Introducing rewilding to restoration to expand the conservation effort: a response to Hayward et al.

被引：13
|
作者：
Anderson, Robert M. [1 ]
Buitenwerf, Robert [2 ,3 ]
Driessen, Clemens [4 ]
Genes, Luisa [5 ,6 ]
Lorimer, Jamie [7 ]
Svenning, Jens-Christian [2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Geog, Box 353550, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Aarhus Univ, Ctr Biodivers Dynam Changing World BIOCHANGE, Ny Munkegade 114, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Biosci, Sect Ecoinformat & Biodivers, Ny Munkegade 114, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[4] Wageningen Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Dept Ecol, CP 68020, BR-21941590 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[7] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
来源：
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION | 2019年 / 28卷 / 13期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1007/s10531-019-01845-1
中图分类号：
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号：
090705 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：3691 / 3693
页数：3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Introducing rewilding to restoration to expand the conservation effort: a response to Hayward et al.
    Robert M. Anderson
    Robert Buitenwerf
    Clemens Driessen
    Luísa Genes
    Jamie Lorimer
    Jens-Christian Svenning
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2019, 28 : 3691 - 3693
  • [2] In defence of 'rewilding' - a response to Hayward et al. (2019)
    Derham, Tristan T.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 236 : 583 - 583
  • [3] Video feedback: is it worth the effort? A response to Borup et al.
    Lowenthal, Patrick R.
    ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 69 (01): : 127 - 131
  • [4] Video feedback: is it worth the effort? A response to Borup et al.
    Patrick R. Lowenthal
    Educational Technology Research and Development, 2021, 69 : 127 - 131
  • [5] In response to Murphy et al., Lower et al., and Lan et al.
    Conrad, B
    CELL, 1998, 95 (01) : 16 - 16
  • [6] Focal species and restoration ecology: Response to Lindenmayer et al.
    Lambeck, RJ
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (02) : 549 - 551
  • [7] Landowner preferences and conservation prioritization: response to Nielsen et al.
    Eyvindson, Kyle
    Repo, Anna
    Burgas, Daniel
    Monkkonen, Mikko
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2017, 31 (06) : 1488 - 1490
  • [8] Response to Rowland et al. and Achour et al.
    Pridgeon, Chris S.
    Johansson, Inger
    Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 112 (06) : 1155 - 1155
  • [9] A response to "Current normative concepts in conservation" by Callicott et al.
    Willers, B
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (02) : 570 - 572
  • [10] In Response to Morgan et al. and Li et al.
    Goldberg, M.
    McGale, P.
    Whelan, T. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 115 (04): : 1012 - 1013
12345