One Standard Fits All? The Pros and Cons of Performance Standard Adjustments

被引:20
|
作者
Barnow, Burt S. [1 ]
Heinrich, Carolyn J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Inst Policy Studies, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02111.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Despite the wide-ranging use of performance measures within the public sector and the growing use of performance bonuses to recognize performance achievements, the use of formal performance standards adjustment procedures in public performance measurement systems is relatively rare. Burt S. Barnow of Johns Hopkins University and Carolyn J. Heinrich of the University of Wisconsin-Madison set forth the basic arguments in favor of and against the use of formal or informal procedures for adjusting-performance expectations. They describe how performance standards adjustments processes are currently (or have been) in use, review the evidence of their effectiveness or problems encountered in their application, and explore the consequences of the inadequacy of performance standards adjustments, The authors offer recommendations for the improvement of public sector performance measurement systems and conclude why this area remains fruitful for future research experimentation.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 71
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] One standard fits all
    Davis, B
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 17 (09) : 43 - 44
  • [2] Standard Distributions: One Graph Fits All
    Wagner, Clifford
    [J]. TEACHING STATISTICS, 2007, 29 (02) : 54 - 56
  • [3] Alternatives to standard cow milk: pros and cons
    Hozyasz, Kamil K.
    Slowik, Malgorzata
    [J]. PRZEGLAD GASTROENTEROLOGICZNY, 2013, 8 (02): : 98 - 107
  • [4] Defining standard of practice: pros and cons of the usual care arm
    Angriman, Federico
    Masse, Marie-Helene
    Adhikari, Neill K. J.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 25 (05) : 498 - 504
  • [5] The pros and cons of beyond standard model interpretations of ANITA events
    Anchordoqui, L. A.
    Antoniadis, I.
    Barger, V.
    Cornet, F.
    Garcia Canal, C.
    Gutierrez, M.
    Illana, J. I.
    Learned, J. G.
    Marfatia, D.
    Masip, M.
    Pakvasa, S.
    Palomares-Rui, S.
    Soriano, J. F.
    Weiler, T. J.
    [J]. 36TH INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, ICRC2019, 2021,
  • [6] One Size Fits All? Using Standard Global Tools in Humanitarian Logistics
    Jahre, Marianne
    Ergun, Ozlem
    Goentzel, Jarrod
    [J]. HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY: SCIENCE, SYSTEMS AND GLOBAL IMPACT 2015, HUMTECH2015, 2015, 107 : 18 - 26
  • [7] Standard cystectomy fits all: truth or myth?
    Roth, Beat
    Thalmann, George N.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2015, 4 (03) : 254 - 260
  • [8] Antiplatelet monotherapy after DAPT: is clopidogrel the new standard? Pros and cons
    Kim, Hyo-Soo
    Kang, Jeehoon
    Stefanini, Giulio
    De Caterina, Raffaele
    [J]. EUROINTERVENTION, 2024, 20 (12)
  • [9] Pros and cons of using a standard protocol to test germination of alpine species
    Vera Margreiter
    Konrad Pagitz
    Christian Berg
    Patrick Schwager
    Brigitta Erschbamer
    [J]. Plant Ecology, 2020, 221 : 1045 - 1067
  • [10] Pros and cons of using a standard protocol to test germination of alpine species
    Margreiter, Vera
    Pagitz, Konrad
    Berg, Christian
    Schwager, Patrick
    Erschbamer, Brigitta
    [J]. PLANT ECOLOGY, 2020, 221 (11) : 1045 - 1067