Routine application of next-generation sequencing testing in uro-oncology-Are we ready for the next step of personalised medicine?

被引:7
|
作者
Rodler, Severin [1 ]
Jung, Andreas [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Greif, Philipp A. [4 ]
Ruehlmann, Katharina [5 ]
Apfelbeck, Maria [1 ]
Tamalunas, Alexander [1 ]
Kretschmer, Alexander [1 ]
Schulz, Gerald B. [1 ]
Szabados, Bernadett [6 ]
Stief, Christian [1 ]
Heinemann, Volker [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Westphalen, Christoph B. [4 ,5 ]
Casuscelli, Jozefina [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Urol, Univ Hosp, Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Pathol Inst, Univ Hosp, Munich, Germany
[3] DKTK, German Canc Consortium, Munich, Germany
[4] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Med 3, Munich, Germany
[5] Comprehens Canc Ctr, Munich, Germany
[6] Barts Canc Inst, London, England
关键词
Precision oncology; Next-generation sequencing; Molecular tumour board; Uro-oncology; GENE FUSIONS; DNA-REPAIR; TARGETS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2020.12.024
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim of the study: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) might represent a valuable diagnostic tool to identify somatic alterations and enable personalised medicine in uro-oncology. We aim to determine feasibility and impact of routine NGS in clinical practice. Methods: Tumours from patients with genitourinary cancers were subjected to NGS. Results were discussed in a dedicated molecular tumour board. Statistical analyses included chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Between 2017 and 2020, 65 patients with advanced genitourinary cancers were consecutively enrolled. Number of tests increased (28 tests in 2020) and diagnostic turnaround time for generating output decreased (17.5 days [range 13-35]). Median patient's age was 62 years (range 33-84), and most NGS assays were performed upon start of systemic treatment (range 0-6 of treatment lines). 62/66 sequenced samples generated a report. Fifty samples (80.6%) showed at least one molecular alteration. Most prevalent alterations were TP53 (32.3%), PIK3CA (14.5%) and TMPRSS2-ERG (9.7%). Sequencing revealed potentially druggable targets in 29 samples (46.8%). Based on NGS results, six patients underwent therapy change, whereas for three patients, coverage of recommended off-label therapy was denied by health insurances. Conclusions: NGS is increasingly feasible in clinical routine for patients with genitourinary cancers. Number of performed analyses is constantly growing, and turnaround time to therapy recommendation is decreasing. While the majority of tumours harbour clinically relevant mutations, alterations related to urologic cancers are underrepresented, thus treatment changes occurred only in a minority of patients. Further, access to target agents remains a considerable obstacle in the consequent implementation of precision uro-oncology. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Next-generation sequencing in the clinic: are we ready?
    Leslie G. Biesecker
    Wylie Burke
    Isaac Kohane
    Sharon E. Plon
    Ron Zimmern
    [J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2012, 13 : 818 - 824
  • [2] Next-generation sequencing in the clinic: are we ready?
    Biesecker, Leslie G.
    Burke, Wylie
    Kohane, Isaac
    Plon, Sharon E.
    Zimmern, Ron
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2012, 13 (11) : 818 - 824
  • [3] Next-generation sequencing and empowering personalised cancer medicine
    McDermott, Ultan
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2015, 20 (12) : 1470 - 1475
  • [4] Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology in the Era of Precision Medicine
    Blumenthal, Gideon M.
    Mansfield, Elizabeth
    Pazdur, Richard
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2016, 2 (01) : 13 - 14
  • [5] Next generation sequencing and tumor mutation profiling: are we ready for routine use in the oncology clinic?
    Tripathy, Debu
    Harnden, Kathleen
    Blackwell, Kimberly
    Robson, Mark
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2014, 12
  • [6] Next generation sequencing and tumor mutation profiling: are we ready for routine use in the oncology clinic?
    Debu Tripathy
    Kathleen Harnden
    Kimberly Blackwell
    Mark Robson
    [J]. BMC Medicine, 12
  • [7] Next-generation sequencing: ready for the clinics?
    Desai, A. N.
    Jere, A.
    [J]. CLINICAL GENETICS, 2012, 81 (06) : 503 - 510
  • [8] Next in line in next-generation sequencing: are we there yet?
    Bavarva, Jasmin H.
    Bavarva, Megha J.
    Karunasena, Enusha
    [J]. PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2015, 16 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [9] Are Next-Generation Sequencing Tools Ready for the Cloud?
    Celesti, Antonio
    Celesti, Fabrizio
    Fazio, Maria
    Bramanti, Placido
    Villari, Massimo
    [J]. TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 35 (06) : 486 - 489
  • [10] Next-generation carrier screening: are we ready?
    Thomas W Prior
    [J]. Genome Medicine, 6