Life-cycle analysis of drop-in biojet fuel produced from British Columbia forest residues and wood pellets via fast-pyrolysis

被引:22
|
作者
Ringsred, Anna [1 ]
van Dyk, Susan [1 ]
Saddler, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Forest Prod Biotechnol & Bioenergy Grp, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V8N 3E4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Life-cycle analysis; Biojet fuel; Sustainable aviation fuel; Greenhouse gas emissions; Fast pyrolysis; Biocrude; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116587
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A well-to-wake life-cycle analysis of biojet fuel produced from pyrolysis-derived biocrudes upgraded via hydrotreatment was carried out and compared to petroleum-derived jet fuel. The life-cycle analysis model compared a 100 million liter-per-year upgraded pyrolysis oil facility at three locations in British Columbia, Canada using British Columbia pellet and forest residue feedstocks. The carbon intensity of the pyrolysis-based biojet fuel was 69-71% lower than conventional fossil-based jet fuel, depending on the location and type of woody biomass feedstock that was used. Methodological choices such as the source of the hydrogen consumed during pyrolysis oil upgrading and the co-product method used had the greatest impact on the carbon intensity of the biojet fuel, while technical factors such as the moisture content of the biomass feedstock and the overall yield had a moderate impact on the carbon intensity . Optimizing these various parameters could reduce the carbon intensity of pyrolysis-derived biojet fuel by 110% when compared to petroleum jet fuel.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Environmental footprints of British Columbia wood pellets from a simplified life cycle analysis
    Pa, Ann
    Craven, Jill S.
    Bi, Xiaotao T.
    Melin, Staffan
    Sokhansanj, Shahab
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (02): : 220 - 231
  • [2] Environmental footprints of British Columbia wood pellets from a simplified life cycle analysis
    Ann Pa
    Jill S. Craven
    Xiaotao T. Bi
    Staffan Melin
    Shahab Sokhansanj
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 220 - 231
  • [3] Life-cycle assessment of transportation biofuels from hydrothermal liquefaction of forest residues in British Columbia
    Yuhao Nie
    Xiaotao Bi
    Biotechnology for Biofuels, 11
  • [4] Life-cycle assessment of transportation biofuels from hydrothermal liquefaction of forest residues in British Columbia
    Nie, Yuhao
    Bi, Xiaotao
    BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2018, 11
  • [5] Dynamic life-cycle carbon analysis for fast pyrolysis biofuel produced from pine residues: implications of carbon temporal effects
    Kai Lan
    Longwen Ou
    Sunkyu Park
    Stephen S. Kelley
    Prakash Nepal
    Hoyoung Kwon
    Hao Cai
    Yuan Yao
    Biotechnology for Biofuels, 14
  • [6] Dynamic life-cycle carbon analysis for fast pyrolysis biofuel produced from pine residues: implications of carbon temporal effects
    Lan, Kai
    Ou, Longwen
    Park, Sunkyu
    Kelley, Stephen S.
    Nepal, Prakash
    Kwon, Hoyoung
    Cai, Hao
    Yao, Yuan
    BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2021, 14 (01)
  • [7] Life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of biochar produced from forest residues using portable systems
    Sahoo, Kamalakanta
    Upadhyay, Amit
    Runge, Troy
    Bergman, Richard
    Puettmann, Maureen
    Bilek, Edward
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (01): : 189 - 213
  • [8] Life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of biochar produced from forest residues using portable systems
    Kamalakanta Sahoo
    Amit Upadhyay
    Troy Runge
    Richard Bergman
    Maureen Puettmann
    Edward Bilek
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 189 - 213
  • [9] Life cycle greenhouse gas analysis of bioenergy generation alternatives using forest and wood residues in remote locations: A case study in British Columbia, Canada
    Cambero, Claudia
    Alexandre, Mariane Hans
    Sowlati, Taraneh
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2015, 105 : 59 - 72