Sensitivity of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-reactive Protein in Childhood Bone and Joint Infections

被引:169
|
作者
Paakkonen, Markus [1 ,2 ]
Kallio, Markku J. T. [2 ]
Kallio, Pentti E. [2 ]
Peltola, Heikki [2 ]
机构
[1] Mikkeli Cent Hosp, Mikkeli 50100, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Hosp Children & Adolescents, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
ACUTE HEMATOGENOUS OSTEOMYELITIS; BLOOD-CELL COUNT; SEPTIC ARTHRITIS; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; LABORATORY TESTS; CHILDREN; BACTERIAL; METAANALYSIS; DISEASES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-009-0936-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In addition to the examination of clinical signs, several laboratory markers have been measured for diagnostics and monitoring of pediatric septic bone and joint infections. Traditionally erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and leukocyte cell count have been used, whereas C-reactive protein (CRP) has gained in popularity. We monitored 265 children at ages 3 months to 15 years with culture-positive osteoarticular infections with a predetermined series of ESR, CRP, and leukocyte count measurements. On admission, ESR exceeded 20 mm/hour in 94% and CRP exceeded 20 mg/L in 95% of the cases, the mean (+/- standard error of the mean) being 51 +/- 2 mm/hour and 87 +/- 4 mg/L, respectively. ESR normalized in 24 days and CRP in 10 days. Elevated CRP gave a slightly better sensitivity in diagnostics than ESR, but best sensitivity was gained with the combined use of ESR and CRP (98%). Elevated ESR or CRP was seen in all cases during the first 3 days. Measuring ESR and CRP on admission can help the clinician rule out an acute osteoarticular infection. CRP normalizes faster than ESR, providing a clear advantage in monitoring recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 866
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein
    Harrison, Michael
    AUSTRALIAN PRESCRIBER, 2015, 38 (03) : 93 - 94
  • [2] Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein
    Calderon, Aaron J.
    Wener, Mark H.
    HOSPITAL MEDICINE CLINICS, 2012, 1 (03) : E313 - E337
  • [3] ERYTHROCYTE SEDIMENTATION-RATE AND C-REACTIVE PROTEIN
    ABDELFATTAH, M
    SCHERER, R
    RUHENSTROTHBAUER, G
    KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1976, 54 (04): : 169 - 171
  • [4] The Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and the C-reactive Protein Test
    Batlivala, Sarosh P.
    PEDIATRICS IN REVIEW, 2009, 30 (02) : 72 - 74
  • [5] ERYTHROCYTE SEDIMENTATION-RATE AND C-REACTIVE PROTEIN
    RUHENSTROTHBAUER, G
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1992, 117 (26) : 1043 - 1043
  • [6] COMPARISON OF C-REACTIVE PROTEIN, HIGH SENSITIVITY C-REACTIVE PROTEIN AND ERYTHROCYTE SEDIMENTATION RATE WITH DISEASE ACTIVITY IN LUPUS
    Moder, K. G.
    Crowson, C. S.
    Snyder, M. R.
    Saenger, A. K.
    Matteson, E. L.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2014, 73 : 537 - 537
  • [7] The Many Myths of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein
    Wolfe, Frederick
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2009, 36 (08) : 1568 - 1569
  • [8] C-reactive protein versus erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white blood cell count and alkaline phosphatase in diagnosing bacteraemia in bone and joint infections
    Paakoknen, Markus
    Kallio, Markku J. T.
    Kallio, Pentti E.
    Peltola, Heikki
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2013, 49 (03) : E189 - E192
  • [9] C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate results reliably exclude invasive bacterial infections
    Paydar-Darian, Niloufar
    Kimia, Amir A.
    Monuteaux, Michael C.
    Michelson, Kenneth A.
    Landschaft, Assaf
    Maulden, Alexandra B.
    Chenard, Rachel L.
    Nigrovic, Lise E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 37 (08): : 1510 - 1515
  • [10] The infected diabetes-related foot: Comparison of erythrocyte sedementation rate/albumin and C-reactive protein/albumin ratios with erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein to differentiate bone and soft tissue infections
    Coye, Tyler L.
    Suludere, Mehmet A.
    Kang, Gu Eon
    Crisologo, P. Andrew
    Malone, Matthew
    Rogers, Lee C.
    Lavery, Lawrence A.
    WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2023, 31 (06) : 738 - 744