Effect of CAD/CAM Post Process on S-Shaped Machining Test for Five-Axis Machining Center

被引:5
|
作者
Ihara, Yukitoshi [1 ]
Takubo, Koichiro [2 ]
Nakai, Tatsuo [3 ]
Sato, Ryuta [4 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Inst Technol, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Asahi Ku, 5-16-1 Omiya, Osaka 5358585, Japan
[2] Osaka Inst Technol, Grad Sch Engn, Asahi Ku, 5-16-1 Omiya, Osaka 5358585, Japan
[3] Yamazaki Mazak Corp, Applicat Dept, Solut Acad 3Grp, 1-131 Takeda,Oguchi Cho, Niwa, Aichi 4800197, Japan
[4] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Nada Ku, 1-1 Rokko Dai, Kobe, Hyogo 6578501, Japan
关键词
CAM; five-axis machining center; S-shaped machining test; NC program; post processor; IDENTIFICATION; COMPENSATION; ERRORS;
D O I
10.20965/ijat.2019.p0593
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
ISO 10791-7, the test standard for machining centers, was revised in 2014 to add the test method for five-axis machining centers. However, an S-shaped test was additionally proposed as an accuracy test of aircraft parts from China immediately before the establishment of the test standard. In an ISO meeting, various problems such as creating three-dimensional models and evaluation items have been indicated for the proposed test method. By revising these problems, the standard was finally completed and will be introduced as an informative annex soon. However, it is still an inappropriate test method from the viewpoint of performance inspection for machine tools. In this research, the S-shaped test method draft proposed in September 2016 is tested using two types of five-axis machining centers and commercial CAM software. Consequently, a hidden problem is revealed, that is, an abrupt movement that affected the final result is added to the machine because the rotation direction of the rotary axes is not ideal. This is attributed to the performance of the CAM software's post processor that converts from CL data to NC program. This study provides some insights into avoiding the problem and obtaining better test results.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 601
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Five-Axis Machining Center
    不详
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2009, 143 (06): : 29 - 30
  • [2] Feasibility of 8-Shaped Motion Test for Five-Axis Machining Center
    Ihara, Yukitoshi
    Kajino, Souma
    Inoue, Yuto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 17 (05) : 477 - 485
  • [3] Reliability Test Design for Five-axis Machining Center
    Zhang, Xiangpo
    Yu, Naihui
    Shang, Jianzhong
    Wang, Zhuo
    FRONTIERS OF MANUFACTURING AND DESIGN SCIENCE, PTS 1-4, 2011, 44-47 : 834 - 838
  • [4] Condition for machining feasibility for a five-axis machining center
    Wakai, Naoki
    Takasugi, Keigo
    Asakawa, Naoki
    PRECISION ENGINEERING-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETIES FOR PRECISION ENGINEERING AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 74 : 414 - 425
  • [5] Five-axis machining center design
    Lockwood, E
    CONTROL ENGINEERING, 2005, 52 (08) : IM9 - +
  • [6] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS BETWEEN ERROR MOTIONS AND MACHINED SHAPE ERRORS IN FIVE-AXIS MACHINING CENTERS: IN CASE OF S-SHAPED MACHINING TEST BY A SQUARE END MILL
    Li, Zongze
    Sato, Ryuta
    Shirase, Keiichi
    Lhara, Yukitoshi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 14TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2019, VOL 2, 2019,
  • [7] Separating machining errors of S-shaped samples based on the comprehensive error field of five-axis machine tools
    Shi Wu
    Yupeng Wang
    Xianli Liu
    Zhengdong Fan
    Tai Yu
    Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2023, 37 : 305 - 316
  • [8] Separating machining errors of S-shaped samples based on the comprehensive error field of five-axis machine tools
    Wu, Shi
    Wang, Yupeng
    Liu, Xianli
    Fan, Zhengdong
    Yu, Tai
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 37 (01) : 305 - 316
  • [9] Who's Afraid of Five-Axis Machining?
    Sinkora, E. D.
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2019, 162 (01): : 31 - 39
  • [10] Accuracy test standard for five-axis machining centers
    Ihara, Yukitoshi
    Seimitsu Kogaku Kaishi/Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, 2012, 78 (07): : 581 - 584