAL SODIUM-CHLORATE PRODUCTION .1. INTRODUCTION AND COST MODEL FOR VALUATION OF PRODUCTION VARIANTS
    NEUMANN, HP
    KARDOS, J
    [J]. CHEMISCHE TECHNIK, 1987, 39 (05): : 205 - 208