Effect of selective second-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction and its timing on pregnancy outcome

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Yan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xie-Tong [1 ]
Li, Hong-Yan [1 ]
Hou, Hai-Yan [1 ]
Wang, Hong [1 ]
Wang, Yan-Yun [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Prov Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jinan 250021, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Qianfoshang Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jinan 250021, Peoples R China
关键词
Pregnancy; twins; multifetal pregnancy reduction; pregnancy outcome; FETAL; MATURITY; TWINS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the impact of multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) on the progress and outcome of pregnancy, we compared the outcomes of this procedure performed at different stages of gestation. Methods: 302 consecutive patients admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University from January, 2002, to February 2012 with multifetal pregnancies were included. All pregnancies were induced by assisted reproductive technology. 152 multifetal pregnancies (triplets or quadruplets) were reduced to twin pregnancies (RT) and 150 non-reduced twin pregnancies (NRT) received no intervention. MFPR was performed at 12-13(+6) weeks of gestation (MFPR12) in 91 RT cases, 14-15(+6) weeks in 32 cases (MFPR14), while at 16-24(+6) weeks of gestation in 29 cases (MFPR16). The procedure was performed by transabdominal ultrasoundguided intracardiac injection of 10% KCl solution. Results: Pregnancy loss rates in the RT and NRT groups were 14.5% and 6.7%, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (X-2 = 4.857, P = 0.028). Pregnancy loss rate for the MFPR16 group (31.0%) was significantly higher than for MFPR12 (8.8%, P = 0.007) and NRT group (6.7%, P = 0.000). The differences between pregnancy loss rates of the MFPR12 and MFPR 14 groups and the rate of NRT group were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: There was an increased risk of pregnancy loss in the RT pregnancy group in comparison with NRT group. However, performing MFPR before gestational age of 16 weeks could reduce the risk of pregnancy loss significantly.
引用
收藏
页码:5533 / 5537
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The early second-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction improves pregnancy outcome
    Jiang, Jing-Jing
    Han, Ting
    Zhu, Yan-Hui
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 48 (01): : 164 - 167
  • [2] Second-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction facilitates prenatal diagnosis before the procedure
    Geva, E
    Fait, G
    Yovel, I
    Lerner-Geva, L
    Yaron, Y
    Daniel, Y
    Amit, A
    Lessing, JB
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (03) : 505 - 508
  • [3] Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction: Pregnancy Outcome
    Demirol, Nimet Aygul
    Guven, Suleyman
    Gurgan, Timur
    JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 7 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [5] Unruptured second-trimester ovarian pregnancy
    Elwell, Kyler E.
    Sailors, Joseph L.
    Denson, Pamela K.
    Hoffman, Barbara
    Wai, Clifford Y.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (09) : 1483 - 1486
  • [6] Recurrent second-trimester pregnancy loss
    Harger, JH
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (02) : 147 - 147
  • [7] Multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination
    Bush, MC
    Eddleman, KA
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2003, 30 (03) : 623 - +
  • [8] MULTIFETAL REDUCTION OF TRIPLETS AND PREGNANCY OUTCOME
    PORRECO, RP
    BURKE, MS
    HENDRIX, ML
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 78 (03): : 335 - 339
  • [9] Multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination
    Beriwal, Sridevi
    Impey, Lawrence
    Ioannou, Christos
    OBSTETRICIAN & GYNAECOLOGIST, 2020, 22 (04): : 284 - 292
  • [10] MULTIFETAL PREGNANCY REDUCTION AND SELECTIVE TERMINATION
    EVANS, MI
    DOMMERGUES, M
    JOHNSON, MP
    DUMEZ, Y
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 7 (02) : 126 - 129