Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Vietnam

被引:47
|
作者
Le, Tuyet-Anh T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vodden, Kelly [1 ,3 ]
Wu, Jianghua [1 ]
Atiwesh, Ghada [4 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Sch Sci & Environm, Grenfell Campus, Corner Brook, NF A2H 5G4, Canada
[2] Vietnamese Acad Forest Sci, Forestry Econ Res Ctr, 46 Duc Thang Ward, Hanoi 11910, Vietnam
[3] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Environm Policy Inst, Grenfell Campus, Corner Brook, NF A2H 5G4, Canada
[4] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Environm Sci, St Johns Campus, St John, NF A1C 5S7, Canada
关键词
coronavirus; COVID-19 in Vietnam; pandemic in Vietnam; policy documents; policy tools; policy responses; policy measures; Vietnam;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18020559
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic has become one of the most serious health crises in human history, spreading rapidly across the globe from January 2020 to the present. With prompt and drastic measures, Vietnam is one of the few countries that has largely succeeded in controlling the outbreak. This result is derived from a harmonious combination of many factors, with the policy system playing a key role. This study assessed the policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam from the early days of the outbreak in January 2020 to 24 July 2020 (with a total of 413 cases confirmed and 99 days of no new cases infected from the local community) by synthesizing and evaluating 959 relevant policy documents in different classifications. The findings show that the Vietnamese policy system responded promptly, proactively, and effectively at multiple authority levels (33 different agencies from the national to provincial governments), using a range of policy tools and measures. Parallel to the daily occurrence of 2.24 new cases, 5.13 new policy documents were issued on average per day over the study period. The pandemic policy response over the first six months in Vietnam were divided into four periods, I (23 January-5 March), II (6-19 March), III (20 March-21 April), and IV (22 April-24 July). This paper synthesizes eight solution groups for these four anti-pandemic phases, including outbreak announcements and steering documents, medical measures, blockade of the schools, emergency responses, border and entry control measures, social isolation and nationwide social isolation measures, financial supports, and other measures. By emphasizing diversification of the policy responses, from the agencies to the tools and measures, the case study reviews and shares lessons from the successful COVID-19 prevention and control in Vietnam that could be useful for other nations.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 35
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spread of COVID-19 and policy responses in Vietnam: An overview
    Van Nguyen, Quang
    Cao, Dung Anh
    Nghiem, Son Hong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 103 : 157 - 161
  • [2] ASEAN Policy Responses to COVID-19 Pandemic: Adaptation and Experimentation Policy: A Study of ASEAN Countries Policy Volatility for COVID-19 Pandemic
    Purnomo, Eko Priyo
    Agustiyara
    Nurmandi, Achmad
    Dewi, Arlina
    Rosa, Elsye Maria
    Bayu, Agung Huda
    Erviana, Rima
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [3] The impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, policy responses and macroeconomic fundamentals on market risks across sectors in Vietnam
    Hung Quang Bui
    Thao Tran
    Hung Le-Phuc Nguyen
    Duc Hong Vo
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (08):
  • [4] Global policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: proportionate adaptation and policy experimentation: a study of country policy response variation to the COVID-19 pandemic
    Dewi, Arlina
    Nurmandi, Achmad
    Rochmawati, Erna
    Purnomo, Eko Priyo
    Rizqi, Muhammad Dimas
    Azzahra, Abitassha
    Benedictos, Samantha
    Suardi, Wandania
    Dewi, Dyah Tri Kusuma
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 10 (04): : 359 - 365
  • [5] Pandemic politics: policy evaluations of government responses to COVID-19
    Altiparmakis, Argyrios
    Bojar, Abel
    Brouard, Sylvain
    Foucault, Martial
    Kriesi, Hanspeter
    Nadeau, Richard
    [J]. WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2021, 44 (5-6) : 1159 - 1179
  • [6] Federal Institutions and Strategic Policy Responses to COVID-19 Pandemic
    Shvetsova, Olga
    VanDusky-Allen, Julie
    Zhirnov, Andrei
    Adeel, Abdul Basit
    Catalano, Michael
    Catalano, Olivia
    Giannelli, Frank
    Muftuoglu, Ezgi
    Rosenberg, Dina
    Sezgin, Mehmet Halit
    Zhao, Tianyi
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 3
  • [7] Social Media and Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Switzerland
    Gilardi, Fabrizio
    Gessler, Theresa
    Kubli, Mael
    Mueller, Stefan
    [J]. SWISS POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2021, 27 (02) : 243 - 256
  • [8] The COVID-19 pandemic: shocks to human capital and policy responses
    Deng, Guichuan
    Shi, Jing
    Li, Yanli
    Liao, Yin
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2021, 61 (04): : 5613 - 5630
  • [9] Mobility and Policy Responses During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020
    Cepaluni, Gabriel
    Dorsch, Michael T.
    Kovarek, Daniel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 67
  • [10] Social policy in the face of a global pandemic: Policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis
    Beland, Daniel
    Cantillon, Bea
    Hick, Rod
    Moreira, Amilcar
    [J]. SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2021, 55 (02) : 249 - 260