Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in patients with prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy

被引:8
|
作者
Jeong, Jae-Uk [1 ]
Nam, Taek-Keun [1 ]
Song, Ju-Young [1 ]
Yoon, Mee Sun [1 ]
Ahn, Sung-Ja [1 ]
Chung, Woong-Ki [1 ]
Cho, Ick Joon [1 ]
Kim, Yong-Hyub [1 ]
Cho, Shin Haeng [1 ]
Jung, Seung Il [2 ]
Kwon, Dong Deuk [2 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Hwasun Hosp, Med Sch, Dept Radiat Oncol, 322 Seoyang Ro, Hwasun 58128, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Hwasun Hosp, Med Sch, Dept Urol, Hwasun, South Korea
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL | 2019年 / 37卷 / 03期
关键词
Prostate neoplasms; Prostatectomy; Postoperative radiotherapy; EARLY SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; MICROVASCULAR INVASION; ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; PROGRESSION; RADIATION; ANTIGEN; MEN; THERAPY;
D O I
10.3857/roj.2019.00332
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in prostate cancer patients who underwent adjuvant or salvage postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) Materials and Methods: A total of 168 patients with prostate cancer received PORT after RP, with a follow-up of >= 12 months. Biochemical failure after PORT was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >= 0.2 ng/mL after PORT or initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for increasing PSA levels regardless of the value. We analyzed the clinical outcomes including survivals, failure patterns, and prognostic factors affecting the outcomes. Results: In total, 120 patients (71.4%) received salvage PORT after PSA levels were >0.2 ng/mL or owing to clinical failure. The 5-year biochemical failure-free survival (BCFFS), clinical failure-free survival (CFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival, and cause-specific survival rates were 78.3%, 94.3%, 95.0%, 95.8%, and 97.3%, respectively, during a follow-up range of 12-157 months (median: 64 months) after PORT. On multivariate analysis, PSA level of <= 1.0 ng/m L at the time of receiving PORT predicted favorable BCFFS, CFFS, and DMFS. LVI predicted worse CFFS (p = 0.004) and DMFS (p = 0.015). Concurrent and/or adjuvant ADT resulted in favorable prognosis for BCFFS (p < 0.001) and CFFS (p = 0.017). Conclusion: For patients with adverse pathologic findings, PORT should be initiated as early as possible after continence recovery after RP. Even after administering PORT, LVI was an unfavorable predictive factor, and further intensive adjuvant therapy should be considered for these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 223
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lymphovascular invasion in prostate cancer - Prognostic significance in patients treated with radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy
    Brooks, JP
    Albert, PS
    O'Connell, J
    McLeod, DG
    Poggi, MM
    [J]. CANCER, 2006, 106 (07) : 1521 - 1526
  • [2] Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion of bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy
    Quek, ML
    Stein, JP
    Nichols, PW
    Cai, J
    Miranda, G
    Groshen, S
    Daneshmand, S
    Skinner, EC
    Skinner, DG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (01): : 103 - 106
  • [3] Prognostic Significance of Lymphovascular Invasion in Bladder Cancer
    Sathianathen, Niranjan
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15 : 63 - 63
  • [4] Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in clinically localized prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    Baydar, Dilek Ertoy
    Baseskioglu, Barbaros
    Ozen, Haluk
    Geyik, Pinar Ozdemir
    [J]. THESCIENTIFICWORLDJOURNAL, 2008, 8 : 303 - 312
  • [5] Prognostic Significance of Lymphovascular Invasion in Sporadic Colorectal Cancer
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Jang, Se Jin
    Kim, Tae Won
    Kim, Jong Hoon
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (04) : 377 - 384
  • [6] The clinical prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in gastric cancer
    Fujikawa, Hirohito
    Yamada, Takanobu
    Koumori, Keisuke
    Watanabe, Hayato
    Kano, Kazuki
    Shimoda, Yota
    Rino, Yasushi
    Masuda, Munetaka
    Ogata, Takashi
    Oshima, Takashi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (04)
  • [7] Prognostic Significance of Lymphovascular and Perivascular Invasion in Colon Cancer
    Suren, Dinc
    Yildirim, Mustafa
    Elal, Ruksan
    Yildiz, Mustafa
    Sezer, Cem
    Bulbuller, Nurullah
    Eryilmaz, Ramazan
    Alikanoglu, Arsenal Sezgin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2013, 4 (04) : 262 - 264
  • [8] The Prognostic Significance of Lymphovascular Invasion on Biopsy Specimens in Lung Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy
    Massabeau, Carole
    Filleron, Thomas
    Wakil, Georges
    Rouquette, Isabelle
    Bachaud, Jean-Marc
    Leguellec, Sophie
    Delisle, Marie-Bernadette
    Toulas, Christine
    Mazieres, Julien
    Moyal, Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan
    [J]. CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2012, 13 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [9] Prognostic significance of lymphovascular or perineural invasion in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Lee, Jae Hyuk
    Kim, Hyeong Rok
    Kim, Young Jin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 206 (05): : 758 - 763
  • [10] PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF LYMPHOVASCULAR INVASION IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH SALVAGE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR RADIATION-RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER
    Broenimann, Stephan
    Quhal, Fahad
    Laukhtina, Ekaterina
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Briganti, Alberto
    Rajwa, Pawel
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E242 - E242