Evaluation of the Binax and Biotest urinary antigen kits for detection of Legionnaires' disease due to multiple serogroups and species of Legionella

被引:54
|
作者
Benson, RF
Tang, PW
Fields, BS
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Resp Dis Branch, Div Bacterial & Mycot Dis, Natl Ctr Infect Dis, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[2] Minist Hlth & Long Term Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.38.7.2763-2765.2000
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The Binax and the Biotest urinary antigen kits for the detection of Legionnaires' disease caused by organisms other than Legionella pneumophila were compared by testing 45 urine samples from non-Legionella pneumophila serogroup I patients previously positive in a broad-spectrum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Eighteen were positive with the Binax kit, and 13 were positive with the Biotest, Although neither kit is as sensitive as ELISA these results extend the number of serogroups and species of Legionella that can be diagnosed with the Binax or Biotest kit.
引用
收藏
页码:2763 / 2765
页数:3
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Binax and Biotest Legionella urinary antigen kits - Author's reply
    Benson, RF
    Fields, BS
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (04) : 1682 - 1682
  • [2] Comparison of the sensitivity of the Legionella urinary antigen EIA kits from Binax and Biotest with urine from patients with infections caused by less common serogroups and subgroups of Legionella
    Olsen, C. W.
    Elverdal, P.
    Jorgensen, C. S.
    Uldum, S. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 28 (07) : 817 - 820
  • [3] Comparison of the sensitivity of the Legionella urinary antigen EIA kits from Binax and Biotest with urine from patients with infections caused by less common serogroups and subgroups of Legionella
    C. W. Olsen
    P. Elverdal
    C. S. Jørgensen
    S. A. Uldum
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2009, 28 : 817 - 820
  • [4] Cross-reactivity and sensitivity of two Legionella urinary antigen kits, Biotest EIA and Binax NOW, to extracted antigens from various serogroups of L-pneumophila and other Legionella species
    Okada, C
    Kura, F
    Wada, A
    Inagawa, H
    Lee, GH
    Matsushita, H
    MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (01) : 51 - 54
  • [5] Comparison of non-serogroup 1 detection by biotest and binax Legionella urinary antigen enzyme immunoassays
    Horn, J
    LEGIONELLA, 2002, : 207 - 210
  • [6] Detection of Legionella pneumophila antigen in urine samples by the BinaxNOW immunochromatographic assay and comparison with both Binax Legionella Urinary Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) and Biotest Legionella urinary antigen EIA
    Helbig, JH
    Uldum, SA
    Lück, PC
    Harrison, TG
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 50 (06) : 509 - 516
  • [7] Comparison of the Binax Legionella urinary antigen enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with the biotest Legionella Urin Antigen EIA for detection of Legionella antigen in both concentrated and nonconcentrated urine samples
    Domínguez, JA
    Galí, N
    Pedroso, P
    Fargas, A
    Padilla, E
    Manterola, JM
    Matas, L
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (09) : 2718 - 2722
  • [8] Immunochromatic kits Xpect Legionella and BinaxNOW Legionella for detection of Legionella pneumophila urinary antigen have low sensitivities for the diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease
    Svarrer, Christina Wiid
    Lueck, Christian
    Elverdal, Pernille Landsbo
    Uldum, Soren A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 61 (02) : 213 - 217
  • [9] Comparison of Binax Legionella Urinary Antigen EIA kit with Binax RIA Urinary Antigen kit for detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen
    Hackman, BA
    Plouffe, JF
    Benson, RF
    Fields, BS
    Breiman, RF
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (06) : 1579 - 1580
  • [10] Detection of Legionella Species in Clinical Samples: Comparison of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Urinary Antigen Detection Kits
    M. Koide
    F. Higa
    M. Tateyama
    I. Nakasone
    N. Yamane
    J. Fujita
    Infection, 2006, 34 : 264 - 268