Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs warfarin in people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes: an administrative claims database analysis

被引:24
|
作者
Coleman, C. I. [1 ,2 ]
Bunz, T. J. [3 ]
Eriksson, D. [4 ]
Meinecke, A. -K. [4 ]
Sood, N. A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Sch Pharm, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Hartford Hosp, Hartford, CT 06115 USA
[3] New England Hlth Analyt LLC, Granby, CT USA
[4] Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
[5] Southcoast Hlth Syst, Dept Cardiac Electrophysiol, Fall River, MA USA
关键词
RISK; STROKE;
D O I
10.1111/dme.13648
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AimTo assess the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs warfarin in people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes treated in routine practice. MethodsUsing US MarketScan claims data for the period November 2011 to December 2016, we identified oral anticoagulation-naive people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes (Type 1 or Type 2) and 12 months of continuous insurance coverage prior to the qualifying oral anticoagulation dispensing time. Rivaroxaban users were 1:1 propensity score-matched to warfarin users. Participants were followed until an event, oral anticoagulation switch/discontinuation, insurance disenrolment or end of follow-up. Rates (events/100 person-years) of the composite of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were compared using Cox regression and reported as hazard ratios and 95% CIs. ResultsWe assessed 5517 rivaroxaban users (20% received the reduced dose) and 5517 warfarin users with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes (similar to 97% with Type 2 diabetes) with a median (interquartile range) available follow-up of 1.5 (0.7, 2.7) years. Rivaroxaban was associated with nonsignificant reductions in stroke or systemic embolism (0.87 vs 1.35/100 person-years; hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.44-1.05) and ischaemic stroke (0.69 vs 0.93/100 person-years; hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.48-1.30) compared with warfarin. No differences in major bleeding (2.7 vs 3.0/100 person-years; hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.74-1.25) were observed. Similar results were seen when analysis was limited to standard-dose rivaroxaban. Reduced-dose rivaroxaban was associated with a significantly decreased hazard of stroke or systemic embolism and ischaemic stroke, without an increase in major bleeding risk. ConclusionsRivaroxaban has effectiveness and safety at least as good as those of warfarin in people with diabetes and non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated in routine clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1105 / 1110
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative effectiveness and safety of warfarin and dabigatran in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Japan: A claims database analysis
    Koretsune, Yukihiro
    Yamashita, Takeshi
    Yasaka, Masahiro
    Ono, Yasuhisa
    Hirakawa, Takeshi
    Ishida, Kosuke
    Kuroki, Daisuke
    Sumida, Toshiyuki
    Urushihara, Hisashi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (3-4) : 204 - 209
  • [2] Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and heart failure
    Martinez, Brandon K.
    Bunz, Thomas J.
    Eriksson, Daniel
    Meinecke, Anna-Katharina
    Sood, Nitesh A.
    Coleman, Craig I.
    [J]. ESC HEART FAILURE, 2019, 6 (01): : 10 - 15
  • [3] Rivaroxaban vs. warfarin and renal outcomes in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with diabetes
    Hernandez, Adrian, V
    Bradley, George
    Khan, Mohammad
    Fratoni, Andrew
    Gasparini, Anna
    Roman, Yuani M.
    Bunz, Thomas J.
    Eriksson, Daniel
    Meinecke, Anna-Katharina
    Coleman, Craig, I
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2020, 6 (04) : 301 - 307
  • [4] Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in patients 80+ years of age with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
    Coleman, Craig I.
    Weeda, Erin R.
    Elaine Nguyen
    Bunz, Thomas J.
    Sood, Nitesh A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2018, 4 (04) : 328 - 329
  • [5] Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and coronary or peripheral artery disease
    Coleman, Craig, I
    Baker, William L.
    Meinecke, Anna-Katharina
    Eriksson, Daniel
    Martinez, Brandon K.
    Bunz, Thomas J.
    Alberts, Mark J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2020, 6 (03) : 159 - 166
  • [6] Comparative Effectiveness of Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
    Bengtson, Lindsay
    Chen, Lin
    MacLehose, Richard
    Lutsey, Pamela
    Alonso, Alvaro
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2014, 130
  • [7] Comparative effectiveness of dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation
    Bengtson, Lindsay G. S.
    Lutsey, Pamela L.
    Chen, Lin Y.
    MacLehose, Richard F.
    Alonso, Alvaro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (5-6) : 868 - 876
  • [8] Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Costs of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin Among Morbidly Obese Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Ashton, Veronica
    Chen, Yen-Wen
    Wu, Bingcao
    Mangla, Kamal Kant
    Spyropoulos, Alex C.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2018, 138
  • [9] Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin or dabigatran for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
    Norby, Faye L.
    Bengtson, Lindsay G. S.
    Lutsey, Pamela L.
    Chen, Lin Y.
    MacLehose, Richard F.
    Chamberlain, Alanna M.
    Rapson, Ian
    Alonso, Alvaro
    [J]. BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2017, 17
  • [10] Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin or dabigatran for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
    Faye L. Norby
    Lindsay G.S. Bengtson
    Pamela L. Lutsey
    Lin Y. Chen
    Richard F. MacLehose
    Alanna M. Chamberlain
    Ian Rapson
    Alvaro Alonso
    [J]. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 17