Accreditation and continuous quality improvement in athletic training education

被引:0
|
作者
Peer, KS [1 ]
Rakich, JS
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Sch Exercise Leisure & Sport, Kent, OH 44242 USA
[2] Indiana Univ SE, New Albany, IN 47150 USA
关键词
process improvement; Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP); Joint Review Committee on Educational Programs in Athletic Training (JRC-AT); leadership;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Objective: To apply the continuous quality improvement model commonly associated with the business sector to entry-level athletic training education program accreditation. Data Sources: We applied athletic training educational program accreditation as a tool for ensuring quality in the entry-level athletic training education programs accredited by the Commission on the Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs. Literature from the business, education, and athletic training fields is integrated to support this paradigm shift in athletic training education. Data Synthesis: The advent of mandated entry-level athletic training educational program accreditation has forced institutions to evaluate their educational programs. Accreditation will promote continuous quality improvement in athletic training education through mechanisms such as control measures and process improvement. Conclusions/Recommendations: Although accreditation of entry-level athletic training education programs has created some dissonance among athletic training professionals, it will strengthen the profession as a whole. Athletic training educators must capture the synergy generated from this change to ensure quality educational experiences for all our students as we move forward to secure a strong position in the allied health care market.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 193
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of continuous quality improvement in accreditation for medical education
    Nesibe Akdemir
    Linda N. Peterson
    Craig M. Campbell
    Fedde Scheele
    [J]. BMC Medical Education, 20
  • [2] Evaluation of continuous quality improvement in accreditation for medical education
    Akdemir, Nesibe
    Peterson, Linda N.
    Campbell, Craig M.
    Scheele, Fedde
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (Suppl 1)
  • [3] Continuous quality improvement in an accreditation system for undergraduate medical education: Benefits and challenges
    Barzansky, Barbara
    Hunt, Dan
    Moineau, Genevieve
    Ahn, Ducksun
    Lai, Chi-Wan
    Humphrey, Holly
    Peterson, Linda
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2015, 37 (11) : 1032 - 1038
  • [4] ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
    Vaca Auz, Janet
    Almuinas Rivero, Jose Luis
    Galarza Lopez, Judith
    [J]. REVISTA SAN GREGORIO, 2018, (22): : 6 - 12
  • [5] Perceptions of quality for graduate athletic training education
    Seegmiller, Jeff G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2006, 41 (04) : 415 - 421
  • [6] Training for continuous quality improvement
    Jaehn, AH
    [J]. TAPPI JOURNAL, 1996, 79 (07): : 101 - 102
  • [7] Accreditation of Medical Education Programs: Moving From Student Outcomes to Continuous Quality Improvement Measures
    Blouin, Danielle
    Tekian, Ara
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 93 (03) : 377 - 383
  • [8] Putting continuous quality improvement into accreditation: improving approaches to quality assessment
    Scrivens, E
    [J]. QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1997, 6 (04): : 212 - 218
  • [9] The Italian way: Accreditation and continuous quality improvement in clinical laboratories
    Plebani, M
    [J]. ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 1999, 4 (03) : 84 - 86
  • [10] The Italian way: Accreditation and continuous quality improvement in clinical laboratories
    M. Plebani
    [J]. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 1999, 4 : 84 - 86