Characterization and Validation of the Second-generation wPUM Topography Monitors

被引:2
|
作者
Robinson, Risa J. [1 ]
Jayasekera, Shehan [1 ]
DiFrancesco, Gary [1 ]
Hensel, Edward C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rochester Inst Technol, Kate Gleason Coll Engn, 1 Lomb Mem Dr, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
关键词
MEASUREMENT DEVICE; NICOTINE DELIVERY; PLASMA NICOTINE; HEART-RATE; USERS; SMOKING; ENVIRONMENT; DEPOSITION;
D O I
10.1093/ntr/ntaa153
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Little is known about the natural use behavior of new and emerging tobacco products due to the limited availability of reliable puff topography monitors suitable for ambulatory deployment. An understanding of use behavior is needed to assess the health impact of emerging tobacco products and inform realistic standardized topography profiles for emissions studies. The purpose of this study is to validate four monitors: the wPUM cigalike, vapepen, hookah, and cigarette monitors. Aims and Methods: Each wPUM monitor was characterized and validated for range, accuracy, and resolution for puff flow rate, duration, volume, and interpuff gap in a controlled laboratory environment. Monitor repeatability was assessed for each wPUM monitor using four separate week-long natural environment monitoring studies including cigalike, vapepen, hookah, and cigarette users. Results: The valid flow rate range was 10 to 100 mL/s for cigalike and cigarette monitors, 10 to 95 mL/s for vapepen monitors, and 50 to 400 mL/s hookah monitors. Flow rate accuracy was within +/- 2 mL/s for cigalike, vapepen, and cigarette monitors and +/- 6 mL/s for the hookah monitor. Durations and interpuff gaps as small as 0.2 s were measured to within +/- 0.07 s. Monitor calibrations changed by 4.7% (vapepen), 1.5% (cigarette), 0.5% (cigalike), and 0.1% (hookah) after 1 week of natural environment use. Conclusions: The wPUM topography monitors were demonstrated to be reliable when deployed in the natural environment for a range of emerging tobacco products.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 396
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identification and characterization of second-generation antisense oligonucleotides
    Dean, NM
    Griffey, RH
    [J]. ANTISENSE & NUCLEIC ACID DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 7 (03): : 229 - 233
  • [2] Validation of the second-generation Olympus colonoscopy simulator for skills assessment
    Haycock, A. V.
    Bassett, P.
    Bladen, J.
    Thomas-Gibson, S.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 41 (11) : 952 - 958
  • [3] Second-generation kernel for characterization of carbonaceous material by adsorption
    Lucena, Sebastiao M. P.
    Oliveira, Jose C. A.
    Goncalves, Daniel V.
    Silvino, Pedro F. G.
    [J]. CARBON, 2017, 119 : 378 - 385
  • [4] Synthesis and characterization of second-generation dialkylphenacylsulfonium salt photoinitiators
    Crivello, JV
    Kong, SQ
    [J]. MACROMOLECULES, 2000, 33 (03) : 825 - 832
  • [5] The second-generation biofuels
    Jeczmionek, Lukasz
    Oleksiak, Stanislaw
    Skret, Iwona
    Marchut, Antoni
    [J]. PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2006, 85 (12): : 1570 - 1574
  • [6] Second-generation biopharmaceuticals
    Walsh, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 2004, 58 (02) : 185 - 196
  • [7] Second-Generation Textualism
    Manning, John F.
    [J]. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2010, 98 (04) : 1287 - 1318
  • [8] Second-generation Cubans
    Hill, KA
    Moreno, D
    [J]. HISPANIC JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 1996, 18 (02) : 175 - 193
  • [9] Second-generation microstimulator
    Arcos, I
    Davis, R
    Fey, K
    Mishler, D
    Sanderson, D
    Tanacs, C
    Vogel, MJ
    Wolf, R
    Zilberman, Y
    Schulman, J
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2002, 26 (03) : 228 - 231
  • [10] Second-generation models
    Alan Packer
    [J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2004, 5 : 888 - 888