A Review of Faculty Self-Assessment TPACK Instruments (January 2006 - March 2020)

被引:12
|
作者
Scott, Kristin C. [1 ]
机构
[1] McNeese State Univ, Management, Lake Charles, LA 70605 USA
关键词
CFA; Data Set; EFA; Literature Review; Survey; Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Survey; Validity and Reliability; PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; PHYSICAL-EDUCATION TEACHERS; SCIENCE TEACHERS; PRESERVICE; FRAMEWORK; PERCEPTIONS; MATHEMATICS; TECHNOLOGY; VALIDATION; CONSTRUCTS;
D O I
10.4018/IJICTE.2021040108
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Since Mishra and Koehler released their framework of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), researchers have been attempting to measure it with a variety of self-assessment instruments. Early TPACK instruments struggled with construct validity. More recently, several instruments have been tested for validity and reliability successfully. Since 2006, 233 articles have been published that use a TPACK self-assessment survey of faculty in either a mixed method or empirical study. When faced with this abundance of literature, researchers may be overwhelmed when attempting to find a survey instrument suitable for their own studies. This review is designed to help researchers find valid and reliable instruments for their study by describing frequently used scales, an analysis of respondents from the identified studies, and reliability and validity studies associated with published instruments. A link to the entire data set Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Self-Assessment Survey Dataset (2006 - March 2020) is also provided.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 137
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Self-Assessment Instruments for Supporting Family Caregivers: An Integrative Review
    Benedetti, Franzisca Domeisen
    Hechinger, Mareike
    Fringer, Andre
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [2] Faculty leadership through self-assessment
    Srividhya, S.
    Viji, P.
    LIFE SCIENCE JOURNAL-ACTA ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY OVERSEAS EDITION, 2012, 9 (04): : 4774 - 4778
  • [3] Self-assessment instruments: Development and validation
    Dollfus, S.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 33 : S69 - S69
  • [4] Comparison of Student Self-Assessment with Faculty Assessment of Clinical Competence
    Kustritz, Margaret V. Root
    Molgaard, Laura K.
    Rendahl, Aaron
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 38 (02) : 163 - 170
  • [5] Construct validity of data from a TPACK self-assessment instrument in 2-year public college faculty in the United States
    Scott, Kristin C.
    Nimon, Kim
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2020, 53 (04) : 427 - 445
  • [6] Faculty Self-Assessment on Telesimulation for Health Sciences Education
    Barrientos, Elena Rios
    Corolla, Miriam Lizzeth Turrubiates
    Olivares, Silvia Lizett
    IEEE REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE TECNOLOGIAS DEL APRENDIZAJE-IEEE RITA, 2023, 18 (01): : 28 - 32
  • [7] SELF-MADE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION INSTRUMENTS - AID TO SELF-ASSESSMENT
    BAILEY, GD
    EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 1977, 17 (03) : 49 - 51
  • [8] Malaysian Primary School Teachers' Self-Assessment of TPACK and their Blended Learning Practice
    Hong, Andy Lim Teik
    Stapa, Mahani
    Tian, Kiang Xin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INSTRUCTION, 2025, 18 (01) : 695 - 714
  • [10] Comparison of efficiency of different self-assessment instruments for screening dysphonia
    Oliveira, Priscila
    Lima, Heryka Maria Oliveira
    Sousa, Maiara dos Santos
    Almeida, Larissa Nadjara
    da Silva, Hemmylly Farias
    Ugulino, Ana Celiane
    Almeida, Anna Alice
    Lopes, Leonardo
    CODAS, 2022, 35 (02):