Is triple combination of different neurohormonal modulators recommended for treatment of mild-to-moderate congestive heart failure patients? (Results of Sadko-CHF study). Part 2

Aim. To assess different variants of neurohormonal (NH) modulation with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE-I) quinapril (Q), angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) valsartan (19 and their combination in addition to beta-adrenergic blocker bisoprolol (B) on functional status, quality of life (QL), parameters of left ventricular (LV) remodeling, main indices of 24-h heart rate variability (HRV) and NH profile in patients with stable mild-to-moderate CHF. Material and methods. 63 patients with CHF (NYHA class II-III) as a result of ischemic heart disease and dilated cardiomyopathy with LV EF < 40% were randomly assigned to one of the treatment variants on 1:1:1 basis: B+Q (n = 22; mean daily dose of B-5.5 mg; Q-15.4 mg), B+V (n = 23, mean daily dose of B = 4.8 mg, V = 128 mg) and combination of B+Q+V (n = 18; mean daily dose of B = 4.1 mg; Q = 12 mg; V = 82 mg). At baseline, all the patients in this study were on background B treatment and according to the study design Q or V were then added to B at randomization. NYHA FC, 6-min walking test (6MT), QL, 2D-echocardiography, plasma rennin activity (PRA), angiotensin II (AT-II), aldosterone (Ald), norepinephrine (NE), epinephrine (E), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations and 24-hour HRV parameters were investigated at baseline, 3 and 6 months after randomization. Results. During the study NYHA FC improvement was revealed in all 3 treatment groups with comparative significant changes in 6MT distance by 20.4%, 19.1% and 19.4% in B+Q, B+V and B+Q+V groups. QL maximally decreased in B+V combination (from 45 to 21 points). LV volumes significantly decreased and L V ejection fraction (EF) increased in all groups to the end of the study. Triple combination had no additional effect on LV volumes and LVEF changes compared to B+Q and B+V groups. Maximally plasma NE concentrations decreased in B+Q group (from 650 to 430 pg/ml, p = 0.007). A worse effect was observed in the combination of B+Q+V, with any NE changes in B+V group. The E concentration increased significantly (from 215 to 295 pg/ml, p = 0.024) in the B+Q+V group at the end of the study. Plasma A-II concentration did not differ from the baseline during the study in B+Q group, but significantly increased in B+V group and maximally in B+Q+V group (from 11.4 to 23.5 pg/ml, p = 0.009). To the end of the study plasma. Ald concentrations remain reduced significantly only in B+V group. The level of BNP significantly decreased in all 3 treatment groups. Significant changes in HRV indices, both in time and frequency domain, were revealed in the B+Q group at 3-month follow-up and SDNN increased on month 24 (p = 0.039). These changes became insignificant at the end of the study. The lesser effect was revealed in B+Q+V group, with insignificant trend toward an increase of SDNN to the end of the study. HRV indices did not improve in the B+V group. Conclusion. During long-term treatment the triple combination of B+Q+V has no significant advantages over B+Q and B+V by the functional status, QL and parameters of LV remodeling in patients with mild-to-moderate CHF. The combination of B+Q has more potent effect on 24-hour HRV parameters, sympatho-adrenal activity and renal function compared to B+V and B+Q+V groups in CHF patients in our study. The combination B+Q+V may have a negative effect on NH profile (excessive activation of ATII and E) in CHF patients. The triple combination is not recommended for therapy of stable mild-to-moderate CHF patients.