Regulating assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Nigeria: lessons from Australia and the United Kingdom

被引:1
|
作者
Ekechi-Agwu, Chinelo A. [1 ]
Nwafor, Anthony O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
[2] Univ Venda, Sch Law, Thohoyandou, South Africa
来源
关键词
Assisted reproduction; law; ethics; Nigeria; Australia; United Kingdom;
D O I
10.29063/ajrh2020/v24i4.9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART), are innovative, non-coital medical procreative procedures, that have brought respite to a number of childless persons and couples, just as it also raises a number of ethical and medico-legal issues. A number of countries including Nigeria, are still struggling to find the appropriate legal framework to provide guidelines for this reproductive process to curtail inherent unethical practices associated with that development. The paper explores the available regulatory instruments in Nigeria and in cognate jurisdictions such as Australia and the United Kingdom, through a comparative study to ascertain the efficacy of the existing instruments in ensuring that unethical practices and abuses associated with ART are eradicated. The findings indicate that the regulatory instrument in Nigeria requires significant improvement in line with the legal frameworks in operation in the cognate jurisdictions to effectively guard against potential unethical practices and abuses associated with the application of ART.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 93
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multigestation as a marker of reproductive efficacy. Lessons from assisted reproductive technologies (ART)
    Zegers-Hochschild, F.
    Quispe, J.
    Sepulveda, M. S.
    Bravo, M.
    Fernandez, E.
    Fabres, C.
    Balmaceda, J.
    Mackenna, A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 : 1 - 2
  • [2] State of the ART: Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the United States
    Hornstein, Mark D.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2016, 23 (12) : 1630 - 1633
  • [3] State of the ART: Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the United States
    Mark D. Hornstein
    [J]. Reproductive Sciences, 2016, 23 : 1630 - 1633
  • [4] Lessons across the pond: Assisted reproductive technology in the United Kingdom and the United States
    Ouellette, A
    Caplan, A
    Carroll, K
    Fossett, JW
    Bjarnadottir, D
    Shickle, D
    McGee, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE, 2005, 31 (04) : 419 - 446
  • [5] COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON THE REGULATION OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND CANADA
    Nelson, Erin L.
    [J]. ALBERTA LAW REVIEW, 2006, 43 (04) : 1023 - 1048
  • [6] SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAWS IN NIGERIA: LESSONS FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM
    Okongwu, Onyeka C.
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW, 2024, 32 (03) : 400 - 420
  • [7] Regulating Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Japan
    Naoki Takeshita
    Kanako Hanaoka
    Yukihiro Shibui
    Hikoyoshi Jinnai
    Yuji Abe
    Harumi Kubo
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2003, 20 : 260 - 264
  • [8] Regulating assisted reproductive technologies in Japan
    Takeshita, N
    Hanaoka, K
    Shibui, Y
    Jinnai, H
    Abe, Y
    Kubo, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 20 (07) : 260 - 264
  • [9] An Opinion on Regulating the Assisted Reproductive Technologies
    Don P. Wolf
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2003, 20 : 290 - 292
  • [10] An opinion on regulating the assisted reproductive technologies
    Wolf, DP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 20 (07) : 290 - 292