A randomized trial to assess the effect of cricoid displacing maneuver on the success rate of blind placement of double-lumen tube and Univent bronchial blocker

被引:3
|
作者
Xu, Zhao [1 ]
Yu, Hong [1 ]
Luo, Yuting [2 ]
Ye, Yuancai [1 ]
Zhou, Cheng [1 ,3 ]
Liang, Peng [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 37 Guoxuexiang, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Med, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Lab Anesthesia & Crit Care Med, Translat Neurosci Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Cricoid displacing maneuver; double-lumen tube; Univent; blind placement; complication; TORQUE CONTROL BLOCKER; LUNG ISOLATION; ENDOTRACHEAL-TUBE; ENDOBRONCHIAL BLOCKER; THORACIC-SURGERY; TRACHEAL TUBE; SORE THROAT; EXPERIENCE; DEVICE;
D O I
10.21037/apm-20-2065
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Double lumen tube (DLT) and Univent are two commonly used lung isolation devices that often require bronchoscopy assistance. In order to facilitate blind placement for situations where bronchoscopy was unavailable, the cricoid displacing maneuver (CDM) was adopted. This study was designed to explore whether the CDM could improve the successful blind placement rate in left lung isolation esophageal surgeries. Methods: One hundred and twenty ASA 1-3 patients who received left lung isolation esophageal surgeries from October 2014 to February 2016 and October 2018 to January 2020 were enrolled in this single-centered prospective assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. After anesthesia induction, patients were intubated either with DLT or Univent by applying the CDM, and the position of devices was checked by bronchoscopy. After turning into the right decubitus position, the devices were pulled back to the trachea, and placement was conducted once again. Successful placement rate for the first attempt, time needed for initial placement, malposition and reposition times by bronchoscopy during surgery, bronchus injury score, rank of lung isolation and postoperative anesthesia-related complications were recorded. Results: At supine position, the successful placement rates for the first attempt of DLT-CDM, DLT-control, Univent-CDM and Univent-Control were 100%, 76.7%, 96.7% and 66.7% respectively (DLT: P=0.016; Univent: P=0.003) while at right decubitus position were 86.7%, 66.7%, 93.3% and 66.7% (DLT: P=0.067; Univent: P=0.010). There was no significant difference in the time needed for successful intubation and no severe complications. Conclusions: The current study provided evidence that the CDM is an effective and safe blind endobronchial placement technique for left DLT and Univent. We suggest that CDM could be applied to the endobronchial placement of left DLT and Univent.
引用
收藏
页码:1976 / 1984
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Use of bronchial blocker to facilitate left double-lumen tube placement
    Chennakeshavallu, G. N.
    Sruthi, S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 65 (03) : 263 - +
  • [2] Fluoroscopy, a useful alternative for confirming accurate placement of double-lumen tube or bronchial blocker
    Date, Aparna
    Wagh, Harshal D.
    Shah, Milin
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 15 (04) : 473 - 474
  • [3] Individualized rotation of left double lumen endobronchial tube to improve placement success rate: a randomized controlled trial
    Zhou, Huiying
    Fei, Yuda
    Zhang, Yuelun
    Quan, Xiang
    Yi, Jie
    RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [4] A randomised trial comparing real-time double-lumen endobronchial tube placement with the Disposcope® with conventional blind placement
    Chen, P. T.
    Ting, C. K.
    Lee, M. Y.
    Cheng, H. W.
    Chan, K. H.
    Chang, W. K.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 (09) : 1097 - 1106
  • [5] Randomized clinical trial comparing double-lumen tube and EZ-Blocker® for single-lung ventilation
    Ruetzler, K.
    Grubhofer, G.
    Schmid, W.
    Papp, D.
    Nabecker, S.
    Hutschala, D.
    Lang, G.
    Hager, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (06) : 896 - 902
  • [6] Combined use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and a bronchial blocker vs. a double-lumen endobronchial tube in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Xue, Fu-Shan
    Gao, Xue
    Wan, Lei
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 92
  • [7] Combined use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and a bronchial blocker vs. a double-lumen endobronchial tube in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Nakanishi, Toshiyuki
    Sento, Yoshiki
    Kamimura, Yuji
    Nakamura, Ryuji
    Hashimoto, Hiroya
    Okuda, Katsuhiro
    Nakanishi, Ryoichi
    Sobue, Kazuya
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2023, 88
  • [8] Effect of postoperative ultrasound-guided internal superior laryngeal nerve block on sore throat after intubation of double-lumen bronchial tube: a randomized controlled double-blind trial
    Jingxian Wang
    Bin Chai
    Yujie Zhang
    Lidong Zheng
    Pengcheng Geng
    Li Zhan
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [9] Effect of postoperative ultrasound-guided internal superior laryngeal nerve block on sore throat after intubation of double-lumen bronchial tube: a randomized controlled double-blind trial
    Wang, Jingxian
    Chai, Bin
    Zhang, Yujie
    Zheng, Lidong
    Geng, Pengcheng
    Zhan, Li
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [10] Bronchial blocker versus left double-lumen endotracheal tube in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized-controlled trial examining time and quality of lung deflation
    Bussieres, Jean S.
    Somma, Jacques
    del Castillo, Jose Luis Carrasco
    Lemieux, Jerome
    Conti, Massimo
    Ugalde, Paula A.
    Gagne, Nathalie
    Lacasse, Yves
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2016, 63 (07): : 818 - 827