A randomized trial comparing the nephrotoxicity of cisplatin/ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy with or without amifostine in patients with solid tumors

被引:79
|
作者
Hartmann, JT
Fels, LM
Knop, S
Stolte, H
Kanz, L
Bokemeyer, C
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, UKT Med Ctr 2, Dept Hematol & Oncol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Sch Med, Div Nephrol, Hannover, Germany
[3] Soc Sci & Technol Transfer GWT EV, Berlin, Germany
关键词
nephrotoxicity; cisplatin; ifosfamide; protection; amifostine; hypomagnesemia;
D O I
10.1023/A:1006490226104
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the degree of kidney damage during cisplatin/ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy and its possible prevention by amifostine. Thirty-one patients with solid tumors stratified according to pretreatment were randomized to receive VIP- or TIP-chemotherapy with or without amifostine (910 mg/m(2)) given as a short infusion prior to cisplatin. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)), ifosfamide (4 g/m(2)) and either etoposide (500 mg/m(2)) (= VIP) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) (= TIP) repeated at 3 weekly intervals. For all patients the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured by creatinine-clearance, serum creatinine, electrolytes and differential urinary protein/enzyme excretion were determined prior to, during and after each cycle. A total of 62 cycles of chemotherapy were evaluable. In the amifostine-group GFR was fully maintained after application of two cycles of chemotherapy, whereas in the control group a > 30%-reduction of median GFR (108 to 80 ml/min) was observed (p < 0.001). Patients receiving amifostine had a lower degree of high molecular weight proteins excretion indicating less glomerular damage. In both groups significant increases of tubular marker profiles peaking at day 3 after chemotherapy were observed with a nearly complete reversibility of these changes prior to the next chemotherapy cycle. The number of patients with low magnesium serum levels during treatment was 17% after amifostine application versus 69% in control patients. The results seem to indicate that treatment with amifostine can preserve GFR after application of two cisplatin/ifosfamide-based chemotherapy cycles. This may be advantageous if repetitive cycles of chemotherapy or subsequent administration of high dose chemotherapy is planned.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 289
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Randomized Trial Comparing the Nephrotoxicity of Cisplatin/Ifosfamide-Based Combination Chemotherapy with or without Amifostine in Patients with Solid Tumors
    Jörg T. Hartmann
    Lüder M. Fels
    Stefan Knop
    Hilmar Stolte
    Lothar Kanz
    Carsten Bokemeyer
    Investigational New Drugs, 2000, 18 : 281 - 289
  • [2] The use of reduced doses of amifostine to ameliorate nephrotoxicity of cisplatin/ifosfamide-based chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors
    Hartmann, JT
    Knop, S
    Fels, LM
    van Vangerow, A
    Stolte, H
    Kanz, L
    Bokemeyer, C
    ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2000, 11 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [3] Ifosfamide-based salvage chemotherapy for patients with resistant germ cell tumors - Our experiences
    Donat, D
    Stojkov, J
    Zivanovic, A
    Djozic, J
    Miljkovic, LJ
    Donat, A
    Budisin, N
    Novakovic, P
    Grahovac, Z
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A : 910 - 910
  • [4] A randomized trial comparing the toxicity and the treatment costs of HD-VIC plus PBSC transplantation with or without amifostine (AMI) in patients with solid tumors
    Hartmann, J
    von Vangerow, A
    Knop, S
    Brugger, W
    Fels, L
    Stolte, H
    Kanz, L
    Bokemeyer, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 : S361 - S361
  • [5] Electrolytes supplementation can decrease the risk of nephrotoxicity in patients with solid tumors undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin
    Omary M. S. Minzi
    Tatu E. Lyimo
    Francis F. Furia
    Alphonce I. Marealle
    Manase Kilonzi
    George M. Bwire
    Christina Malichewe
    BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, 21
  • [6] Electrolytes supplementation can decrease the risk of nephrotoxicity in patients with solid tumors undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin
    Minzi, Omary M. S.
    Lyimo, Tatu E.
    Furia, Francis F.
    Marealle, Alphonce I.
    Kilonzi, Manase
    Bwire, George M.
    Malichewe, Christina
    BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 21 (01):
  • [7] RANDOMIZED PHASE-II TRIAL COMPARING 2 CHEMOTHERAPY COMBINATIONS FOR NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER - MITOMYCIN, IFOSFAMIDE, AND CISPLATIN VERSUS VINDESINE, IFOSFAMIDE, AND CISPLATIN
    BARON, MG
    ARTAL, A
    GARRIDO, P
    GIRON, CG
    ORDONEZ, A
    FELIU, J
    BERROCAL, A
    BARON, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1993, 16 (04): : 310 - 314
  • [8] Phase III randomized trial comparing cisplatin and carboplatin with or without ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Sculier, JP
    Paesmans, M
    Thiriaux, J
    Lecomte, J
    Bureau, G
    Giner, V
    Efremidis, A
    Lafitte, JJ
    Berchier, MC
    Alexopoulos, CG
    Zacharias, C
    Mommen, P
    Ninane, V
    Klastersky, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (04) : 1388 - 1396
  • [9] Pharmacologic study of paclitaxel administered with or without the cytoprotective agent amifostine, and given as a single agent or in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors
    Van den Brande, J
    Panday, VRN
    Hoekman, K
    Rosing, H
    Huijskes, RVHP
    Verheijen, RHM
    Beijnen, JH
    Vermorken, JB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2001, 24 (04): : 401 - 403
  • [10] Phase I/II study of taxol/ifosfamide/cisplatin (TIP) combination chemotherapy (CMT) in advanced solid tumors (ST)
    Kosmas, C
    Tsavaris, N
    Polyzos, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 : 1140 - 1140