Optimizing the fitting-surface preparation of zirconia restorations for bonding to dentin

被引:11
|
作者
Franz, Alexander [1 ]
Winkler, Olivia [1 ]
Lettner, Stefan [1 ]
Oppinger, Simon [1 ]
Hauser, Anna [1 ]
Haidar, Marwan [1 ]
Moritz, Andreas [1 ]
Watts, David C. [2 ,3 ]
Schedle, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Univ Clin Dent, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Med Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Photon Sci Inst, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Zirconia restorations; Adhesive cementation; Zirconia-cement-interface; Glaze-on-technique; Air abrasion; LUTING CEMENT; RESIN CEMENT; AIR-ABRASION; STRENGTH; ADHESION; METAANALYSIS; RETENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2020.12.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. The aim of this study was to identify the relative strengths and weaknesses of different interfaces within the multilayer structure of a zirconia crown restoration when applying different surface pretreatments. These include the influence on shear strengths of different air abrasion protocols, glaze-on techniques, zirconia primers and self-adhesive cements for either the complex structure: zirconia / self adhesive resin composite cement (RCC) / bovine dentin substrate (part 1) or the RCC / zirconia substrate (part 2). Methods. In Part 1, zirconia discs, pretreated by either glaze-on techniques or air abrasion using Rocatec (TM) Soft, were bonded to bovine dentin substrates with different self-adhesive RCCs. In Part 2, steel-cylinders were bonded to zirconia cuboid substrates, pretreated by either different protocols for air-abrasion or a glaze-on-technique, with different self-adhesive RCCs. Shear bond strengths (SBS) were measured for all interfacial combinations. Results. In part 1, application of air abrasion using Rocatec (TM) Soft significantly increased the SBS of zirconia to dentin compared to control specimens without pretreatment, while glaze-on techniques did not increase the SBS. Pretreatment of zirconia surfaces with two primers (either Clearfil Ceramic Primer, or Monobond S) showed significantly higher SBS than the controls. Cementations with RelyX Unicem 2 Automix showed significantly higher SBS than with MaxCem Elite. In Part 2, all air abrasion protocols increased the SBS, but there was no significant difference between these protocols. Again the glaze-on technique did not increase SBS. A significant difference between the two RCCs was again observed. When zirconia substrates were air abraded, regardless of which protocol was applied, the highest SBS were obtained by Calibra with P&B active followed by Panavia with or without Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus. Calibra applied without P&B active exhibited the lowest SBS. Significance. Pretreatment of zirconia substrates using air abrasion and/or ceramic primers increased the SBS of the zirconia cement interface. For all tested glaze-on treatments, in our experimental setting no effect was observed. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Academy of Dental Materials. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 476
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DENTIN BONDING STUDY - VARIATIONS IN SURFACE PREPARATION
    MOWERY, AS
    PARKER, M
    OSBORNE, JW
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1986, 65 : 315 - 315
  • [2] Surface treatment of dentin with GLUMA and iron compounds for bonding indirect restorations
    Baba, N
    Taira, Y
    Matsumura, H
    Atsuta, M
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 29 (11) : 1052 - 1058
  • [3] DENTIN BONDING VS ENAMEL BONDING OF COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS - A CLINICAL-EVALUATION
    BERRY, TG
    OSBORNE, JW
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 1989, 5 (02) : 90 - 92
  • [4] DENTIN BONDING VS ENAMEL BONDING OF COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS - A 2 YEAR EVALUATION
    BERRY, TG
    OSBORNE, JW
    HATCH, RA
    GALE, EN
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 : 130 - 130
  • [5] Construction of a silicate-based epitaxial transition film on a zirconia ceramic surface to improve the bonding quality of zirconia restorations
    Liu, Xiuju
    Wang, Han
    Yu, Shiyang
    Zhao, Qi
    Shi, Zuosen
    Cui, Zhanchen
    Zhu, Song
    RSC ADVANCES, 2020, 10 (54) : 32476 - 32484
  • [6] COMPARING THE RESISTANCE OF DENTIN BONDING AGENTS AND PINS IN AMALGAM RESTORATIONS
    IMBERY, TA
    BURGESS, JO
    BATZER, RC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 126 (06): : 753 - 759
  • [7] Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers
    Berry, FA
    Parker, SD
    Rice, D
    Munoz, CA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1996, 9 (04): : 174 - 178
  • [8] THE EFFECTS OF DENTIN BONDING AGENTS ON MARGINAL LEAKAGE OF COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS
    SAUNDERS, WP
    GRIEVE, AR
    RUSSELL, EM
    ALANI, AH
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1990, 17 (06) : 519 - 527
  • [9] Fatigue performance of fully-stabilized zirconia polycrystals monolithic restorations: The effects of surface treatments at the bonding surface
    Cadore-Rodrigues, Ana Carolina
    Machado, Pablo Soares
    de Oliveira, Jivago Schumacher
    Jahn, Sergio Luiz
    Callegari, Gustavo Luiz
    Dorneles, Lucio Strazzabosco
    de Lima Burgo, Thiago Augusto
    Rippe, Marilia Pivetta
    Rocha Pereira, Gabriel Kalil
    Valandro, Luiz Felipe
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2020, 110
  • [10] Enhancing bonding of zirconia lithium silicate ceramics to dentin: The effect of surface treatment and resin cement
    Yousef, Lama W.
    Baig, Mirza R.
    Qudeimat, Muawia A.
    Matinlinna, Jukka P.
    Al-Shammari, Mohammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2024, 132