K. N. Leontiev and I. I. Fudel: the Question of Continuity

The article investigates the relationship and views of the philosopher K. N. Leontiev and the priest J. I. Fudel, known in the historiography as his "disciple". The author argues that these relations were deep and multi-faceted, but not linear. Indeed, familiarity with Leontiev was one of the most significant events in the life of father Joseph: it brought him to the Optina Hermitage, strengthened on the Orthodox ground; with the assistance of an older friend Fudel achieved his cherished dream to get closer to the people by becoming a priest. However, the extent of Leontiev's influence on outlook of Fudel must not be overestimated. This becomes clear in the context of the life of Fudel: before Leontiev Fudel promotrd the idea of the "Orthodox Narodnichestvo" which also inspired his futher extensive pastoral and social activity. Leontiev, in contrast to Fudel, did not recognize Feodor Dostoevsky in principle, meanwhile Fudel wasn't close to "Byzantinism". Although Fudel became the first publisher of the writings of Leontiev, the main range of issues in their journalism did not match. He avoided political themes, was rather a doer, than a thinker, and appreciated Leontiev mostly for his importance in returning of intelligentsia to the Church (one of the central themes for Fudel). In that way we can speak about ideological influence but not continuity. "Discipleship" here was very specific and spiritual in its nature.