Evaluating Alignment Between Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction

被引:117
|
作者
Martone, Andrea [1 ]
Sireci, Stephen G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Coll St Rose, Albany, NY 12203 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Ctr Educ Assessment, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
assessment; test theory and development; test validity and reliability; teacher education and development; psychometrics; CONTENT VALIDITY; STANDARDS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.3102/0034654309341375
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The authors (a) discuss the importance of alignment for facilitating proper assessment and instruction, (b) describe the three most common methods for evaluating the alignment between state content standards and assessments, (c) discuss the relative strengths and limitations of these methods, and (d) discuss examples of applications of each method. They conclude that choice of alignment method depends on the specific goals of a state or district and that alignment research is critical for ensuring the standards-assessment-instruction cycle facilitates student learning. Additional potential benefits of alignment research include valuable professional development for teachers and better understanding of the results from standardized assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:1332 / 1361
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条