Flux of aquatic insect productivity to land: comparison of lentic and lotic ecosystems

被引:144
|
作者
Gratton, Claudio [1 ]
Vander Zanden, M. Jake [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Entomol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Limnol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
allochthonous resources; emerging aquatic insects; food webs; insect dispersal; lake-land linkages; landscape ecology; spatial subsidies; FOOD WEBS; TERRESTRIAL PREY; STREAM; EMERGENCE; LAKE; LINKAGES; PATTERNS; NITROGEN; RIVER; ZOOBENTHOS;
D O I
10.1890/08-1546.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Recently, food web studies have started exploring how resources from one habitat or ecosystem influence trophic interactions in a recipient ecosystem. Benthic production in lakes and streams can be exported to terrestrial habitats via emerging aquatic insects and can therefore link aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. In this study, we develop a general conceptual model that highlights zoobenthic production, insect emergence, and ecosystem geometry (driven principally by area-to-edge ratio) as important factors modulating the flux of aquatic production across the ecosystem boundary. Emerging insect flux, defined as total insect production emerging per meter of shoreline (g C.m(-1).yr(-1)) is then distributed inland using decay functions and is used to estimate insect deposition rate to terrestrial habitats (g C.m(-2).yr(-1)). Using empirical data from the literature, we simulate insect fluxes across the water-land ecosystem boundary to estimate the distribution of fluxes and insect deposition inland for lakes and streams. In general, zoobenthos in streams are more productive than in lakes (6.67 vs. 1.46 g C.m(-2).yr(-1)) but have lower insect emergence to aquatic production ratios (0.19 vs. 0.30). However, as stream width is on average smaller than lake radius, this results in flux (F) estimates 21/2 times greater for lakes than for streams. Ultimately, insect deposition onto land (within 100 m of shore) adjacent to average-sized lakes (10-ha lakes, 0.021 g C.m(-2).yr(-1)) is greater than for average-sized streams (4m width, 0.002 g C.m(-2).yr(-1)) used in our comparisons. For the average lake (both in size and productivity), insect deposition rate approaches estimates of terrestrial secondary production in low-productivity ecosystems (e. g., deserts and tundra, approximate to 0.07 g C.m(-2).yr(-1)). However, larger lakes (1300 ha) and streams (16 m) can have average insect deposition rates (approximate to 0.01-2.4 g C.m(-2).yr(-1)) comparable to estimates of secondary production of more productive ecosystems such as grasslands. Because of the potentially large inputs of emerging aquatic insects into terrestrial habitats, ecosystem processes and terrestrial consumers can be influenced by insect inputs. The relative contribution of lakes and streams to this flux will vary among landscapes depending on the number and size of these ecosystems types on the landscape.
引用
收藏
页码:2689 / 2699
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Limnochemical Characterization of Lotic and Lentic Ecosystems in Agbede Wetlands
    Dirisu, Abdul-Rahman
    Olomukoro, John Ovie
    Imoobe, Tunde Ohiokhioya Thadeus
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2018, 18 (04) : 585 - 595
  • [2] Selenium accumulation patterns in lotic and lentic aquatic systems
    Hillwalker, Wendy E.
    Jepson, Paul C.
    Anderson, Kim A.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 366 (01) : 367 - 379
  • [3] VARIATION IN PHYTOPLANKTONIC PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY IN LENTIC AND LOTIC SYSTEM
    SAHA, LC
    PANDIT, B
    [J]. NATIONAL ACADEMY SCIENCE LETTERS-INDIA, 1985, 8 (10): : 305 - 306
  • [4] A comprehensive review of water quality indices for lotic and lentic ecosystems
    Mogane, Lazarus Katlego
    Masebe, Tracy
    Msagati, Titus A. M.
    Ncube, Esper
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2023, 195 (08)
  • [5] The use of environmental DNA for biodiversity monitoring in lentic and lotic ecosystems
    James, Joanna
    Moore, Emily M.
    Naden, Rachel
    Aston, Ben
    Bradbeer, Stephanie J.
    Stebbing, Paul D.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND EVIDENCE, 2024, 5 (03):
  • [6] Trichomycetes from lentic and lotic aquatic habitats in Ontario, Canada
    Strongman, D. B.
    White, Merlin M.
    [J]. BOTANY, 2008, 86 (12) : 1449 - 1466
  • [7] Aquatic macrophytes of lentic and lotic water bodies of Balrampur - India
    Mishra, Anup Kumar
    Srivastava, Anupma
    Tewari, D. D.
    [J]. VEGETOS, 2007, 20 (01): : 19 - 27
  • [8] A comprehensive review of water quality indices for lotic and lentic ecosystems
    Lazarus Katlego Mogane
    Tracy Masebe
    Titus A. M. Msagati
    Esper Ncube
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2023, 195
  • [9] Comparative Analysis of Fish Distribution in Lentic and Lotic Ecosystems (Review)
    A. D. Mochek
    D. S. Pavlov
    [J]. Inland Water Biology, 2021, 14 : 196 - 204
  • [10] Comparative Analysis of Fish Distribution in Lentic and Lotic Ecosystems (Review)
    Mochek, A. D.
    Pavlov, D. S.
    [J]. INLAND WATER BIOLOGY, 2021, 14 (02) : 196 - 204