The sense of agency in human-human vs human-robot joint action

被引:26
|
作者
Grynszpan, Ouriel [1 ,4 ]
Sahai, Aisha [2 ]
Hamidi, Nasmeh [1 ]
Pacherie, Elisabeth [3 ]
Berberian, Bruno [2 ]
Roche, Lucas [1 ]
Saint-Bauzel, Ludovic [1 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, ISIR, Paris, France
[2] Off Natl Etud & Rech Aerosp, French Aerosp Lab, Dept Traitement Informat & Syst, Salon De Provence, France
[3] PSL Res Univ, Inst Jean Nicod, Dept Etud Cognit, EHESS,ENS,CNRS, Paris, France
[4] Univ Paris Sud, CNRS, LIMSI, Orsay, France
关键词
Sense of agency; Joint action; Kinesthesis; Haptic; Robotics;
D O I
10.1016/j.concog.2019.102820
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Kinesthesis pertains to the perception of moving body parts, while the sense of agency refers to the experience of controlling one's action-effects. Based on previous work, we hypothesized that the sense of agency would decrease in joint action with a robot compared to a human partner. Pairs of participants were jointly manipulating two interconnected haptic devices enabling them to feel each other's forces. Unbeknown to participants, their partner was sometimes replaced by a robot. The sense of agency was assessed using intentional binding, which refers to a contraction of perceived time between an action and its effect for intentional actions, and participants' judgment of their contribution to joint action. Participants judged their contribution as higher when they were initiating action and when they were paired with the robot. By contrast, intentional binding occurred only with a human partner. This outcome supports the hypothesis that human-robot joint action hinders intentional binding.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interacting in time and space: Investigating human-human and human-robot joint action
    Glasauer, S.
    Huber, M.
    Basili, P.
    Knoll, A.
    Brandt, T.
    2010 IEEE RO-MAN, 2010, : 252 - 257
  • [2] Human-Human vs. Human-Robot Teamed Investigation
    Harriott, Caroline E.
    Buford, Glenna L.
    Zhang, Tao
    Adams, Julie A.
    HRI'12: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH ANNUAL ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2012, : 405 - 405
  • [3] Action Alignment from Gaze Cues in Human-Human and Human-Robot Interaction
    Duarte, Nuno Ferreira
    Rakovic, Mirko
    Marques, Jorge
    Santos-Victor, Jose
    COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2018 WORKSHOPS, PT III, 2019, 11131 : 197 - 212
  • [4] Reduced Sense of Agency in Human-Robot Interaction
    Ciardo, Francesca
    De Tommaso, Davide
    Beyer, Frederike
    Wykowska, Agnieszka
    SOCIAL ROBOTICS, ICSR 2018, 2018, 11357 : 441 - 450
  • [5] Physical Collaboration of Human-Human and Human-Robot Teams
    Reed, Kyle B.
    Peshkin, Michael A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS, 2008, 1 (02) : 108 - 120
  • [6] Movement coordination in applied human-human and human-robot interaction
    Schuboe, Anna
    Vesper, Cordula
    Wiesbeck, Mathey
    Stork, Sonja
    HCI AND USABILITY FOR MEDICINE AND HEALTH CARE, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4799 : 143 - +
  • [7] Linguistic and neurophysiological comparison of human-human and human-robot conversations
    Hallart, Charlie
    Maes, Juliette
    Spatola, Nicolas
    Prevot, Laurent
    Chaminade, Thierry
    TRAITEMENT AUTOMATIQUE DES LANGUES, 2020, 61 (03): : 69 - 93
  • [8] Differential biases in human-human versus human-robot interactions
    Alarcon, Gene M.
    Capiola, August
    Hamdan, Izz Aldin
    Lee, Michael A.
    Jessup, Sarah A.
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2023, 106
  • [9] Motor Contagion during Human-Human and Human-Robot Interaction
    Bisio, Ambra
    Sciutti, Alessandra
    Nori, Francesco
    Metta, Giorgio
    Fadiga, Luciano
    Sandini, Giulio
    Pozzo, Thierry
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (08):
  • [10] Theory of Mind Assessment with Human-Human and Human-Robot Interactions
    Rabe, Trent
    Callis, Anisa
    Zheng, Zhi
    Heard, Jamison
    Bailey, Reynold
    Alm, Cecilia
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION: TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION, PT II, 2022, 13303 : 564 - 579